Search

Purpose: Romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) as a single agent. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy is widely used as first-line treatment of PTCL; however, it has limited efficacy. Results from a phase Ib and II study showed the feasibility of combining romidepsin with CHOP (Ro-CHOP)., Methods: This study is a randomized phase III study of Ro-CHOP versus CHOP in adult patients with previously untreated PTCL. All patients received CHOP in 3-week cycles for six cycles. Romidepsin, 12 mg/m 2 , was administered intravenously over a 4-hour period on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) according to International Working Group 1999 criteria., Results: Between January 2013 and December 2017, 421 patients were enrolled (Ro-CHOP, n = 211; CHOP, n = 210). The median PFS for Ro-CHOP versus CHOP was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 25.8) versus 10.2 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 13.2) with a hazard ratio of 0.81 ( P = .096). In the Ro-CHOP versus CHOP arms, the median overall survival was 51.8 versus 42.9 months and the objective response rate was 63% versus 60% with complete response plus unconfirmed complete response rates of 41% versus 37% ( P > .1 in all comparisons), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥ 30% of patients in the Ro-CHOP arm included thrombocytopenia (50% v 10% in the Ro-CHOP v CHOP arms, respectively), neutropenia (49% v 33%), anemia (47% v 17%), and leukopenia (32% v 20%)., Conclusion: The addition of romidepsin to CHOP did not improve PFS, response rates, nor overall survival and increased the frequency for grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Ro-CHOP does not represent a significant advance in the standard of care for patients with previously untreated PTCL., Competing Interests: Emmanuel BachyHonoraria: Gilead Sciences, Roche, Amgen, Janssen-CilagConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, TakedaResearch Funding: Amgen Foundation (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte Vincent CamusHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: RocheResearch Funding: iQone Healthcare (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Roche Catherine ThieblemontHonoraria: Celgene, AbbVie, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, Incyte, Novartis, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Kite/Gilead, Novartis David SibonConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, iQone Healthcare, Janssen, Roche, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Janssen René-Olivier CasasnovasHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, IncyteResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Takeda (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Loïc YsebaertHonoraria: AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), Janssen-Cilag (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst) Gandhi DamajConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, iQoneResearch Funding: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: PFIZEE, Roche/Genentech, AbbVie Stéphanie GuidezConsulting or Advisory Role: Kite/GileadTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen Marc AndréConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, BMSiResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Roche (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene, Gilead Sciences Alejandro Martín García-SanchoHonoraria: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Servier, Gilead Sciences, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Celgene, MorphoSys, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, iQone, EUSA Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Servier, IncyteExpert Testimony: Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene¸ Servier Maria Jesus PenarrubiaHonoraria: AbbVie, Celgene, Servier, Takeda, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Celgene, AbbVie, Takeda, Clinigen GroupResearch Funding: CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, Takeda Philipp B. StaberHonoraria: Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Abbott/AbbVie, Janssen Oncology, Incyte, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, MSD Oncology, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Roche (Inst) Judith TrotmanResearch Funding: BeiGene (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Janssen-Cilag (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Celgene (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech Andreas HüttmannHonoraria: TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Pharma AG Philippe GaulardHonoraria: Takeda, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: TakedaResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Innate Pharma (Inst), Sanofi (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Marie-Helene Delfau-LarueHonoraria: Gilead Sciences, AmgenResearch Funding: Roche, CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Mundipharma Laurence de LevalHonoraria: Novartis (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Lunaphore Technologies (Inst), Bayer (Inst) Michel MeignanHonoraria: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Ju LiEmployment: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene Franck MorschhauserConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Epizyme, ServierSpeakers' Bureau: RocheExpert Testimony: Roche/Genentech Richard DelarueEmployment: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGeneNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The settlement of Sahul, the lost continent of Oceania, remains one of the most ancient and debated human migrations. Modern New Guineans inherited a unique genetic diversity tracing back 50,000 years, and yet there is currently no model reconstructing their past population dynamics. We generated 58 new whole-genome sequences from Papua New Guinea, filling geographical gaps in previous sampling, specifically to address alternative scenarios of the initial migration to Sahul and the settlement of New Guinea. Here, we present the first genomic models for the settlement of northeast Sahul considering one or two migrations from Wallacea. Both models fit our data set, reinforcing the idea that ancestral groups to New Guinean and Indigenous Australians split early, potentially during their migration in Wallacea where the northern route could have been favored. The earliest period of human presence in Sahul was an era of interactions and gene flow between related but already differentiated groups, from whom all modern New Guineans, Bismarck islanders, and Indigenous Australians descend. The settlement of New Guinea was probably initiated from its southeast region, where the oldest archaeological sites have been found. This was followed by two migrations into the south and north lowlands that ultimately reached the west and east highlands. We also identify ancient gene flows between populations in New Guinea, Australia, East Indonesia, and the Bismarck Archipelago, emphasizing the fact that the anthropological landscape during the early period of Sahul settlement was highly dynamic rather than the traditional view of extensive isolation., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.)

New Guineans represent one of the oldest locally continuous populations outside Africa, harboring among the greatest linguistic and genetic diversity on the planet. Archeological and genetic evidence suggest that their ancestors reached Sahul (present day New Guinea and Australia) by at least 55,000 years ago (kya). However, little is known about this early settlement phase or subsequent dispersal and population structuring over the subsequent period of time. Here we report 379 complete Papuan mitochondrial genomes from across Papua New Guinea, which allow us to reconstruct the phylogenetic and phylogeographic history of northern Sahul. Our results support the arrival of two groups of settlers in Sahul within the same broad time window (50-65 kya), each carrying a different set of maternal lineages and settling Northern and Southern Sahul separately. Strong geographic structure in northern Sahul remains visible today, indicating limited dispersal over time despite major climatic, cultural, and historical changes. However, following a period of isolation lasting nearly 20 ky after initial settlement, environmental changes postdating the Last Glacial Maximum stimulated diversification of mtDNA lineages and greater interactions within and beyond Northern Sahul, to Southern Sahul, Wallacea and beyond. Later, in the Holocene, populations from New Guinea, in contrast to those of Australia, participated in early interactions with incoming Asian populations from Island Southeast Asia and continuing into Oceania.