Search

Background: Femoral shaft fractures are one of the most common injuries in multiple trauma patients. Due to their prognostic relevance, there is an ongoing controversial discussion as to the optimal treatment strategy in terms of Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO) and Early Total Care (ETC). We aimed to describe the differences in fracture management and clinical outcome of multiple trauma patients with concomitant femoral shaft fractures treated at a German and an Australian level I trauma centre using the same inclusion criteria., Methods: Polytraumatized patients (ISS ≥ 16) with a femoral shaft fracture aged ≥ 16 years treated at a German and an Australian trauma centre between 2003 and 2007 were included. According to ETC and DCO management principles, we evaluated demographic parameters as well as posttraumatic complications and clinical outcome., Results: Seventy-three patients were treated at the German and 134 patients at the Australian trauma centre. DCO was performed in case of increased injury severity in both hospitals. Prolonged mechanical ventilation time, and length of ICU and hospital stay were demonstrated in DCO treatment regardless of the trauma centre. No differences concerning posttraumatic complications and survival were found between both centres. Survival of patients after DCO was similar to those managed using ETC despite a greater severity of injury and lower probability of survival. There was no difference in the incidence of ARDS. DCO was, however, associated with a greatly increased length of time on mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the ICU., Conclusion: We found no differences concerning patient demographics or clinical outcomes in terms of incidence of ARDS, MODS, or mortality. As such, we propose that comparability between German and Australian trauma populations is justified. Despite a higher ISS in the DCO group, there were no differences in posttraumatic complications and survival depending on ETC or DCO treatment. Further research is required to confirm whether this is the case with other countries, too., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Due to the development of trauma care systems the treatment results of multiply injured patients have clearly improved during the last decades. More sophisticated preclinical algorithms, standardized procedures in the emergency room, calculated surgical strategies during the early phases and the subsequent intensive care (ICU) treatment as well as the implementation of trauma registries have all contributed to an improvement in trauma care. Different national trauma care systems have been developed due to the structural, geographic and demographic differences of the compared countries. However, large financial resources are required to maintain all three trauma care systems. To cope with financial losses in multiple trauma care, huge efforts of all the personnel involved are necessary to maintain the maximum treatment quality. In this context, national trauma registries, as well as the recently established trauma networks in Germany, might be helpful. Due to improvements in comprehensive trauma care and identification of expensive, but not prognosis improving treatment strategies, costs can be reduced by trauma registries and trauma networks.

Background: Cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) are important hemodynamic parameters in emergency patients and for clinical early goal-directed therapy. This study evaluated the feasibility of CO and SVR determination using preclinical continuous wave Doppler ultrasound in a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) on emergency patients presenting with or without thoracic pain as a pilot observational study., Methods: Forty-four consecutive medical emergency patients (62.8 +/- 22 years of age, 23 males) were classified at the scene as with (15 patients, 69 +/- 14 years of age, 40% male) or without (29 patients, 60 +/- 25 years of age, 59% male) thoracic pain by an emergency physician. Hemodynamic parameters were determined based on continuous wave Doppler noninvasively (USCOM, Sydney, Australia): stroke volume (SV), CO, cardiac index (CI), minute distance (MD), and SVR., Results: Noninvasive SV, MD, CO, CI, and SVR determination is feasible using preclinical ultrasound in HEMS. Thoracic pain patients had higher SVR (2,709 +/- 891 vs 1,499 +/- 661 dyne*sec*cm-5) and lower CO/CI (3.37 +/- 1.1 vs 5.06 +/- 2.9 L/min, CI: 1.67 +/- 0.58 vs 3.18 +/- 1.34 L/min/m2) as well as a reduced aortic minute distance (11.2 +/- 3.3 m/min vs 19.1 +/- 8 m/min, P = .001) than patients without thoracic pain. Highest cardiac outputs were measured during and within 30 minutes after seizures (n = 5, 7.5 +/- 3.05 L/min). The range of CO measured in six cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients was 2.7 to 12 L/min; the level of CO was not associated with the establishing of sustained circulation., Conclusions: Determining SV, CO/CI, and SVR in different emergency situations in HEMS using rapid CW Doppler ultrasound is feasible. Thoracic pain patients have increased SVR and lower CO/CI and reduced aortic minute distance than do non-thoracic pain patients in the preclinical setting.