Search

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) using left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have considerably improved the quality of life and survival rate of patients with end-stage heart failure. Despite substantial technological progress, major challenges with regard to VAD-specific and VAD-related infections have hitherto hindered the broader application of this promising therapy approach. Driveline infections (DLI) range among the main adverse events experienced in LVAD patients. However, many centers still apply their own protocol for driveline exit site (DLES) care and an international standard on prevention, reduction and early treatment of DLI after the perioperative period has not yet been defined. In March 2019, VAD coordinators and cardiac surgeons from Germany and Austria met to develop a standard of care procedure (SOP) as well as a new staging approach with recommended actions for treatment of VAD carriers. In this Driveline Expert STagINg and carE (DESTINE) study group we developed a 10-step SOP for DLES care with emphasis on essentials such as clean and save preparation, sterile dressing change and secure driveline immobilization. An advanced wound staging approach was defined with recommended actions for prevention, early detection and stage-related management of DLI. Broad consensus was reached on the fact that an interdisciplinary approach both in DLES care and DLES healing disorder awareness is required to prolong infect-free survival times on MCS as well as to ensure high patient compliance and quality of life. In conclusion, a new detailed SOP for appropriate DLES care and an advanced wound staging approach for prevention and management of DLI were defined on an expert level applicable for VAD clinicians, practitioners and care givers in Central Europe., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Few reports have described associations between a bleeding revision and outcomes after implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all adult recipients of a continuous-flow LVAD who were operated on between January 2006 and December 2016 at the Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna (N = 257). LVAD types were HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), HeartMate II (Abbott [Thoratec], Abbott Park, IL), and HeartMate 3 (Abbott [Thoratec]). The primary outcome variable was survival during LVAD support. Secondary outcome variables were rates of prolonged ventilation, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, renal replacement therapy, and stroke. We additionally investigated risk factors for a bleeding revision., Results: Thirty-six patients (14%) underwent surgical revision for bleeding. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, bleeding revision was associated with significantly reduced survival during LVAD support (3 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20 to 3.48; 6 months: HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.82; 12 months: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.69 to 2.46; 24 months: HR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.48 to 2.26; overall p = 0.007). Rates of secondary outcome variables were substantially higher in the revision group compared with patients who survived the hospital stay without a bleeding revision. Concomitant implantation of a temporary right ventricular assist device (p = 0.002) and age (p = 0.028) were independent risk factors for a bleeding revision., Conclusions: A bleeding revision is associated with significantly reduced survival and substantially increased morbidity during LVAD support. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative prophylactic strategies may help to prevent this life-threatening complication., (Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)