Search

Background Both implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have a positive impact on survival in the heart failure population. We sought to determine whether these positive effects on survival are additive or whether LVAD therapy supersedes ICD therapy. Method We analyzed survival data of patients implanted with nonpulsatile LVADs between October 2004 and March 2013. Survival in patients with ICDs (n = 64) was compared to those without ICDs (n = 36). Patients exited the study at the time of heart transplantation or death. Results A total of 100 patients underwent LVAD implantation during this time. Patients had a mean follow-up time of 364 ± 295 days. Death occurred in 15 (38%) patients in the no ICD group versus 18 (30%) in the ICD group. Univariate analysis demonstrated a marginal early survival benefit at up to 1 year post-LVAD implant in the ICD cohort; however, at time points greater than 1 year there was no statistically significant benefit in ICD therapy in LVAD patients (P = 0.56). Multivariate analysis did not show any significant predictor of survival. There were no patients who died of sudden cardiac death. There was no significant difference in the time to heart transplantation (443 days ± 251 no ICD vs 372 days ± 277 ICD, P = 0.37). Conclusion The benefit of ICD therapy in the setting of continuous flow LVAD therapy is uncertain. Although prolonged ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) may potentially impact on patient survival, LVAD therapy is beneficial in prevention of sudden cardiac death due to VAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cold static storage preservation of donor hearts for periods longer than 4 hours increases the risk of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). The aim of the study was to determine if hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) could safely prolong the preservation time of donor hearts., Methods: We conducted a nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter investigation of the effect of HOPE using the XVIVO Heart Preservation System on donor hearts with a projected preservation time of 6 to 8 hours on 30-day recipient survival and allograft function post-transplant. Each center completed 1 or 2 short preservation time followed by long preservation time cases. PGD was classified as occurring in the first 24 hours after transplantation or secondary graft dysfunction (SGD) occurring at any time with a clearly defined cause. Trial survival was compared with a comparator group based on data from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry., Results: We performed heart transplants using 7 short and 29 long preservation time donor hearts placed on the HOPE system. The mean preservation time for the long preservation time cases was 414 minutes, the longest being 8 hours and 47 minutes. There was 100% survival at 30 days. One long preservation time recipient developed PGD, and 1 developed SGD. One short preservation time patient developed SGD. Thirty day survival was superior to the ISHLT comparator group despite substantially longer preservation times in the trial patients., Conclusions: HOPE provides effective preservation out to preservation times of nearly 9 hours allowing retrieval from remote geographic locations., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)