1. Effects of chemical mechanism and meteorological factors on the concentration of atmospheric pollutants in the megacity Beijing, China.
- Author
-
Li, Yujie, Wu, Qizhong, Wang, Xiaoyan, Cheng, Huaqiong, Sun, Yiming, Li, Dongqing, Cao, Kai, Wang, Xueying, and Yang, Shurui
- Subjects
- *
MEGALOPOLIS , *AIR quality standards , *POLLUTANTS , *GAUSSIAN distribution , *AIR quality , *SPATIAL variation , *AIR pollution , *AIR pollutants - Abstract
To distinguish the effects of chemical mechanisms and meteorological factors on air pollution in the megacity of Beijing, the sensitive numerical experiments with the third-generation air quality modeling system (WRF-SMOKE-CMAQ) are designed for a one-year simulation in 2018. The results indicate that: 1) the modeling system plays well in performance in the megacity of Beijing in 2018. The correlation coefficient of the simulated PM 2.5 concentration and the observation value reaches 0.74, while the normal mean bias is −14%–32% in the National Standard Air Quality observation stations in Beijing. 2) The impact of chemical mechanisms on pollutants such as ANO 3 is significant, reaching 1075%. However, there is almost no impact on AEC, or ASO 4 from the chemical mechanisms. The impact of chemical mechanisms on NO and O 3 concentration is between the aforementioned two, with a relatively small degree of impact. The influence of chemical mechanisms on PM 2.5 concentration is 35%, while the meteorological factors are 65% under the experiments. 3) For the photochemical species, the peak frequencies of NO 2 concentration in the two experiments are 27.1 ppbV and 5.9 ppbV, respectively, and the peak frequency of NO 2 observed concentration is 19.1 ppbV, near to the simulation in the baseline group, which illustrates that the chemical mechanism includes a large amount of NO 2 generation. The numerical model is a good tool to quantify the effect of chemical mechanisms and meteorological factors. In addition, the concentration of NO 2 in Beijing is decreasing from urban to exurb areas in terms of spatial distribution, and the spatial variation of PM 2.5 is also the same. • The influence of chemical mechanisms on PM 2.5 concentration is 35%, while the influence of meteorological factors is 65%. • The chemical mechanisms have varying impact on the PM components, a significant on ANO 3 , while a little impact on ASO 4. • The difference in the peak frequency of the normal distribution on NO 2 between the two experiments reached 8 ppbV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF