Search

Newly arrived refugees and asylum seekers are faced with many difficulties in accessing effective health care when settling in Australia. Cultural, language and financial constraints, lack of awareness of available services, and lack of health provider understanding of the complex health concerns of refugees can all contribute to limiting access to health care. Understanding the complexities of a new health care system under these circumstances and finding a regular health provider may be difficult. In some cases there may be a fundamental distrust of government services. The different levels of health entitlements by visa category and (for some) detention on arrival in Australia may further complicate the provision and use of health services for providers and patients. Children are particularly at risk of suboptimal health care due to the impact of these factors combined with the effect of resettlement stresses on parents’ ability to care for their children. Unaccompanied and separated children, and those in detention experience additional challenges in accessing care. This article aims to increase awareness among health professionals caring for refugee children of the challenges faced by this group in accessing and receiving effective health care in Australia. Particular consideration is given to the issues of equity, rights of asylum seekers, communication and cultural sensitivities in health care provision, and addressing barriers to health care. The aim of the paper is to alert practitioners to the complex issues surrounding the delivery of health care to refugee children and provide realistic recommendations to guide practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The number of Australians dying each year is predicted to double in the next 25 years and there is an urgent need to establish sustainable models for providing high quality end-of-life care. An innovative community care model (Bupa Palliative Care Choices Program or BPCCP) was developed and piloted with the purpose of supporting patients in achieving their choices surrounding end-of-life care., Aims: This study evaluates whether BPCCP patients were more likely to die in their place of choice compared with patients receiving standard care. Additional aims were evaluating patient and carer satisfaction and insurer cost., Methods: This prospective, comparative cohort study comprises a clinical chart audit and survey of patient and carer experience., Results: More BPCCP participants preferred to die at home (53% vs 31%). A lower proportion of BPCCP patients died in acute hospitals (10% vs 19%) and more of this cohort died at home (46% vs 26%). In both cohorts, nearly 90% of patients were able to die in their preferred location. Patient and carer satisfaction with the programme was very high in the small cohort who responded to the survey. There was a decrease in average claims spend per patient enrolled in the programme during the first 12-month period of implementation compared with historical claims spend for inpatients only., Conclusions: This evaluation of an innovative community palliative care intervention indicates that the extra services available to patients support the choice of dying at home and the ability to do so while generating claims cost efficiencies., (© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)