Search

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a newer ablation energy source with the potential to reduce complications and improve efficacy compared to conventional thermal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This study aimed to present an initial single-centre Australian experience of PFA for AF ablation., Methods: Initial consecutive patients undergoing PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF at a single centre were included. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural data and clinical outcomes were collected prospectively at the time of the procedure. Patients were followed up at 3 months and 6-monthly thereafter., Results: In total, 100 PFA procedures were performed in 97 patients under general anaesthesia. All pulmonary veins (403 of 403) were successfully isolated acutely. Median follow-up was 218 days (range, 16-343 days), and the Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 180 days was 87% (95% confidence interval 79%-95%). Median procedure time was 74 minutes (range, 48-134 minutes). Median fluoroscopy dose-area product was 345 μGym 2 (interquartile range, 169-685 μGym 2 ). Two (2%) pseudoaneurysm vascular access complications occurred. There were no cases of thromboembolic complications, stroke, phrenic nerve palsy, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-oesophageal fistula, or pericardial tamponade., Conclusions: Pulsed field ablation can be performed safely and efficiently, with encouraging efficacy in early follow-up. Further data and clinical trials will be required to assess the comparative utility of PFA in contemporary AF ablation practice., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest A/Prof. Haqqani has received speaking honoraria, consulting and proctoring fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic. and Abbott. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). All rights reserved.)

A retrospective study using an obstetric risk score protocol was applied to a stratified sequential sample of 843 singleton livebirths, occurring in the Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, over a 12-month period (March, 1985-February, 1986). Data collection included 53 prenatal factors, 41 intrapartum factors and 37 neonatal factors. The study was comprised of 346 women admitted to the hospital birth centre and 497 women admitted to labour ward. In labour ward admitted women there was a significant association between high prenatal scores, high intrapartum scores and high neonatal morbidity scores. Women admitted to the birth centre were subjected to a screening procedure which resulted in low prenatal and relatively low intrapartum risk scores. However, neonatal morbidity scores were similar for both groups. The risk scoring protocol used in this study requires further revision to allow the adequate selection of low risk women delivering infants with a low risk of neonatal morbidity in a low risk obstetric setting.