6 results on '"Garduno, A."'
Search Results
2. Hydration and nutrition care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia.
- Author
-
Miller, Colette, Jones, Stephanie P., Bangee, Munirah, Martinez-Garduno, Cintia Mayel, Brady, Marian C., Cadilhac, Dominique A., Dale, Simeon, McInnes, Elizabeth, Middleton, Sandy, Watkins, Caroline L., and Lightbody, C. Elizabeth
- Subjects
HYDRATION ,OCCUPATIONAL roles ,STROKE ,BODY weight ,NUTRITIONAL assessment ,CROSS-sectional method ,PATIENTS ,HOSPITAL admission & discharge ,HOSPITAL care ,RESEARCH funding ,STROKE patients ,HOSPITAL nursing staff ,CRITICAL care medicine ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,NURSES ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,SCALE analysis (Psychology) ,BODY mass index ,PHYSICIANS ,DECISION making in clinical medicine ,DATA analysis software ,PATIENT care ,NUTRITION services ,MEDICAL needs assessment - Abstract
Background: Dehydration and malnutrition are common in hospitalised patients following stroke leading to poor outcomes including increased mortality. Little is known about hydration and nutrition care practices in hospital to avoid dehydration or malnutrition, and how these practices vary in different countries. This study sought to capture how the hydration and nutrition needs of patients' post-stroke are assessed and managed in the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia (AUS). Aim: To examine and compare current in-hospital hydration and nutrition care practice for patients with stroke in the UK and Australia. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between April and November 2019. Questionnaires were mailed to stroke specialist nurses in UK and Australian hospitals providing post-stroke inpatient acute care or rehabilitation. Non-respondents were contacted up to five times. Results: We received 150/174 (86%) completed surveys from hospitals in the UK, and 120/162 (74%) in Australia. Of the 270 responding hospitals, 96% reported undertaking assessment of hydration status during an admission, with nurses most likely to complete assessments (85%). The most common methods of admission assessment were visual assessment of the patient (UK 62%; AUS 58%), weight (UK 52%; AUS 52%), and body mass index (UK 47%; AUS 42%). Almost all (99%) sites reported that nutrition status was assessed at some point during admission, and these were mainly completed by nurses (91%). Use of standardised nutrition screening tools were more common in the UK (91%) than Australia (60%). Similar proportions of hydration management decisions were made by physicians (UK 84%; AUS 83%), and nutrition management decisions by dietitians (UK 98%; AUS 97%). Conclusion: Despite broadly similar hydration and nutrition care practices after stroke in the UK and Australia, some variability was identified. Although nutrition assessment was more often informed by structured screening tools, the routine assessment of hydration was generally not. Nurses were responsible for assessment and monitoring, while dietitians and physicians undertook decision-making regarding management. Hydration care could be improved through the development of standardised assessment tools. This study highlights the need for increased implementation and use of evidence-based protocols in stroke hydration and nutrition care to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Milling it over: Geelong's new life in forgotten places
- Author
-
Gray, Fiona, Freeman, Cristina Garduno, and Novacevski, Matt
- Published
- 2017
4. Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia.
- Author
-
Bangee, Munirah, Martinez-Garduno, Cintia Mayel, Brady, Marian C., Cadilhac, Dominique A., Dale, Simeon, Hurley, Margaret A., McInnes, Elizabeth, Middleton, Sandy, Patel, Tahera, Watkins, Caroline L., and Lightbody, Elizabeth
- Subjects
- *
NURSES' attitudes , *HEALTH services accessibility , *ORAL hygiene , *TOOTH care & hygiene , *CROSS-sectional method , *PATIENTS , *NURSING practice , *HOSPITAL admission & discharge , *STROKE rehabilitation , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *HOSPITAL nursing staff , *CRITICAL care medicine , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *RESEARCH funding , *STROKE patients , *DATA analysis software , *EMAIL - Abstract
Aims: To examine current practice, perceptions of healthcare professionals and factors affecting provision for oral care post-stroke in the UK and Australia. Background: Poor oral care has negative health consequences for people post-stroke. Little is known about oral care practice in hospital for people post-stroke and factors affecting provision in different countries. Design: A cross-sectional survey. Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to stroke specialist nurses in UK and Australian hospitals providing inpatient acute or rehabilitation care post-stroke. The survey was conducted between April and November 2019. Non-respondents were contacted up to five times. Results: Completed questionnaires were received from 150/174 (86%) hospitals in the UK, and 120/162 (74%) in Australia. A total of 52% of UK hospitals and 30% of Australian hospitals reported having a general oral care protocol, with 53% of UK and only 13% of Australian hospitals reporting using oral care assessment tools. Of those using oral care assessment tools, 50% of UK and 38% of Australian hospitals used local hospital-specific tools. Oral care assessments were undertaken on admission in 73% of UK and 57% of Australian hospitals. Staff had received oral care training in the last year in 55% of UK and 30% of Australian hospitals. Inadequate training and education on oral care for pre-registration nurses were reported by 63% of UK and 53% of Australian respondents. Conclusion: Unacceptable variability exists in oral care practices in hospital stroke care settings. Oral care could be improved by increasing training, performing individual assessments on admission, and using standardised assessment tools and protocols to guide high quality care. The study highlights the need for incorporating staff training and the use of oral care standardised assessments and protocols in stroke care in order to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Testing a systematic approach to identify and prioritise barriers to successful implementation of a complex healthcare intervention.
- Author
-
Craig, Louise E., Churilov, Leonid, Olenko, Liudmyla, Cadilhac, Dominique A., Grimley, Rohan, Dale, Simeon, Martinez-Garduno, Cintia, McInnes, Elizabeth, Considine, Julie, Grimshaw, Jeremy M., and Middleton, Sandy
- Subjects
MEDICAL care ,STROKE patients ,PATHOLOGY ,BLOOD sugar ,THROMBOLYTIC therapy ,STROKE diagnosis ,STROKE treatment ,ACETAMINOPHEN ,EMERGENCY medical services ,HOSPITAL emergency services ,HYPOGLYCEMIC agents ,INSULIN ,STROKE ,MEDICAL triage ,DISCHARGE planning ,TRANSPORTATION of patients ,NONOPIOID analgesics - Abstract
Background: Multiple barriers may inhibit the adoption of clinical interventions and impede successful implementation. Use of standardised methods to prioritise barriers to target when selecting implementation interventions is an understudied area of implementation research. The aim of this study was to describe a method to identify and prioritise barriers to the implementation of clinical practice elements which were used to inform the development of the T3 trial implementation intervention (Triage, Treatment [thrombolysis administration; monitoring and management of temperature, blood glucose levels, and swallowing difficulties] and Transfer of stroke patients from Emergency Departments [ED]).Methods: A survey was developed based on a literature review and data from a complementary trial to identify the commonly reported barriers for the nine T3 clinical care elements. This was administered via a web-based questionnaire to a purposive sample of Australian multidisciplinary clinicians and managers in acute stroke care. The questionnaire addressed barriers to each of the nine T3 trial clinical care elements. Participants produced two ranked lists: on their perception of: firstly, how influential each barrier was in preventing clinicians from performing the clinical care element (influence attribute); and secondly how difficult the barrier was to overcome (difficulty attribute). The rankings for both influence and difficulty were combined to classify the barriers according to three categories ('least desirable', desirable' or 'most desirable' to target) to assist interpretation.Results: All invited participants completed the survey; (n = 17; 35% medical, 35% nursing, 18% speech pathology, 12% bed managers). The barriers classified as most desirable to target and overcome were a 'lack of protocols for the management of fever' and 'not enough blood glucose monitoring machines'.Conclusions: A structured decision-support procedure has been illustrated and successfully applied to identify and prioritise barriers to target within an implementation intervention. This approach may prove to be a useful in other studies and as an adjunct to undertaking barrier assessments within individual sites when planning implementation interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Photosharing on Flickr: intangible heritage and emergent publics.
- Author
-
Garduno Freeman, Cristina
- Subjects
- *
WEBSITES , *HISTORIC sites , *SOCIAL networks - Abstract
This paper argues that Flickr, a popular 'photosharing' website, is facilitating new public engagements with world heritage sites like the Sydney Opera House. Australian heritage institutions (namely libraries and museums) have recently begun to employ Flickr as a site through which to engage communities with their photographic archives and collections. Yet Flickr is more than an 'online photo album': it is a social and cultural network generated around personal photographic practices. Members can form 'groups': self-organised communities defined by shared interests in places, photographic genres, or the appraisal of photographs. These groups are public spaces for both visual and textual conversations - complex social negotiations involving personal expression and collective identity. For one group, the common interest is the Sydney Opera House, and their shared visual and textual expressions - representations of this building. This paper argues that such socio-visual practices themselves constitute an intangible heritage. By drawing on the work of scholars Jose Van Dijck and Nancy Van House, Dawson Munjeri and Michael Warner, the paper proposes that this enactment of intangible heritage is implicated in the broader cultural value of the Sydney Opera House. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.