1. Quality indicators for in-hospital management of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results of an international Delphi study.
- Author
-
Lodewijckx, Cathy, Sermeus, Walter, Panella, Massimiliano, Deneckere, Svin, Leigheb, Fabrizio, Troosters, Thierry, Boto, Paulo Alexandre, Mendes, Rita Veloso, Decramer, Marc, and Vanhaecht, Kris
- Subjects
OBSTRUCTIVE lung disease treatment ,DISEASE exacerbation ,CINAHL database ,CLINICAL medicine ,CRITICAL care medicine ,DELPHI method ,EMPLOYEES ,EXPERIENCE ,HOSPITAL utilization ,HOSPITALS ,INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems ,MEDICAL databases ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,LUNG diseases ,OBSTRUCTIVE lung diseases ,EVALUATION of medical care ,MEDICAL protocols ,MEDICAL rehabilitation ,MEDLINE ,NURSES ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,OXYGEN therapy ,PATIENT education ,PATIENT satisfaction ,PHYSICAL therapists ,PHYSICAL therapy ,PHYSICIANS ,PROBABILITY theory ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESEARCH evaluation ,RESEARCH funding ,SCALE analysis (Psychology) ,SCALES (Weighing instruments) ,HEALTH self-care ,STATISTICAL hypothesis testing ,STATISTICS ,SURVEYS ,U-statistics ,JUDGMENT sampling ,KEY performance indicators (Management) ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
lodewijckx c., sermeus w., panella m., deneckere s., leigheb f., troosters t., boto p.a., mendes r.v., decramer m. & vanhaecht k. (2012) Quality indicators for in-hospital management of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results of an international Delphi study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 69(2), 348-362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06013.x Abstract Aim. To report a Delphi study that was conducted to select process and outcome indicators that are relevant to study quality of care and impact of care pathways for patients hospitalized with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Background. Management of patients hospitalized with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is suboptimal and outcomes are poor. To evaluate the impact of care pathways properly, relevant indicators need to be selected. Design. Delphi study. Methods. The study was conducted over 4 months in 2008, with 35 experts out of 15 countries, including 19 medical doctors, 8 nurses and 8 physiotherapists. Participants were asked to rate, for 72 process and 21 outcome indicators, the relevance for follow-up in care pathways for in-hospital management of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consensus (agreement by at least 75% of the participants) that an indicator is relevant for follow-up was sought in two rounds. Results. Consensus was reached for 26 of 72 process indicators (36·1%) and 10 of 21 outcome indicators (47·6%). Highest consensus levels were found for the process indicators regarding oxygen therapy (100%), pulmonary rehabilitation (100%) and patient education (94·5-88·6%) and for the outcome indicators concerning understanding of therapy (91·4-85·7%) and self-management (88·6-88·2%). Conclusion. The selected indicators appear to be sensitive for improvement. Therefore, researchers and clinicians that want to study and improve the care for patients hospitalized with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease should primarily focus on these indicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF