Search

Purpose: The aim of the study was to identify solution strategies from a non-governmental (NGO) hospital in a war region for violence-related injuries and to show how high-income countries (HIC) might benefit from this expertise., Methods: NGO trauma hospital in Lashkar Gah, Afghanistan. Four hundred eighty-four war victims admitted in a three month period (February 2016-May 2016) were included. Patients´ characteristics were analyzed., Results: The mean age was 23.5 years. Four hundred thirty-four (89.9%) were male, and 50 (10.1%) were female. The most common cause of injury was bullet injuries, shell injuries, and mine injuries. The most common injured body region was the lower extremity, upper extremity, and the chest or the face. Apart from surgical wound care and debridements, which were performed on every wound in the operation theatre, laparotomy was the most common surgical procedure, followed by installation of a chest drainage and amputation., Conclusion: The surgical expertise and clear pathways outweigh modern infrastructure. In case of a mass casualty incident, fast decision-making with basic diagnostic means in order to take rapid measurements for life-saving therapies could make the difference.

Severe open foot and ankle injuries are still a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Their treatment is even more difficult in third world countries and in war settings where high-energy trauma with severe soft tissue damage is more frequent. Lack of equipment, poor resources and hygiene, and different cultural systems make most of the standard proposed treatments difficult to apply. The authors describe an inexpensive, rapid, minimally invasive, and easy-to-apply external fixation technique for the treatment of severe open ankle-foot fractures. With the main goal of soft tissue management rather than definitive treatment of any bony injuries, this technique was developed over time during many consecutive missions in Sierra Leone and Afghanistan as an alternative to more appropriate treatments with surprisingly satisfactory short- and long-term results.

Over a period of 14 months between 1990 and 1992, 73 Afghan war wounded with penetrating colon injuries were admitted and treated by a single surgical team in a field hospital of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). There were 67 males and 6 females, with a mean age of 23 years (range 6 to 80 years). Fifty six (77%) patients had multiple associated injuries; admission was delayed longer than 12 hours in 39 (44%); hypotension or deep shock was present at admission in 34 (47%) and 12 (16%) respectively. At laparotomy faecal contamination was limited to one quadrant in 58 (79.5%) cases and major in 15 (20.5%). Fifty-two (71.2%) patients underwent resection and primary anastomosis and 21 (28.8%) primary repair. Exteriorisation or diverting colostomy were never used. Four (5.5%) patients died and 11 (15%) had postoperative complications. Overall failure rate was 2.7%, including one faecal fistula conservatively treated and one colostomy raised as a precaution in a patient undergoing relaparotomy for intra-abdominal abscess. No primary repair leaked Deaths were significantly related to delay in admission and age, but not to surgical treatment. One stage primary treatment of large bowel injuries from penetrating abdominal wounds has low mortality, failure and colostomy rates suggesting its wider use regardless of risk factors.