Search

The response of the ozone column across Europe to the extreme 2020 Arctic ozone depletion was examined by analyzing ground‐based observations at 38 European stations. The ozone decrease at the northernmost site, Ny‐Ålesund (79°N) was about 43% with respect to a climatology of more than 30 years. The magnitude of the decrease declined by about 0.7% deg−1 moving south to reach nearly 15% at 40°N. In addition, it was found that the variations of the ozone column at each of the selected stations in March‐May were similar to those observed at Ny‐Ålesund but with a delay increasing to about 20 days at mid‐latitudes with a gradient of approximately 0.5 days deg−1. The distributions of reconstructed ozone column anomalies over a sector covering a large European area show decreasing ozone that started from the north at the beginning of April 2020 and spread south. Such behavior was shown to be similar to that observed after the Arctic ozone depletion in 2011. Stratospheric dynamical patterns in March–May 2011 and during 2020 suggested that the migration of ozone‐poor air masses from polar areas to the south after the vortex breakup caused the observed ozone responses. A brief survey of the ozone mass mixing ratios at three stratospheric levels showed the exceptional strength of the 2020 episode. Despite the stronger and longer‐lasting Arctic ozone loss in 2020, the analysis in this work indicates a similar ozone response at latitudes below 50°N to both 2011 and 2020 phenomena. Plain Language Summary: The winter polar vortex isolates a huge volume of air from external impacts that, in the absence of the sunlight, leads to a great deal of cooling and the formation of polar stratospheric clouds. Chemical reactions taking place in these clouds contribute to ozone destruction. Such spring‐time ozone depletions are regularly observed in Antarctica, but usually do not occur in the Arctic where the vortex is much less intense. However, in the past three decades several similar episodes occurred in the Arctic and the most marked of them took place in the 2011 and 2020 springs. The response of the ozone layer over Europe to the 2020 episode was studied here by analyzing the data from 38 ground measurement stations. It was found that there was a nearly 43% decrease in ozone in the Arctic, and, as it spread southward, a reduction of 15% in mid‐latitudes 15–20 days later. This spread was attributed to the transport of ozone‐poor air from the Arctic to the south after the vortex breakup. Despite the stronger depletion in 2020 and some differences in the movement of air, the response of the ozone layer was quite similar in the springs of both 2011 and 2020. Key Points: The 2020 ozone depletion in the Arctic was found to impact the ozone in the mid‐latitude European areasThe magnitude of ozone decrease in the southern regions declined with respect to that in the Arctic and occurred with a delay up to 20 daysSuch a response was similar to that observed in 2011 and both were considered a result of ozone‐poor air masses transported southward [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Arctic winter 2007-08 was characterized by cold temperatures and a strong vortex. Potentials for large areas of ice and Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs) are observed during the winter. A vortex wide denitrification (removal of 60-80% of NOy) and intense chlorine activation (0.6 to 1.05 ppb of ClO) are found inside the vortex at 475 K. This chemical morphology triggered a high rate of ozone loss during the winter. The simulated results from MIMOSA-CHIM show a large loss of ozone at 425-550 K from January to March, about 1.5-2.3 ppm. The vortex averaged loss at 475 K is about 2.5 ppm in mid-March, which is in very good agreement with the estimated loss (2.3 ppm) from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) measurements. Similar analyses from MIMOSA-CHIM for recent winters show a cumulative loss of 2.1 ppm in 2006-07 and 2.0 ppm in 2004-05 in tune with the measurements. The measured and simulated results show the highest loss in 2007-08 in comparison with the analyses for the last four winters at 475 K. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simulations of polar ozone losses were performed using the three-dimensional high-resolution (1∘ × 1∘) chemical transport model MIMOSA-CHIM. Three Arctic winters 1999–2000, 2001–2002, 2002–2003 and three Antarctic winters 2001, 2002, and 2003 were considered for the study. The cumulative ozone loss in the Arctic winter 2002–2003 reached around 35% at 475 K inside the vortex, as compared to more than 60% in 1999–2000. During 1999–2000, denitrification induces a maximum of about 23% extra ozone loss at 475 K as compared to 17% in 2002–2003. Unlike these two colder Arctic winters, the 2001–2002 Arctic was warmer and did not experience much ozone loss. Sensitivity tests showed that the chosen resolution of 1∘ × 1∘ provides a better evaluation of ozone loss at the edge of the polar vortex in high solar zenith angle conditions. The simulation results for ozone, ClO, HNO3, N2O, and NO y for winters 1999–2000 and 2002–2003 were compared with measurements on board ER-2 and Geophysica aircraft respectively. Sensitivity tests showed that increasing heating rates calculated by the model by 50% and doubling the PSC (Polar Stratospheric Clouds) particle density (from 5 × 10−3 to 10−2 cm−3) refines the agreement with in situ ozone, N2O and NO y levels. In this configuration, simulated ClO levels are increased and are in better agreement with observations in January but are overestimated by about 20% in March. The use of the Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections slightly increases further ClO levels especially in high solar zenith angle conditions. Comparisons of the modelled ozone values with ozonesonde measurement in the Antarctic winter 2003 and with Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM III) measurements in the Antarctic winters 2001 and 2002, shows that the simulations underestimate the ozone loss rate at the end of the ozone destruction period. A slightly better agreement is obtained with the use of Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]