Search

The aims of this study were to estimate genetic parameters and to identify genomic regions associated with eating time (ET) and rumination time (RUT) in Holstein dairy cows. Genetic correlations among ET, RUT, and milk yield traits were also estimated. The data were collected from 2019 to 2022 in 6 dairy herds located in the Walloon Region of Belgium. The dataset consisted of daily ET and RUT records on 284 Holstein cows, from which 41 cows had records only for the first parity (P1), 101 cows had records from both the first and second parities, and 142 cows had records only for the second parity (P2). The number of daily ET and RUT records in the P1 and P2 cows were 18,569 (on 142 cows) and 34,464 (on 243 cows), respectively. Data on 28,994 SNPs located on 29 Bos taurus autosomes (BTA) of 747 animals (435 males) were used. Random regression test-day models were used to estimate genetic parameters through the Bayesian Gibbs sampling method. The SNP solutions were estimated using a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction approach. The proportion of genetic variance explained by each 20-SNP sliding window (with an average size of 1.52 Mb) was calculated, and regions accounting for at least 1.0% of the total additive genetic variance were used to search for candidate genes. Mean (standard deviation; SD) averaged daily ET and RUT were 327.0 (85.66) and 559.4 (77.69) min/d for cows in P1 and 316.0 (82.24) and 574.2 (75.42) min/d for cows in P2, respectively. Mean (standard deviation; SD) heritability estimates for daily ET and RUT were 0.42 (0.09) and 0.45 (0.06) for cows in P1 and 0.45 (0.04) and 0.43 (0.02) for cows in P2, respectively. Mean (SD) daily genetic correlations between daily ET and RUT were 0.27 (0.07) for P1 and 0.34 (0.08) for P2. Genome-wide association analyses identified 6 genomic regions distributed over 5 chromosomes (BTA1, BTA4, BTA11, 2 regions of BTA14, and BTA17) associated with ET or RUT. The findings of this study increase our preliminary understanding of the genetic background of feeding behavior in dairy cows; however, larger datasets are needed to determine whether ET and RUT might have the potential to be used in selection programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluating genetically heat stress (HS) of cattle is still a major challenge, also because of the need to have access to HS sensitive phenotypes relating their reaction to temperature and humidity as described by the temperature-humidity index (THI). A solution could be to add the information of data from sensors. However, activity (ACT) and rumination (RUM) sensors reflect no "production" [i.e., milk yields (MY), milk composition, but also intake or growth] related aspects which is suboptimal. Therefore, the objectives of this study were thus to assess the possible usefulness for adding sensors data for HS genetic evaluation based on a dairy situation. But the context described can be easily enlarged and include beef cattle and pigs. Strategy was illustrated using daily SenseHub collar records that were obtained from October 2019 to July 2022 in six dairy herds in Wallonia in Southern Belgium. A total of 453 Walloon Holstein cows were followed during this period for activity time. Meteorological data and a HS sensitive "production" trait (here MY) were also obtained from 2015 to 2022 for 1,740 cows from the same herds. In total 32,154 MY, 130,867 ACT and 130,848 RUM records were available. The thresholds at which the different traits start to be affected by HS were estimated at a THI of 63, 64 and 66, respectively, for MY, ACT and RUM. A three-trait random regression reaction norm model was fitted with these different thresholds. Estimated heritability values were 0.19 ± 0.03, 0.14 ± 0.06 and 0.21 ± 0.05 respectively for MY, ACT and RUM using AIREML. Ratios of variance associated to THI and constant genetic effect were 0.002, 0.02 and 0.04 indicating a stronger reaction by RUM but also ACT than MY to THI. However, it is uncertain if the reactions of these sensor traits are reflected in the production traits. Estimated genetic correlations of regressions on THI for ACT and RUM showed values of 0.51 ± 0.70 and 0.08 ± 0.54 with MY and 0.77 ± 0.69 between ACT and RUM. The first eigenvector of the correlation matrix explained 65% of the total variability and standardized coefficients of this eigenvector were 0.42, 0.69 and 0.59 for MY, ACT and RUM. A total of 50% of the variance associated with the regression on THI for MY could be explained by the regressions on THI for ACT and RUM. Adding the constant genetic effects for ACT and RUM only marginally increased to 51% the ability to explain the effect of THI on MY. Based on these results, reactions of different indicator traits, here sensor data, may reflect a different reaction than production and therefore economically important traits. Additional research, also beyond dairy cattle, should continue to address this topic that is very important for the validation of sensor data detecting HS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]