Search

This study evaluates the suitability of gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric (GC-MS) analysis to follow-up the extent of benzodiazepine (mis)use in a Belgian prison population and compares it to other analytical strategies (e.g. screening followed by confirmation of the positive samples). From February to August 1998, 598 persons were jailed of which 188 (31.4% of the incoming detainees) volunteered to be screened. Urine samples (530 in total) were collected on the day of arrival and after 14, 30 and 90 days of imprisonment. All samples were screened by EMIT® for benzodiazepines and analysed subsequently by GC-MS. EMIT® screening yielded 117 (22.1%) positive samples, a number which increased to 174 (32.8%) after GC-MS analysis. Of these 174 GC-MS positive samples, 119 (68.4%) contained one benzodiazepine while for the remaining samples multiple benzodiazepine (mis)use could be demonstrated. A significant increase in benzodiazepine (mis)use was indicated only from day 0 to day 14 based on the GC-MS results but not on the immunoassay results, even when the latter were complemented with GC-MS analysis of the positively screened samples. The GC-MS data also demonstrated that benzodiazepines are mainly (mis)used by subjects on benzodiazepine prescription as almost 50% of these subjects took additional non-prescribed benzodiazepines. During GC-MS analysis other drugs were co-extracted unintentionally and chromatographed and 23.9% of the volunteers were positive for illegal drugs on the day of arrival. Immunoassay results yield an underestimation of the problem of benzodiazepine (mis)use in prison due to the high false negative rate. GC-MS analysis of all samples therefore is the recommended strategy for this type of longitudinal study as it yields more correct and detailed information than the immunoassay results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous research demonstrated that Methadone Maintenance Programs (MMP) and Methadone Maintenance Treatment/Therapy (MMT) could significantly reduce the mortality risk. However, in current forensic practice, methadone ingestion can still directly or indirectly be involved in fatalities. The objectives of this study were twofold. Firstly, referring to the wide range of blood levels reported in methadone-related fatalities, we aimed to provide insight into the interpretation of a quantitative post-mortem blood concentration. Secondly, to examine and discuss possible causes, mechanisms and manners of death. During a 30-year-period, all medico-legal files at the Department of Forensic Medicine (Ghent University) were searched through, to investigate whether methadone was involved in the fatal outcome. A significant increase in the methadone-related fatalities was found since 1995, which has also been noticed in other studies. In our study (n=48), the most frequent cause of death was intoxication: only one was due to a pure methadone intoxication, whereas in all other fatal intoxications, a poly-drug intoxication was found. In this study, cardiopulmonary failure, induced by depression of the vital centres in the brainstem, was--as expected--the most important mechanism of death. When we considered the post-mortem blood levels in our study group, we observed a wide range, namely between 0.10 and 4.13 microg/ml (median: 0.54 microg/ml, mean: 0.81 microg/ml, SD: 0.14). This was in line with previous reports, although the extreme values differed. We conclude that the interpretation of post-mortem methadone blood levels is still hazardous due to e.g. difficulties to assess the individual tolerance level, the variety of surviving periods after ingestion, interfering post-mortem redistribution and the combined ingestion of methadone with other drugs. Therefore, a close collaboration between the forensic pathologist and toxicologist is recommended in order to provide a well-grounded conclusion.