1. Universal versus selective screening for the detection, control and prognosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Argentina.
- Author
-
McCarthy AD, Curciarello R, Castiglione N, Tayeldín MF, Costa D, Arnol V, Prospitti A, Aliano A, Archuby D, Graieb A, Torres MJ, Etcheverry SB, and Apezteguía MC
- Subjects
- Adult, Argentina epidemiology, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational prevention & control, Diabetes, Gestational therapy, Female, Humans, Mass Screening methods, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Prevalence, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Diabetes, Gestational diagnosis, Diabetes, Gestational epidemiology
- Abstract
In all, 1,702 unselected pregnant women from the city of La Plata were tested for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and evaluated to determine GDM prevalence and risk factors. In women with GDM, we evaluated compliance with guidelines for GDM management, and perinatal complications attributable to GDM. GDM prevalence was 5.8%, and its risk factors were pre-gestational obesity, previous hyperglycaemia, age > 30 years, previous GDM (and its surrogate markers). In primi-gravida (PG) subjects, GDM was equally prevalent in the presence (4.2%) or absence (4.0%) of risk factors. In multi-gravida (MG) women, although risk factors doubled the prevalence of GDM (8.6%), in the absence of risk factors GDM prevalence was similar to that of PG women (3.9%). Half of all women with GDM received inadequate post-diagnosis obstetric control, and this induced a fourfold increase in infant perinatal complications. In conclusion, all non-hyperglycaemic 24-28-week pregnant women should be tested for GDM, although particular attention must be paid to MG women with risk factors.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF