Search

Background: Accurate measurement of sweat chloride concentration is essential for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF). We surveyed all laboratories enrolled in the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (QAP) for Sweat Electrolytes to determine how closely they comply with the Australian Guidelines for the performance of the sweat test for the diagnosis of CF., Methods: A detailed questionnaire covering most aspects of sweat collection and analysis was sent to all participating laboratories in 2007., Results: Twenty out of 38 laboratories completed the questionnaire. While adherence to accepted guidelines was noted in many areas, the following main variations were recorded: some laboratories were not doing enough sweat tests to maintain expertise; some were not collecting sweat for the recommended collection time; sweat conductivity was the only test available in some laboratories; there was a lack of agreement between the sweat chloride concentration used to indicate CF or define an equivocal result., Conclusions: There is room for improvement in the performance of the sweat test in some laboratories in Australasia. The Sweat Testing Working Party of the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists is the appropriate body to address the problems involved in sweat testing and to bring about change.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis has been used in Australia and New Zealand for over 20 years. In that time, considerable experience has been developed regarding the early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis after newborn screening. To date, there has not been a consensus on the process of screening and clinical evaluation leading to the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in infants, many of whom are not symptomatic at time of notification of the screening result. The aim of this paper is to provide some consensus on the important issues of a cystic fibrosis diagnosis arising from newborn screening, based on the experience gained in Australia and New Zealand over the last 20 years., (Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc)

We compare two protocols for newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). The first uses the immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) assay with a cutoff of > or = 180 ng/ml and a sweat test to identify CF patients. The second uses the IRT assay with a 100 ng/ml cutoff in conjunction with direct analysis for the delta F508 CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutation in a two-tiered (i.e., IRT/DNA) protocol, followed by a sweat test. We screened 220,865 newborns from Wisconsin for CF, using the IRT protocol identifying 369 infants with an elevated IRT, of whom 46 were found to have CF. Another 7 CF patients were identified who had a false-negative IRT level. The CF incidence in the white population was 1 in 3,431 (carrier incidence of 1 in 30). The IRT protocol had a sensitivity of 87% and a positive predictive value of 12.5%. We subsequently used the IRT/DNA protocol to screen 21,258 infants. Of 518 infants with an IRT level > or = 100 ng/ml, 24 carried at least one copy of the delta F508 CFTR mutation, and 4 of these infants were found to have CF, yielding a positive predictive value for this protocol of 16.7%. Direct comparison of the positive predictive value of the two protocols is not valid, because of the different populations screened. However, had the IRT protocol been used on the IRT/DNA cohort, 50 infants, including the 4 with CF, would have received sweat tests, yielding a positive predictive value of 8%. Because of the small sample size, this positive predictive value is not significantly different from that obtained for the IRT/DNA test. However, from a practical point of view the IRT/DNA approach does decrease considerably the number of sweat tests that must be undertaken. The number of false positives for the IRT protocol (46 in 21,258) is increased significantly compared with that for the IRT/DNA approach (20 in 21,258; P < .001). The incidence of delta F508 carriers detected in cohorts with an elevated IRT level was increased compared with the incidence in the general population. The direct costs for the IRT/DNA approach (100 ng/ml) were $11,374 per CF patient detected, compared with $10,187 per CF patient detected for the IRT protocol. Therefore, we conclude that the IRT/DNA approach to CF newborn screening decreases the number of false-positive subjects contacted, without a significant increase in cost.