Search

The relationship between Australian political and social history has received little historiographical attention. Political history has been lauded or, more often, dismissed as traditional historical practice, while from the 1960s social history took its place as a catch-all phrase for various “new” histories concerned with everyday life. This article examines the place of political and social history in the nascent Australian academic historical profession of the 1950s to the early 1970s, and then explores the impact of the new social history on academic political history. It will suggest that while there was only limited exchange before the late 1980s, in the last twenty years social history has contributed modestly to a reconstituted understanding of political history as part of lived experience. “[...] I can read poetry and plays, and things of that sort, and do not dislike travels. But history, real solemn history, I cannot be interested in. Can you?” “Yes, I am fond of history.” “I wish I were too. I read it a little as a duty, but it tells me nothing that does not either vex or weary me. The quarrels of popes and kings, with wars or pestilences, in every page; the men all so good for nothing, and hardly any women at all — it is very tiresome: and yet I often think it odd that it should be so dull, for a great deal of it must be invention [...]”. 1 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been a considerable increase in the number of political histories written by journalists since the 1960s. Three types of journalistic political histories have emerged in this period: the quickie, the longer history and the investigative work, and the works of Warren Denning, Alan Reid and Paul Kelly have been particularly influential in the development of the genre's present characteristics and concerns. This article finds that the genre's increase is the result of a combination of factors: the expansion of a tertiary-educated readership; the introduction of university training for journalists; increasing economic pressures faced by publishers, and the rise of celebrity culture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents an interview with historian Ross Fitzgerald. He discussed his paper "Writing Contemporary History in Australia." He also reported how the approach to Australian history writing is changing. He also discussed issues concerning some historic movement in Australia and their impact on history writing.

The article presents information on the authors who contributed to this issue of the journal, including Hilary M. Carey, a Professor of History at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Julie Collins, Collections Manager at the Architecture Museum at the University of South Australia, and Simon Sleight, honorary research associate at the School of Historical Studies at Monash University.