Search

Patients missing portions or all of the maxillary alveolar bone who are restored with zygomatic implants frequently have threads exposed that can be a mucosal irritant. If such irritation is reported, covering the threads with a highly polished titanium sleeve is recommended. The technique of placing said custom sleeve is described. This adjunctive treatment method has eliminated mucosal irritation.

A gunshot injury is one of the main trauma injuries that affect the head and neck region. Severe esthetic, functional, and psychologic deficiencies are consequences of gunshot injuries. The use of implants anchored in the zygomatic bone has been advocated as an approach to the prosthetic rehabilitation of a severely deficient maxilla. This approach provides the patient with an immediate, high-quality, esthetic, and functional complete fixed prosthesis and eliminates the need for bone grafting. In this case report, a patient with a severely deficient maxilla caused by a gunshot injury was rehabilitated by placement of four zygomatic and two pterygomaxillary implants, which were immediately loaded with a complete fixed all-acrylic resin interim prosthesis. The definitive CM Prosthesis (CM Prosthetics) was constructed using computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) technology.

Purpose: Specifically with zygomatic implants, the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at the zygomatic bone correlates with the survival of the implant because there is little anchorage at the alveolus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to view and measure the BIC of zygomatic implants in the zygomatic bone., Materials and Methods: The patients in this study received zygomatic implants at a single private dental implant center. All patients were treated with the same immediate-loading protocol followed by postoperative cone beam computed tomography. The scans were exported to a computer-aided design system, where the BICs could be measured digitally. The BIC was analyzed by gender, and any statistical difference was determined by analysis of variance., Results: The study sample was composed of 77 patients (62.3% women) receiving 173 zygomatic implants. The mean age of the sample was 59 ± 8.7 years. The mean BIC was 15.3 ± 5.6 mm (range, 4.9 to 32.9 mm) in the zygomatic bone. On average, 35.9% ± 11.7% (range, 12.2% to 67.3%) of the implant came into contact with the zygomatic bone. The average BIC in men was 16.5 ± 6.0 mm, and the average BIC in women was 14.7 ± 5.4 mm, a statistically significant difference by analysis of variance (P < .05)., Conclusions: Evidence from this report indicates the zygomatic BIC varies greatly from patient to patient. These data show that the typical male patient has a greater zygomatic BIC than the typical female patient; however, these data do not support the hypothesis that the zygomatic BIC influences the zygomatic implant survival rate., (Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This clinical study using a specific technique was carried out to determine the clinical effectiveness of zygomatic implants under an immediate loading protocol., Materials and Methods: All patients treated between May 2000 and October 2006 who received zygomatic implants were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients were treated using the same surgical and restorative protocol. The following data were recorded: gender, age, type of implant, number of implants placed, dimensions of implants, and implant and prosthesis survival., Results: Fifty-six consecutive patients (29 women, 27 men; mean age of 60.58 years [range, 38.78 to 84.01]) were treated. All were in need of oral reconstruction and had maxillary atrophy that warranted zygomatic implant placement. One hundred ten zygomatic implants were placed in these 56 patients. Four of the 110 zygomatic implants failed, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 96.37% with follow-up data no less than 9 months and in excess of 5 years. All four failures were turned-surface zygomatic implants. There have been no failures to date with the titanium anodized-surface zygomatic implants. The prosthesis survival rate was 100.0%., Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis of 56 patients receiving 110 zygomatic implants, the survival rate of zygomatic implants was in excess of 96% over a period of 9 months to 5 years. This technique resulted in a stable and predictable prosthetic reconstruction.