Search

There is limited research on the social validity of treatment for pediatric feeding disorders. When it is assessed, the evaluation of treatment acceptability may focus on a few specific procedures or the entire program post‐treatment. This report took place within a home‐based behavior‐analytic treatment model in Australia. Caregivers of eight children (aged 3–11) with pediatric feeding disorders provided treatment acceptability ratings for the full range of treatment procedures, at pre‐ and post‐treatment. Caregivers were also provided the opportunity to provide open‐ended responses. Results showed that caregivers unanimously gave strong ratings of the importance of goals, and preferred that treatment be effective and quick, over minimizing side effects. Procedures experienced by all caregivers (differential attention, tangible reinforcement, nonremoval of the spoon, and re‐presentation) were rated highly at admission and increased at discharge, with the exception of tangible electronics. Caregivers of children receiving additional procedures for acceptance or clean mouth also provided high acceptability ratings for these at both timepoints. This report is the first to examine pre‐ and post‐acceptability measures on the full range of treatment procedures with caregivers experiencing treatment. Results inform future research and will serve to improve efforts to disseminate behavior analysis as an acceptable and effective treatment for pediatric feeding disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous research on general practitioners' (GPs') involvement in end‐of‐life care has largely focused on a specific aspect of care or has provided broad overviews that failed to capture individual variations in patient management. This qualitative study aimed to explore Australian GPs' feedback and reflections on the individual‐level care provided for patients in their last year of life. The findings of the study were drawn from a nation‐wide survey of GPs' experiences in end‐of‐life care. We analysed responses from 63 GPs for 267 of the 272 reported deaths. Factors influencing delivery of optimal end‐of‐life care reported by GPs were categorised into four groups: patient‐related factors, carer‐related factors, interactions between GPs and patients/carer‐related factors and broader health system issues. Each group included both barriers and facilitators. Our study highlighted importance of the emotional dimensions of therapeutic relationships with patients and their family, availability and capacity of family support and smooth communication and continuity of care between GPs and hospitals in delivery of optimal end‐of‐life care. Lack of these facilitators, misconceptions of palliative care and conflicts on implementing care plans among patients and their family tended to impede delivery of such care. On the basis of our findings in the present study and previous literature, we conclude that improved end‐of‐life care in general practice requires comprehensive approaches to supporting both the GP and family to provide care in patients' preferred place, such as enhanced palliative care training and improved availability of external support for GPs, higher levels of hospital‐based services reaching into community settings and broader community‐based resources for families beyond simply the healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Social validity of treatment for paediatric feeding disorders can be defined as the extent to which caregivers find treatment goals and procedures acceptable, and the level of satisfaction with the outcomes of treatment. However, there are few studies which examine social validity data, or that evaluate social validity against key treatment variables. The aim of this report was to compare caregiver ratings of treatment acceptability and satisfaction against treatment variables. Social validity measures were obtained from the caregivers of all children consecutively admitted to a home-based behaviour-analytic treatment programme for paediatric feeding disorders (N = 32) in Australia. All children (M = 6 years, range 2–13 y) had severe feeding problems and most had mealtime skill deficits and autism and developmental delays or intellectual disabilities. Social validity measures included treatment acceptability and satisfaction surveys. In a retrospective analysis, social validity scores were compared against variables including participant characteristics and goals, treatment procedures, and treatment outcome. The retrospective analysis identified no significant correlations. In this sample, caregiver social validity ratings were very high, and data-based treatment outcomes for all children showed high levels of clinical significance including consumption, food variety, and feeding skill development. This report is the first to examine social validity in a data-based manner. With the exception of duration of treatment, no further relations were identified. Whilst the findings may be impacted by little variability/ceiling effects, this further communicates that the empirically-supported treatment for a paediatric feeding disorders is highly effective, and highly valued by caregivers of children. It is recommended that further data-based research continue to examine further measures and determinants of social validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Citizen science connects academic researchers with the public through combined efforts in scientific inquiry. The importance of involving impacted populations in health research is well established. However, how to achieve meaningful participation and the methodological impact of citizen science needs further examination. We examined the feasibility of using citizen science to understand the impact of alcohol advertising on Australian women through a breast cancer prevention project. Two hundred and eighty-two ('participants') citizen scientists completed demographic and behavioural questions via an online survey. The research participants moved into the role of citizen scientists by completing the data collection tasks of capturing and classifying images of alcohol advertising they saw online. Interrater reliability tests found high levels of agreement between citizen scientists and academic researchers with the classification of alcohol advertising brand (Kappa = 0.964, p  < 0.001) and image type (Kappa = 0.936, p  < 0.000). The citizen scientists were women aged 18 and over, with 62% between 35 and 55 years old. The majority were from major cities (78%), had attained a bachelor's degree or higher-level education (62%) and were recruited via email or Facebook (86%). The use of citizen science provided methodological gains through the creation of a unique dataset with higher levels of validity than the existing literature, which employed traditional investigator-driven research methodologies. Citizen science enriched the dataset and provided a powerful methodological vehicle to understand an environmental determinant of health. The study illuminates how public participation benefitted the research process, the challenges and the potential for citizen science to improve public health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper represents our collective engagements and productive struggles with queer pedagogical-methodological (im)possibilities across a constellation of educational contexts. Following in the footsteps of queer theorists-pedagogues before us, we approach queerness as a horizon, a unique opportunity to experiment, take risks, explore new forms of undoing and to move-be-think-do otherwise. We begin by attending to the ways in which researcherseducators in the field of sexualities and schooling are pushing these conversations forward, followed by two vignettes from our own work. Our intention in sharing these vignettes is to slow down and expose some of the methodological-pedagogical processes that guide our work, our attempts to stay in the moment that trouble creates, and the challenge of staying in that moment to learn from it. This paper suggests that embracing new forms of enquiry, which account for queer methodological-pedagogical sensibilities, requires researcherseducators to actively embrace the failures of their own practice and engage with the contestations of theories that matter/materialise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]