1. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Timeliness of Clinical Care Pathway for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Austria: The PRATER Retrospective Study.
- Author
-
Hochmair, Maximilian, Terbuch, Angelika, Lang, David, Trockenbacher, Christian, Augustin, Florian, Ghanim, Bahil, Maurer, Dominik, Taghizadeh, Hossein, Kamhuber, Christoph, Wurm, Robert, Lindenmann, Jörg, Braz, Petra, Bundalo, Tatjana, Begic, Merjem, Bauer, Johanna, Reimann, Patrick, Müser, Nino, Huemer, Florian, Schlintl, Verena, and Bianconi, Daniela
- Subjects
- *
RADIOTHERAPY , *RESEARCH funding , *PROGRAMMED death-ligand 1 , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *TUMOR markers , *CANCER chemotherapy , *IMMUNE checkpoint inhibitors , *RESEARCH , *LUNG cancer , *TUMOR classification , *EPIDERMAL growth factor receptors - Abstract
Simple Summary: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of lung cancer. Treatments and outcomes for NSCLC are evolving as a result of multiple approvals for immunotherapies and targeted therapies but may also be affected by limitations in clinical care access. In the PRATER study, we described the profile and treatments of patients diagnosed with Stage I–III NSCLC in Austria prior to the introduction of new therapies in the pre-/post-operative setting. We found that therapeutic strategies were aligned with guidelines at that time. Clinical care was timely delivered in most but not all early-stage NSCLC patients. As an additional exploratory objective, we showed that lung cancer care was not significantly affected by COVID-19 restrictions in Austria. Real-world evidence generated here will support future cancer care policies and evaluations of healthcare system efficiency in clinical adoption of new therapies. This was a retrospective study of the profile and initial treatments of adults diagnosed with early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during January 2018–December 2021 at 16 leading hospital institutions in Austria, excluding patients enrolled in clinical trials. In total, 319 patients were enrolled at a planned ~1:1:1 ratio across StI:II:III. Most tested biomarkers were programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1; 58% expressing), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS; 22% positive), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; 18% positive). Of 115/98/106 StI/II/III patients, 82%/85%/36% underwent surgery, followed by systemic therapy in 9%/45%/47% of those [mostly chemotherapy (ChT)]. Unresected treated StIII patients received ChT + radiotherapy [43%; followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 39% of those], ICI ± ChT (35%), and ChT-alone/radiotherapy-alone (22%). Treatment was initiated a median (interquartile range) of 24 (7–39) days after histological confirmation, and 55 (38–81) days after first medical visit. Based on exploratory analyses of all patients newly diagnosed with any stage NSCLC during 2018–2021 at 14 of the sites (N = 7846), 22%/10%/25%/43% had StI/II/III/IV. The total number was not significantly different between pre-COVID-19 (2018–2019) and study-specific COVID-19 (2020–2021) periods, while StI proportion increased (21% vs. 23%; p = 0.012). Small differences were noted in treatments. In conclusion, treatments were aligned with guideline recommendations at a time which preceded the era of ICIs and targeted therapies in the (neo)adjuvant setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF