7 results on '"Milne, Richard"'
Search Results
2. Access to new medicines in New Zealand compared to Australia
- Author
-
Wonder, Michael and Milne, Richard
- Published
- 2011
3. Attitudes of publics who are unwilling to donate DNA data for research.
- Author
-
Middleton, Anna, Milne, Richard, Thorogood, Adrian, Kleiderman, Erika, Niemiec, Emilia, Prainsack, Barbara, Farley, Lauren, Bevan, Paul, Steed, Claire, Smith, James, Vears, Danya, Atutornu, Jerome, Howard, Heidi C., and Morley, Katherine I.
- Subjects
- *
DNA , *PERSONALLY identifiable information , *DIAGNOSIS , *OVERWEIGHT persons , *SCIENTISTS - Abstract
With the use of genetic technology, researchers have the potential to inform medical diagnoses and treatment in actionable ways. Accurate variant interpretation is a necessary condition for the utility of genetic technology to unfold. This relies on the ability to access large genomic datasets so that comparisons can be made between variants of interest. This can only be successful if DNA and medical data are donated by large numbers of people to 'research', including clinical, non-profit and for-profit research initiatives, in order to be accessed by scientists and clinicians worldwide. The objective of the 'Your DNA, Your Say' global survey is to explore public attitudes, values and opinions towards willingness to donate and concerns regarding the donation of one's personal data for use by others. Using a representative sample of 8967 English-speaking publics from the UK, the USA, Canada and Australia, we explore the characteristics of people who are unwilling (n = 1426) to donate their DNA and medical information, together with an exploration of their reasons. Understanding this perspective is important for making sense of the interaction between science and society. It also helps to focus engagement initiatives on the issues of concern to some publics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Microsoft gives up on Nokia with writedown.
- Author
-
Waters, Richard and Milne, Richard
- Subjects
MERGERS & acquisitions - Abstract
The article reports on the failed acquisition of the communications and information technology company Nokia Corp. by the technology company Microsoft Corp. in Australia.
- Published
- 2015
5. Global Public Perceptions of Genomic Data Sharing: What Shapes the Willingness to Donate DNA and Health Data?
- Author
-
Middleton A, Milne R, Almarri MA, Anwer S, Atutornu J, Baranova EE, Bevan P, Cerezo M, Cong Y, Critchley C, Fernow J, Goodhand P, Hasan Q, Hibino A, Houeland G, Howard HC, Hussain SZ, Malmgren CI, Izhevskaya VL, Jędrzejak A, Jinhong C, Kimura M, Kleiderman E, Leach B, Liu K, Mascalzoni D, Mendes Á, Minari J, Wang N, Nicol D, Niemiec E, Patch C, Pollard J, Prainsack B, Rivière M, Robarts L, Roberts J, Romano V, Sheerah HA, Smith J, Soulier A, Steed C, Stefànsdóttir V, Tandre C, Thorogood A, Voigt TH, West AV, Yoshizawa G, and Morley KI
- Subjects
- Adult, Americas, Asia, Australia, Europe, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Male, Public Health ethics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Genome, Human, Genomics ethics, Information Dissemination ethics, Sequence Analysis, DNA ethics, Trust psychology
- Abstract
Analyzing genomic data across populations is central to understanding the role of genetic factors in health and disease. Successful data sharing relies on public support, which requires attention to whether people around the world are willing to donate their data that are then subsequently shared with others for research. However, studies of such public perceptions are geographically limited and do not enable comparison. This paper presents results from a very large public survey on attitudes toward genomic data sharing. Data from 36,268 individuals across 22 countries (gathered in 15 languages) are presented. In general, publics across the world do not appear to be aware of, nor familiar with, the concepts of DNA, genetics, and genomics. Willingness to donate one's DNA and health data for research is relatively low, and trust in the process of data's being shared with multiple users (e.g., doctors, researchers, governments) is also low. Participants were most willing to donate DNA or health information for research when the recipient was specified as a medical doctor and least willing to donate when the recipient was a for-profit researcher. Those who were familiar with genetics and who were trusting of the users asking for data were more likely to be willing to donate. However, less than half of participants trusted more than one potential user of data, although this varied across countries. Genetic information was not uniformly seen as different from other forms of health information, but there was an association between seeing genetic information as special in some way compared to other health data and increased willingness to donate. The global perspective provided by our "Your DNA, Your Say" study is valuable for informing the development of international policy and practice for sharing genomic data. It highlights that the research community not only needs to be worthy of trust by the public, but also urgent steps need to be taken to authentically communicate why genomic research is necessary and how data donation, and subsequent sharing, is integral to this., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Members of the public in the USA, UK, Canada and Australia expressing genetic exceptionalism say they are more willing to donate genomic data.
- Author
-
Middleton A, Milne R, Howard H, Niemiec E, Robarts L, Critchley C, Nicol D, Prainsack B, Atutornu J, Vears DF, Smith J, Steed C, Bevan P, Scott ER, Bobe J, Goodhand P, Kleiderman E, Thorogood A, and Morley KI
- Subjects
- Adult, Australia, Canada, Female, Genetic Testing ethics, Genome, Human, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United Kingdom, United States, Genetic Privacy psychology, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Information Dissemination, Public Opinion
- Abstract
Public acceptance is critical for sharing of genomic data at scale. This paper examines how acceptance of data sharing pertains to the perceived similarities and differences between DNA and other forms of personal data. It explores the perceptions of representative publics from the USA, Canada, the UK and Australia (n = 8967) towards the donation of DNA and health data. Fifty-two percent of this public held 'exceptionalist' views about genetics (i.e., believed DNA is different or 'special' compared to other types of medical information). This group was more likely to be familiar with or have had personal experience with genomics and to perceive DNA information as having personal as well as clinical and scientific value. Those with personal experience with genetics and genetic exceptionalist views were nearly six times more likely to be willing to donate their anonymous DNA and medical information for research than other respondents. Perceived harms from re-identification did not appear to dissuade publics from being willing to participate in research. The interplay between exceptionalist views about genetics and the personal, scientific and clinical value attributed to data would be a valuable focus for future research.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia.
- Author
-
Milne R, Morley KI, Howard H, Niemiec E, Nicol D, Critchley C, Prainsack B, Vears D, Smith J, Steed C, Bevan P, Atutornu J, Farley L, Goodhand P, Thorogood A, Kleiderman E, and Middleton A
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Canada, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Genomics methods, Humans, Information Dissemination methods, Male, Middle Aged, United Kingdom, United States, Young Adult, Databases, Genetic standards, Genetic Research, Genomics ethics, Information Dissemination ethics, Trust
- Abstract
Trust may be important in shaping public attitudes to genetics and intentions to participate in genomics research and big data initiatives. As such, we examined trust in data sharing among the general public. A cross-sectional online survey collected responses from representative publics in the USA, Canada, UK and Australia (n = 8967). Participants were most likely to trust their medical doctor and less likely to trust other entities named. Company researchers were least likely to be trusted. Low, Variable and High Trust classes were defined using latent class analysis. Members of the High Trust class were more likely to be under 50 years, male, with children, hold religious beliefs, have personal experience of genetics and be from the USA. They were most likely to be willing to donate their genomic and health data for clinical and research uses. The Low Trust class were less reassured than other respondents by laws preventing exploitation of donated information. Variation in trust, its relation to areas of concern about the use of genomic data and potential of legislation are considered. These findings have relevance for efforts to expand genomic medicine and data sharing beyond those with personal experience of genetics or research participants.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.