Search

Increasing mature-age access to education and training in a way that is responsive to changing labour market needs is a key policy challenge. In this paper we examine the impacts of a unique reform in the Australian state of Victoria that aimed to meet this challenge by introducing a broad-based voucher for those 25 and older. In effect, the reform uncapped public course-level funding and linked it to individual student choice instead of centralised funding allocations. Using national administrative enrolment data and difference-in-differences estimation, exploiting the continuation of existing centralised funding models in other states, we find that the voucher increased mature-age vocational education and training participation and improved the alignment of course enrolments with measures of prevailing skill needs, including enrolments of disadvantaged groups. Our study provides first evidence on the use of broad-based vouchers in vocational education and training to expand access to mature-age learning in a demand-responsive way. These results provide support for policies that put student choice at the centre of efforts to lift mature-age access to training, which is especially important for countries, such as the United States, that have traditionally funded vocational education and training through centralised allocations.

Objectives To describe time trends and other predictors of recent HIV testing among homosexual men enrolled in behavioural surveillance studies in Australia. Methods Repeated cross-sectional studies during the period 1996–2001 in Australian capital cities. Men were recruited from a variety of community-based settings, including gay community outdoor events, sex on premises venues, and social venues. They underwent a brief self-administered questionnaire in which they reported their HIV status, HIV-testing history, sexual behaviour and demographic information. Results Questionnaires were returned for 22 161 HIV-negative or status-unknown participants. While 85.3% had ever tested for HIV, 57.6% had tested in the last 12 months. Recent testing was greater in those living in Sydney, in younger men, in gay-identified men, in gay community-attached men, in those who reported unprotected anal intercourse and a higher number of sexual partners, and in partners of HIV-positive men. Although recent testing declined from 1996 to 2001, this trend was no longer significant when adjusted for other testing predictors. Conclusions In Australia, HIV testing among gay men decreased slightly from 1996 to 2001, but the trend was not significant when adjusted for other predictors. Testing levels were highest among those at highest risk of HIV infection, and lowest among non gay-identified and non gay-community attached homosexual men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examined trends in sexual practice among gay and homosexually active men in Australia. Self-complete questionnaires were distributed with mail-order sex video catalogues in 2000 and returned anonymously through a reply-paid facility. The data were compared with those from men who responded to promotional material sent out with the same catalogues and who participated in national telephone surveys of men who have sex with men conducted in 1992 and 1996. A key independent variable was gay community attached (GCA) versus non-GCA (NGCA) derived from two items about number of gay friends and amount of free time spent with gay men. Responses came from 1,832 men ranging in age from 16 to 80 (median = 39) years. HIV status was 73% negative, 5% positive, 22% untested; 1,181 men were GCA and 651 men were NGCA. Overall, from 1992 to 2000 there was a significant upward trend in the proportion of men reporting any unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in the previous six months with regular partners: 21.5%, 24.7%, 46.4% of the total sample (p < 0.001). And similarly for UAI with casual partners: 12.4%, 16.2%, 25.5% (p < 0.001). The upward trends in UAI-regular and UAI-casual were similar and significant (p < 0.001) for both GCA and NGCA men. These nationwide Australian data provide evidence of continuing increases in unprotected anal intercourse with regular and with casual partners. Whereas the majority of men do not engage in any unprotected anal intercourse during a defined interval, ever increasing proportions of them do. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is important to know if optimism about HIV treatments is widespread and whether it is growing. To this end, cross-sectional surveys of gay men were conducted 6-monthly in Sydney between February 1997 and February 1999 (n = 3012). Recruitment was consistent at 4 gay community venues. The participants responded True, False or Unsure to 5 statements about the effectiveness of HIV treatments (2 items), and transmission (2 items) and 'worry' (1 item) in the context of treatments. In terms of effectiveness, HIV-positive men were more likely than non-positive men to dismiss 'cure' (P < 0.05) and more likely to support 'treatments prevent serious illness' (P < 0.001). Uncertainty about effectiveness decreased over time (P < 0.001 for each item). In terms of transmission, HIV-positive men were more likely than non-positive men to reject notions of reduced infectivity (P < 0.001). Over time, there was less uncertainty among non-positive men about undetectable viral load and transmission possibilities (P < 0.001). Overall, HIV-positive men were less 'worried' than non-positive men (P < 0.001) but there were no changes over time. On the whole, gay men in Sydney are now less uncertain about highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) than at the time of their introduction. Most men remain sceptical that these treatments can cure HIV infection and prevent HIV transmission, but in regard to managing illness among those infected, some initial uncertainty is being replaced by a growing optimism about the efficacy of treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Whereas most gay men in Australia know their HIV test result, a consistent minority do not. From Gay Community Periodic Surveys (n=6831) conducted during 1998 in the 5 largest cities, those who did not have HIV test results (13.3% overall) comprised 10.0% in Sydney, 15.7% in Melbourne, 13.6% in Brisbane, 15.2% in Perth and 14.0% in Adelaide, representing a significant difference between cities (P < 0.001). Gay men who did not have HIV test results differed from those who did in several ways. They were on average younger (31 vs 35 years, P<0.001) and less likely to be in professional occupations (P<0.001). They were less likely to identify themselves as 'gay' (P<0.001), spent less time with other gay men (P<0.001) and had fewer gay friends (P<0.001). They had sex with fewer different men 'in the previous 6 months' (P<0.001) and were more likely to be in a monogamous relationship or without sexual partners at the time of the survey (P<0.001). With respect to both regular and casual partners, they were more likely (P<0.001) to have 'no such partner'/'no anal intercourse' rather than 'anal intercourse' (either always protected or sometimes unprotected). These differences between gay men who did and did not have HIV test results were confirmed in a logistic regression (apart from 'amount of free time spent with gay men' and 'relationship status' which were accounted for by closely correlated variables in the reduced logistic model). Social and sexual environment appears to exert an influence on HIV testing rather than sexual risk per se. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We set out to determine the frequency and correlates of gay men's repeated unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (UAI-C), defined as UAI-C reported at each of 3 annual interviews. By May 1997, 659 men had completed 3 annual interviews for the Sydney Men and Sexual Health (SMASH) cohort study. For the 3 6-month periods prior to each interview, 127 men reported UAI-C during one period only; 45 reported it during 2 periods; and 20 men reported it during all 3 periods. These 20 men who had repeated UAI-C were compared with 497 men who had anal intercourse with casual partners but did not report on all 3 occasions that they had UAI-C. Logistic regression revealed that repeated UAI-C was associated with HIV-positive status, more casual partners, less favourable attitudes toward condoms and greater recreational drug use. Few gay men have repeated UAI-C but those who do run greater risk of HIV transmission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to determine and describe HIV-negative gay men's willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials. Data were from participants who completed face-to-face interviews during the first 18 months (to the end of 2002) of recruitment into the Health in Men cohort of HIV-negative gay men in Sydney. A key outcome measure was a scale of Willingness to Participate in HIV Vaccine Trials, with scores ranging from 1 (unwilling) to 4 (willing). The 903 participants ranged in age from 18 to 75 years (median = 36). Mean of Willingness to Participate in HIV Vaccine Trials was 2.53 (standard deviation = 0.54), with approximately 51% of the men having a score greater than the midpoint of 2.50. A reduced linear regression model yielded four significant independent associations with Willingness to Participate in HIV Vaccine Trials: lack of tertiary education (P < 0.001),having engaged 'in the previous six months' in any unprotected anal intercourse with casual or non-concordant regular partners (P < 0.001), higher self-rated likelihood of HIV infection (P < 0.01), and higher mean scores on a scale of Comfort with Participation in HIV Vaccine Trials (P < 0.001). The willingness of HIV-negative gay men at potentially higher risk for HIV to participate in HIV vaccine trials augurs well for enrolment in HIV vaccine efficacy trials. Recruitment into trials is likely to be enhanced by addressing salient concerns such as confidentiality and vaccine-induced antibody positivity. Also, it will be important to ensure that gay men are educated and fully informed about HIV vaccines and trial processes.

Background: Previous mathematical models have indicated that any decrease in HIV incidence in homosexual men due to decreased infectiousness from antiretroviral treatment (ARV) may be offset by modest increases in unsafe sex. The aims of this study were to assess the effects of ARV use and increasing unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (UAIC) in homosexual men on HIV incidence during 1995-2001 and to project HIV incidence depending on trends in ARV use and UAIC., Methods: A mathematical model of HIV transmission among homosexual men in Australia was developed. HIV incidence during 1995-2001 was estimated assuming that 70% of men in whom HIV was diagnosed received ARVs and assuming a 10% annual increase in UAIC. For 2001-2006, scenarios included ARV levels remaining at 70% or declining to 50% by 2006, combined with UAIC levels remaining at the 2001 level or continuing to increase annually by 10%., Findings: The number of incident HIV cases per year was predicted to have declined during 1996-1998 due to the introduction of effective ARVs, with a slow increase during 1998-2001 due to increased levels of UAIC when use of therapies was fairly stable. From 2001, a continued increase in UAIC was predicted to lead to a rise in HIV incidence. A rise in UAIC combined with a moderate decline in ARV use could lead to a 50% increase in HIV incidence by 2006., Interpretation: These models suggest that widespread ARV use has had some effect in reducing HIV incidence among homosexual men in Australia. However, if current trends in UAIC and ARV use continue, a resurgent HIV epidemic is predicted.

This study aimed to develop reliable scales of HIV vaccine attitudes. Gay men were recruited at the 2001 Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras Fair Day, a large gay community gathering of thousands of people. A total of 776 participants completed a questionnaire containing 38 items about HIV vaccines. Factor analysis of the responses of 585 HIV-negative/untested men revealed four distinct factors (accounting cumulatively for 24.5% of the variance): I, Comfort with Participation in HIV Vaccine Trials, Cronbach alpha = 0.81; II, Confidence in HIV Vaccines/Vaccine Trials, Cronbach alpha = 0.71; III, Sexual Freedom, Cronbach alpha = 0.64; IV, Willingness to Participate in HIV Vaccine Trials, Cronbach alpha = 0.59. Of the HIV-negative/untested men, 162 (27.7%) were likely/very likely to volunteer for HIV vaccine trials, and 422 (72.3%) were unlikely/very unlikely to do so. As preliminary evidence of construct validity, the 162 men had a higher mean score on scale I (2.79), indicating greater comfort with trial participation than their 422 counterparts (2.47, p < 0.001). As preliminary evidence of concurrent validity, the 162 men had a higher mean score on scale IV (2.79), indicating greater willingness to participate than the rest (2.22, p < 0.001). Alongside HIV vaccine trials, these scales may be a useful adjunct to social research in gay communities; to monitor and be responsive to community concerns about HIV vaccine trials as well as their potential to undermine safe sex practices.

This study examines patterns of agreement, knowledge and practice which can prevent or facilitate HIV transmission among men who are in regular ('primary') male-to-male relationships. Data are from a national volunteer phone-in survey of homosexually-active men in Australia. A sub-sample of 1070 men from a larger sample (n=3039) were found to have one or more regular partners for longer than 6 months. Self-reported HIV serostatus of survey participant and his regular partner, type of agreement regarding anal intercourse both within and outside the regular relationship, and engaging in unprotected anal intercourse with regular and with casual partners were examined. Risk practice was defined as unprotected anal intercourse with a regular partner of different or unknown serostatus and/or unprotected anal intercourse with a casual partner. Agreements were classified as: negotiated safety (28.8%); no unprotected anal intercourse (33.6%); unsafe (10.6%) and no agreement (17.0%). Risk practice was reported by 17.8% of the men. Type of agreement was found to be the strongest predictor of risk practice. Negotiated safety agreements were common, and were kept on the whole. Men with unsafe agreements, although only a small proportion of men in relationships, had high levels of risk practice.

Objectives: To investigate associations between gay men's optimism and sexual behaviour in the context of new HIV treatments., Methods: Cross-sectional surveys (using anonymous, self-completed questionnaires) were conducted in Sydney during February 1998 (n = 2200) and in Melbourne during January 1998 (n = 1891). Gay men were recruited at social and sex-on-premises venues, clinics and fair days/carnivals., Results: In a multivariate analysis, unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (UAIC) was associated with being recruited at a sex-on-premises venue (rather than a clinic or fair day/carnival), HIV positivity, having been tested for HIV less than 6 months ago (rather than over 2 years ago or never having been tested), and not having a regular partner. Over and above these factors, UAIC was associated with agreement with the statements 'An HIV-positive person who is on combination therapy is unlikely to transmit HIV' and 'I'm less worried about HIV infection than I used to be'., Conclusions: The data reveal a significant relationship between UAIC and certain aspects of optimism in the context of new HIV treatments. Whereas the direction of causality cannot be specified, there is a clear need for HIV and sexual health education programmes to clarify issues of viral load, new and drug resistant strains of HIV, and other infectious agents.

The aim of this study was to provide current data on the sexual practices in a broad cross-sectional sample of gay and homosexually active men in Sydney. Anonymous, short questionnaires were completed by 1611 gay men recruited at the 1996 Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras Fair Day or at one of six venues (including two sexual health centres) across the metropolitan area during the following week. The sample was diverse, but the men tended to be of Anglo-Australian background, well educated, professionally employed, attached to gay community and gay identified. They mainly had sex with other men rather than with men and women. Most (86.0 per cent) had been tested for human immunodeficiency virus. Excluding 241 men recruited in sexual health centres, 11.2 per cent were HIV-positive and 73.4 per cent were negative. Where it occurred in regular relationships, unprotected anal intercourse was usually between seroconcordant partners (78.5 per cent). Unprotected anal intercourse between discordant or nonconcordant regular partners was much less common, and in about half the cases involved withdrawal prior to ejaculation exclusively rather than ejaculation inside. Almost 12 per cent of the men had at least 'occasionally' engaged in unprotected anal intercourse with a casual partner in the previous six months, with approximately half of these men having adopted a withdrawal strategy on every occasion. We conclude that short surveys can provide valuable and timely data on sexual practices in a broad cross-sectional sample of gay and homosexually active men. Key messages for those involved in gay men's education are the high rates of unprotected anal intercourse between casual partners and the extensive practice of withdrawal.