Search

Background/objectives: Sequential digital dermoscopic imaging (SDDI) and total body photography (TBP) are recommended as a two-step surveillance method for individuals at high-risk of developing cutaneous melanoma. Dermoscopic features specific to melanoma have been well described, however, dynamic changes on serial imaging are less understood. This study aims to identify and compare dermoscopic features in developing melanomas and benign naevi that underwent SDDI and TBP to understand which dermoscopic features may be associated with a malignant change., Method: Histopathology reports from a private specialist dermatology clinic from January 2007 to December 2019 were reviewed. Histopathologically confirmed melanoma and benign naevi that underwent SDDI and TBP with a minimum follow-up interval of 3 months were included., Results: Eighty-nine melanomas (38.2% invasive, median Breslow thickness 0.35 mm, range: 0.2-1.45 mm) and 48 benign naevi were evaluated by three experienced dermatologists for dermoscopic changes. Features most strongly associated with melanoma included the development of neovascularisation, asymmetry and growth in pigment network, additional colours, shiny white structures, regression, structureless areas and change to a multi-component pattern. The presence of atypical vessels (p = 0.02) and shiny white structures (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with invasive melanoma., Conclusion: Evaluation for certain evolving dermoscopic features in melanocytic lesions monitored by SDDI and TBP is efficient in assisting clinical decision making. SDDI with TBP is an effective tool for early detection of melanoma., (© 2023 The Australasian College of Dermatologists.)

Background: Teledermoscopy is a rapidly developing field of dermatology with studies demonstrating excellent agreement with face-to-face diagnosis. However, we are unaware of studies evaluating interobserver variability in diagnosis between dermatologists from different continents. This evaluation is important to determine the robustness of teledermoscopy and allow comparisons to be made between different studies., Objectives: To assess the interobserver diagnostic variability between five independent experienced dermatologists (A-E) in New Zealand, Australia and the U.S.A., Methods: Images from 979 lesions from 206 patients were distributed to five dermatologists. The lesions were viewed and diagnoses recorded using MoleMap Diagnose (MoleMap, Auckland, New Zealand) software. The diagnoses were analysed for interobserver variability., Results: There was excellent agreement between four of five dermatologists (A-D) for lesions that were agreed upon as melanoma (κ = 0·81-0·97) and benign naevus (κ = 0·77-0·82).The fifth dermatologist (E) made a more frequent diagnosis of atypical naevus and melanoma than the others. For nonmelanocytic lesions, there was moderate to very good agreement for seborrhoeic keratosis (κ = 0·64-0·80) and basal cell carcinoma (κ = 0·55-0·67), but poor agreement for invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (κ = 0·05-0·15). Agreement for actinic keratosis (κ = 0·32-0·67) and SCC in situ (κ = 0·15-0·32) was only moderate. When atypical and benign naevi were grouped together and actinic keratosis and SCC in situ grouped together, there was better agreement among all dermatologists. There was good ability to distinguish malignant from benign lesions (κ = 0·57-0·93)., Conclusions: There was good agreement among dermatologists A-D but dermatologist E varied from the group with more frequent diagnosis of melanoma and atypical naevus. This difference could be due to different definition of terms with lack of consensus guidelines in definition of atypical naevus, lack of familiarity with the specific patient population and/or diagnostic drift., (© 2010 The Authors. BJD © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists.)