Search

Introduction: Clear and effective communication is vital in discussions regarding coronary revascularization. Language barriers may limit communication in healthcare settings. Previous studies on the influence of language barriers on the outcomes of patients receiving coronary revascularization have produced conflicting results. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate and synthesise the existing evidence regarding the effects of language barrier on the outcomes of patients receiving coronary revascularization., Methods: A systematic review was conducted, including a search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases on 01/10/2022. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. This review was also prospectively registered on PROSPERO., Results: Searches identified 3983 articles of which a total 12 studies were included in the review. Most studies describe that language barriers result in delayed presentation, but not delays in treatment following hospital arrival with respect to coronary revascularization. The findings with respect to the likelihood of receiving revascularization have varied significantly; however, some studies have indicated that those with language barriers may be less likely to receive revascularization. There have been some conflicting results with respect to the association between language barrier and mortality. However, most studies suggest that there is no association with increased mortality. In studies that evaluated length of stay variable results have been reported based on geographical location. Namely Australian studies have suggested no association between language barrier and length of stay, but Canadian studies support an association. Language barriers may also be associated with readmissions following discharge, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients with language barriers may have poorer outcomes from coronary revascularization. Future interventional studies will be required to consider the sociocultural context of patients with language barriers, and may be targeted at timepoints including prior to, during, or after hospitalisation for coronary revascularization. Further examination of the adverse health outcomes of those with language barriers in fields outside of coronary revascularization are required in view of the stark inequities identified in this field., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Given the ageing population and uptake of transcatheter approaches for treating aortic stenosis (AS), a renewed evaluation of outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is warranted. With guidelines recommending age-based indications for surgical and transcatheter approaches, this study critically evaluates outcomes in age-based subgroups, with the aim to refine management of AS in the elderly, where there is often no clear consensus., Methods: Six hundred and thirteen consecutive patients who underwent SAVR in an Australian tertiary cardiac centre between 1 June 2014 and 13 January 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Of these, 70.31% were <75 years (Group 1) and 29.69% were ≥75 years (Group 2). Groups were compared with respect to early and long-term outcomes. Logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed for all patients and an AS-specific sub-group., Results: Patients aged ≥75 years were more likely to be female and have hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and pre-existing arrhythmia (P < 0.001). Group 1 experienced a higher incidence of renal failure compared with Group 2, in the overall cohort and AS-specific subgroup (P = 0.02). The incidence of stroke was similar between groups, in the overall cohort (P = 0.22) and the AS-specific subgroup (P = 0.32). Age ≥ 75 was not found to be an independent predictor of 30-day, 1-year or 5-year mortality. Temporal trends revealed low consistently low complication rates., Conclusions: Elderly patients should not be denied surgery based on age, despite guideline-driven age-based recommendations., (© 2023 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)