1. Effects of publication bias on conservation planning.
- Author
-
Hickisch R, Hodgetts T, Johnson PJ, Sillero-Zubiri C, Tockner K, and Macdonald DW
- Subjects
- Africa South of the Sahara, Biodiversity, Humans, Publication Bias, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecosystem
- Abstract
Conservation planners need reliable information on spatial patterns of biodiversity. However, existing data sets are skewed because some ecosystems, taxa, and locations are underrepresented. We determined how many articles have been published in recent decades on the biodiversity of different countries and their constituent provinces. We searched the Web of Science catalogues Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) for biodiversity-related articles published from 1993 to 2016 that included country and province names. We combined data on research publication frequency with other provincial-scale factors hypothesized to affect the likelihood of research activity (i.e., economic development, human presence, infrastructure, and remoteness). Areas that appeared understudied relative to the biodiversity expected based on site climate likely have been inaccessible to researchers for reasons, notably armed conflict. Geographic publication bias is of most concern in the most remote areas of sub-Saharan Africa and South America. Our provincial-scale model may help compensate for publication biases in conservation planning by revealing the spatial extent of research needs and the low cost of redoing this analysis annually., (© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF