Search

Burn trauma induces hypermetabolism and alters thermoregulation resulting in elevated body temperature. Because patients with burns are prone to heat loss and hypothermia, maintaining physiologic body temperature is important. However, optimal target temperature is widely unknown because thermoregulation of burn trauma has mainly been studied in the previous century, when treatment concepts differed from current era. The aim of this study was to investigate current thermal management of burn treatment and to investigate the discrepancies between classical concepts of thermoregulation in burn trauma and current practice of temperature management. A paper-based survey was conducted in burn centres in Germany, Austria, and German-speaking Switzerland. Participants were asked for expected temperatures, temperature goals, and thermal management of severely burned patients. Results were evaluated for adults and children. 37 of 38 approached burn centres participated in this survey. 59 % expected that adults with burn trauma would develop hyperthermia (>37.5 °C) but only 27 % expected hyperthermia in children (>38 °C). The average target body temperature was 37.1 °C for adults and 36.9 °C for children. Adults below 35.7 °C and children below 36.0 °C were assessed to be hypothermic. Temperatures above 38.8 °C in adults and 38.7 °C in children raised suspicion for sepsis. Antipyretic treatment was assumed to be justified at temperatures above 39.1 °C in adults and 38.5 °C in children. Although the most common warming method was to increase ambient temperature, 89 % of all participants felt their wellbeing was affected by an increased ambient temperature and 68 % were concerned about temperature-related negative effects. Although 57 % of the responding centres had established a standard operating procedure for thermal management, only 41 % considered the available literature to be very relevant in daily practice and 89 % criticized the lack of guidelines. Limit and target temperatures in European burn centres are heterogeneous. Classic concepts of thermal management in burn care are not universally adopted. A majority of the centers expresses the need for specific guidelines. The basis for this should be multicentre clinical trials on temperature management in burn trauma., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The current S2k guidelines on the diagnostics and treatment of peripartum hemorrhage are summarized in this article from the perspective of anesthesiology based on a fictitious case report. The update of the guidelines was written under the auspices of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics with the participation of other professional societies and interest groups from Germany, Austria and Switzerland and published by the AWMF in 2022 under the register number 015/063., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: For the medical team, the management of pregnant trauma patients is a particular challenge. The aim of this study is to compile this data and to determine differences between pregnant and not pregnant trauma patients., Materials and Methods: We carried out a retrospective data analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU® with a comparison of 102 pregnant and 3135 not pregnant women of child-bearing age (16-45 years) from 2016-2018 who were treated in a trauma center. All patients were delivered to the resuscitation room and received intensive care treatment., Results: In Germany, Austria and Switzerland 3.2% of all trauma patients (102 women) were pregnant. Women with an average age of 29 years suffered most often trauma as a result of a road traffic accident. Major trauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥16 points) was seen in 24.5% of the pregnant women and 37.4% of the nonpregnant women. A computer tomography (whole body computer tomography) was carried out in 32.7% of all pregnant women but in 79.8% of the nonpregnant women. As a result of the trauma, 2.9% of the pregnant and 3.5% of the not pregnant women died. The standardised mortality rate (SMR) was 0.42 in pregnant women and 0.63 in nonpregnant women., Conclusion: For the first time there is data regarding incidence, trauma mechanism, prehospital and in-hospital care as well as intensive care of pregnant trauma patients in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Further research regarding foetal outcome and trauma-related injuries in pregnant women is needed to develop an adjusted management for these patients ready to implement in trauma centres. Gynaecologists and obstetricians should be implemented in the trauma room team when needed.