Search

Background: There are limited management options available for people with Type III intestinal failure (IF), with home parenteral nutrition (HPN) being the main treatment option. The aim of this research is to compare patient preferences in managing Type III IF using time trade-off (TTO) methodology and to determine which factors have the greatest impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).Methods: An interviewer-administered telephone survey was conducted on a cross-sectional cohort of 19 HPN participants. The survey was designed to measure HRQoL using a TTO methodology. Four different treatment options were presented, and participants decided how many years of life they would trade to have access to the treatment and hence a different health state. The 4 scenarios included reduction in line infections, optimization of care, small bowel growth (teduglutide), and intestinal transplantation. Health state utility scores were calculated.Results: The median health utility score for optimization of care and small bowel growth (teduglutide) were lowest (0.5; range 0-1) meaning a greater desire for this treatment. Intestinal transplant had the highest median utility score (1.0; range 0-1) indicating less willingness for this treatment option.Conclusions: This is the first known study to use TTO methodology assessing treatment options in people with IF requiring HPN. Results indicate people requiring HPN make careful decisions when considering treatment options. Facilities providing HPN services should focus on optimization of current care, which is highly valued by their patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Home parenteral nutrition-quality of life (HPN-QOL © ) is a self-assessment tool for the measurement of QOL in patients on HPN. The aims of this study were: to re-assess the basic psychometric properties of the HPN-QOL © in a multinational sample of adult patients; to provide a description of QOL dimensions by short and long HPN treatment duration; to explore clinical factors potentially associated to QOL scores., Methods: Patients (n = 699) from 14 countries completed the HPN-QOL © . The questionnaires were analysed to evaluate data completeness, convergent/discriminant validity and internal-consistency reliability. The association of overall QOL and HPN treatment duration as well as other clinical factors were investigated using multivariable linear regression models., Results: The analysis of the multitrait-scaling and internal consistency indicates a good fit with the questionnaire structure for most items. Item discriminant validity correlation was satisfactory and psychometric evaluation of the HPN-QOL © in the different English, French and Italian language patient sub-groups confirmed psychometric equivalence of the three questionnaire versions. The results of the multivariable linear regression showed that QOL scores were significantly associated with HPN duration (better in long-term), underlying disease (better in Crohn's disease and mesenteric ischaemia) and living status (worse in living alone) and, after adjusting for the other factors, with the number of days of HPN infusion per week., Conclusions: The HPN-QOL © , is a valid tool for measurement of QOL in patients on HPN, to be used in the clinical practice as well as in research., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)