1. Patient-centered discharge summaries to support safety and individual health literacy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial in Austria.
- Author
-
Schwarz, Christine Maria, Hoffmann, Magdalena, Smolle, Christian, Borenich, Andrea, Fürst, Stefan, Tuca, Alexandru-Cristian, Holl, Anna Katharina, Gugatschka, Markus, Grogger, Victor, Kamolz, Lars-Peter, and Sendlhofer, Gerald
- Subjects
HEALTH literacy ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,MEDICAL personnel ,MEDICAL students ,HOSPITAL admission & discharge - Abstract
Background: To ensure a safe patient discharge from hospital it is necessary to transfer all relevant information in a discharge summary (DS). The aim of this study was to evaluate a bundle of measures to improve the DS for physicians, nurses and patients. Methods: In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, four different versions of DS (2 original, 2 revised) were tested with physicians, nurses and patients. We used an evaluation sheet (Case report form, CRF) with a 6-point Likert scale (1 = completely agree; 6 = strongly disagree). Results: In total, 441 participants (physicians n = 146, nurses n = 140, patients n = 155) were included in the study. Overall, the two revised DS received significant better ratings than the original DS (original 2.8 ± 0.8 vs. revised 2.1 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). Detailed results for the main domains are structured DS (original 1.9 ± 0.9 vs. revised 2.2 ± 1.3, p = 0.015), content (original 2.7 ± 0.9 vs revised 2.0 ± 0.9, p < 0.001) and comprehensibility (original 3.8 ± 1.2vs. revised 2.3 ± 1.2, p < 0.001). Conclusion: With simple measures like avoiding abbreviations and describing indications or therapies with fixed contents, the DS can be significantly improved for physicians, nurses and patients at the same time. Trial registration: First registration 13/11/2020 NCT04628728 at www.clinicaltrials.gov, Update 15/03/2023. Key messages: 1. To ensure a safe patient discharge from hospital it is necessary to transfer all relevant information in a discharge summary (DS). 2. Several issues related to the medical DS have already been identified delayed transmission of the DS to the subsequently treating physician and others, low quality or lack of information, lack of consistent formats, lack of patient understanding, and inadequate training for medical students in writing medical DS. 3. It would also be necessary that the patients understand the DS; - or at least receive therapeutically relevant care information in form of a patient-directed DS. 4. With simple measures like avoiding abbreviations and describing fixed content, the DS can be significantly improved for patients, physicians, and nurses at the same time. 5. The DS should become a patient‐centred tool ensuring that improved communication and understanding between healthcare professionals, patients and relatives succeeds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF