Search

Aim: Here, we present results of a survey of scabies prevalence in childcare centres and primary schools in Auckland. Methods: Children whose parents agreed to take part in participating centres in the Auckland region were examined for scabies by general practitioners and given questionnaires of relevant symptoms. Diagnoses of clinical or suspected scabies were made according to the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) criteria. The survey was a stratified random sample of schools and early childcare centres. A quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was also used to complement the IACS criteria. Results: A total of 181 children were examined, with 145 children with history information, 16 of whom (11.0%) met the criteria for 'clinical' or 'suspected' scabies. Weighted analysis, accounting for the survey design, indicated that the prevalence of scabies in early childcare centres was 13.2% (95% CI: 4.3 to 22.1), with no school‐aged children fulfilling these criteria. A higher proportion had clinical signs of scabies with 23 (12.7%) having typical scabies lesions and a further 43 (23.8%) had atypical lesions. A total of 64 PCR tests were taken and 15 (23%) were positive. None of these cases were receiving treatment for scabies. Five were undergoing topical skin treatment: three with topical steroid and two with calamine lotion. Conclusions: The prevalence of children with scabies is high in early childcare centres in Auckland. Misdiagnosis is suggested by several PCR positive cases being treated by topical agents used to treat other skin conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The first consultation with a depressed patient is important because many patients do not return for subsequent visits. Therefore, the first consultation provides a unique opportunity for diagnosis (if required) and treatment, but there are risks of both under and over-diagnosis. Aim: To understand how general practitioners utilize diagnosis when patients present with a new episode of depression. Method: We approached a random selection of twenty-one general practitioners (GPs) in Auckland, New Zealand and asked them to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. The interviews explored "the first consultation for a depressed/distressed patient" were undertaken to theme saturation. Interviews were hand-written and later transcribed. Results: We identified three major themes in GPs' approach to diagnosis. The issue of diagnosis was underpinned by a complex understanding of depression and the GP role. GPs did not always make a formal diagnosis, but the experience of a patient's distress/depression was understood by drawing on a range of factors and resources. These included time, screening tools, clinician experience, and patient affect. GPs were careful about how they communicated a diagnosis, both in their documentation and in their conversations with patients. Conclusion: At an initial appointment, the distressed/depressed patient can present to their GP with various symptoms and differing degrees of distress. GPs draw upon a variety of skills and resources to negotiate these complexities. The value of a diagnosis was questioned and issues such as impairment may be more useful concepts for GPs. This is the first study to report the findings of the first visit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The first primary care consultation for patients with depression can have long-term consequences for patients, but little is known about treatment decisions at this visit. The aim of this study was to explore the treatment of patients presenting in primary care with a new episode of depression and the drivers behind GPs' treatment decisions at the initial consultation. Materials and Methods: A random sample of GPs in Auckland was invited to participate. A qualitative study was undertaken using semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a general inductive approach. Results: Twenty-one GPs were interviewed. We identified three themes as drivers of treatment decisions at the first visit: characteristics of GPs, characteristics of patients, and characteristics of treatment options. Drivers for prescribing were severe depression and time constraints. A driver for non-pharmacological treatment was a strong doctor–patient relationship. Limited time, skill, and training were associated with low confidence using talking therapies. Access to counseling was reported as poor. There was a very wide range of approaches taken. GPs described preferring antidepressants less and talking therapies more with Mčori patients. Behavioral activation was used least despite its ease of use and it being one of the most effective treatments for depression. Conclusion: Treatment of depression at the first visit varies widely between practitioners. GPs report multiple barriers to the provision of talking therapies. A move to a more standardized approach may lead to more equitable care. This is the first study to report findings about the initial primary care consultation for depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]