Search

Traditional monitoring (e.g., in-water based surveys) of eelgrass meadows and perennial macroalgae in coastal areas is time and labor intensive, requires extensive equipment, and the collected data has a low temporal resolution. Further, divers and Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) have a low spatial extent that cover small fractions of full systems. The inherent heterogeneity of eelgrass meadows and macroalgae assemblages in these coastal systems makes interpolation and extrapolation of observations complicated and, as such, methods to collect data on larger spatial scales whilst retaining high spatial resolution is required to guide management. Recently, the utilization of Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has gained popularity in ecological sciences due to their ability to rapidly collect large amounts of area-based and georeferenced data, making it possible to monitor the spatial extent and status of SAV communities with limited equipment requirements compared to ROVs or diver surveys. This paper is focused on the increased value provided by UAV-based, data collection (visual/Red Green Blue imagery) and Object Based Image Analysis for gaining an improved understanding of eelgrass recovery. It is demonstrated that delineation and classification of two species of SAV (Fucus vesiculosus and Zostera marina) is possible; with an error matrix indicating 86–92% accuracy. Classified maps also highlighted the increasing biomass and areal coverage of F. vesiculosus as a potential stressor to eelgrass meadows. Further, authors derive a statistically significant conversion of percentage cover to biomass (R 2 = 0.96 for Fucus vesiculosus, R 2 = 0.89 for Zostera marina total biomass, and R 2 = 0.94 for AGB alone, p < 0.001). Results here provide an example of mapping cover and biomass of SAV and provide a tool to undertake spatio-temporal analyses to enhance the understanding of eelgrass ecosystem dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decades of eutrophication have increased water turbidity in Danish estuaries and led to light limitation of eelgrass (Zostera marina) growth. Former eelgrass areas are now denuded and consist of organic-rich muddy sediment with frequent resuspension events that maintain a high turbidity state. In addition, low anchoring capacity of eelgrass in the soft organic-rich sediments has contributed to eelgrass loss. When navigation channels in Danish estuaries are dredged, large amounts (~100.000 m3) of sandy sediment are shipped to remote dumping sites. Instead, we suggest that the dredged sand is used to consolidate adjacent muddy areas. We demonstrate in the present laboratory study that capping of fluid muddy sediment with 10 cm of sand is feasible without any vertical mixing and that this marine restoration approach potentially can lower the magnitude and frequency of resuspension events. Erosion of suspended solids change from 5 g m−2 min−1 above muddy sediment as to about 0.2 g m−2 min−1 after sand-capping, implying that the application of sand can improve light conditions. Moreover, since erosion thresholds increase from about 10–12 cm s−1 for mud to 40 cm s−1 for sand-capped mud the anchoring capacity of rooted vegetation is increased. However, the full potential of sand-capping to facilitate restoration of otherwise lost eelgrass habitats requires verification by large-scale field experiments. • The past 40 years of eutrophication have enriched estuarine sediments considerably in organic matter. • Sediments are no longer able to consolidate and resuspension has increased, keeping the water in a more turbid state. • Sand-capping muddy sediments significantly increased the thresholds for sediment erosion. • Sand-capping clearly consolidates muddy sediments, and the average benthic light intensity increases due to less resuspension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Seagrass global distribution has declined in the last decades due to many causes, and the implementation of recovery programmes as well as the development of new restoration techniques are needed. This work describes the development of an innovative restoration measure to enhance Zostera marina (eelgrass) seed germination and seedling survival in sediments inhabited by lugworms ( Arenicola marina ) and its validation in mesocosm experiments. The technique consists of placing 3 cm thick biodegradable coconut fibre mats (membrane) in the surface sediment to exclude the negative effects of sediment reworking (burial of seeds and destabilization/burial of seedlings). Two different flume mesocosm experiments were setup to test for: i) the effect of membranes on burial of Z. marina seeds; ii) the effect of membranes on survival and growth of Z. marina seedlings. The experiments were run for 8 and 10 weeks, respectively. Results show that the membrane was effectively preventing critical burial of Z. marina seeds as all seed mimics placed on the surface initially were recovered from 0 to 4 cm depth in the plots with membrane, while in the absence of the membrane, all seeds were buried to below the critical depth of 5–6 cm. The membrane also significantly enhanced the survival of Z. marina seedlings. The initial seedling density was in both cases 30/m 2 and the final density was 26.0 ± 3.3/m 2 with membrane versus 8.0 ± 1.6/m 2 without membrane. This new marine restoration measure showed to be effective on the reduction of the physical stress imposed by sediment reworking lugworms on Z. marina recovery, as a membrane keeps seeds at optimal depth for germination and protects seedlings from burial and erosion. In comparison to other measures, this new restoration technique is a low-tech nature-based solution. The results clearly show that this restoration technique can support Z. marina recovery through seeds and seedling protection. In this way, this technique contributes to decrease Z. marina vulnerability and increase its natural recovery potential and stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Eelgrass (Zostera marina) used to dominate the vegetation in Odense Fjord, Denmark, and covered >17km2 of the shallow fjord in 1983. Decades of excessive nutrient loading has lead to decreased eelgrass distribution, and only ~2km2 is covered at present. The state of low eelgrass coverage has not changed despite significant improvements of water quality in the past >10years, and lugworms, Arenicola marina, have colonized the former eelgrass areas (1–8ind.m−2). It was hypothesized that the lack of eelgrass recovery was due to A. marina, which was investigated by a combined field and laboratory approach. At a study site where eelgrass used to dominate, a seasonal study of lugworm population dynamics and sediment reworking activity was performed. Additionally, density dependent burial of eelgrass seeds and seedlings due to sediment reworking by A. marina was investigated in mesocosm experiments. Our results indicate that A. marina may negatively impact eelgrass recovery, since sediment reworking lead to rapid burial of eelgrass seeds and seedlings; within 1–2months, 95% of seeds and 75% of seedlings were buried below critical depth. Considerations based on empirical modeling suggest that negative impact occur even at low A. marina density (5–10ind.m−2). Therefore the spread of A. marina into former eelgrass areas is critical, since eelgrass recovery may be severely impaired, even when water quality favors eelgrass recolonization. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]