Search

Introduction: Trauma patients treated by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) can be transported to the hospital either by helicopter or by ambulance, in both cases accompanied by the HEMS physician. The objectives of this study are first to compile an overview of patients treated and transported by the HEMS team with either the helicopter (patients transported by helicopter, PTH) or with the ambulance (patients transported by ambulance, PTA). In addition, to evaluate whether the existing information systems obtain relevant data for researching the decision-making process. The second objective is to identify potentially influencing factors that could be significant for further research., Methods: All patients in the period from 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2020, treated by HEMS and subsequently transported to hospitals were included in the study. To avoid overrepresentation of the PTA group, a random sample was taken, creating two groups in a 1:2 ratio (PTH n = 724, PTA n = 1448). Differences in patient and treatment characteristics between PTH and PTA were compared using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests., Results: PTH accounted for 12.2% of all transports. Approximately two-third of the patients were male and the mean age was around 40 years. PTH had lower iEMV (initial Eye opening, best Motor response, best Verbal response) and iRTS (initial Revised Trauma Score) scores, were more frequently transported to a level 1 trauma centre, underwent more prehospital treatments and were roughly twice as far from their hospital of arrival compared to PTA., Conclusion: The current dataset is, after some modifications, suitable to provide a comprehensive overview of patients treated by HEMS in the Netherlands. A predictive model could be developed using this dataset, which should include factors such as the patient's location, age, distance to the hospital, physician on duty, mechanism of injury and overall injury severity., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Unintentional injury remains the leading cause of death for adults worldwide. We aimed to investigate the rates and distribution of dead on arrival (DOA) patients according to emergency medical services (EMS) mode of transport (MoT), EMS transport time (TT), injury severity score (ISS), and type of injury., Methods: This retrospective study utilized de-identified incident-based data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File (ACS-TQIP PUF) dataset (2013-2018) to study Adult DOA patients. DOA was defined according to the data point, "arrived with no signs of life and did not recover". Patients with unknown vitals and patients with no EMS vitals at the scene (HR = 0, RR = 0, and SBP = 0) were excluded to identify DOAs who died during transport. The DOAs included for analysis were sorted into three groups based on injury severity score [low (ISS < 15), intermediate (ISS = 15-24), and severe (ISS ≥ 25)] and subdivided according to injury type (blunt vs. penetrating), EMS Mode of transport and transport times. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05., Results: The majority of the evaluated 6030 adult DOA patients were male (73.3%) and 18-64 years of age (79.6%). Most patients sustained blunt injuries (58.2%), and the most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). Patients who traveled by helicopter EMS (HEMS) experienced less deaths than those traveling by ground EMS (GEMS) despite transporting more severely injured patients over longer time intervals. Median HEMS TTs were greater than their GEMS counterparts for blunt and penetrating injuries across all ISS groups but were associated with fewer deaths., Conclusion: Helicopter emergency medical service use with intermediate and severely injured patients with penetrating injuries is associated with a reduced number of DOAs. Future studies should prospectively investigate EMS performance to confirm the findings identified in this retrospective analysis. Additionally, other factors affecting pre-hospital EMS performance (e.g., geographic variations, weather-related characteristics, in-flight interventions/procedures) should be investigated. Finally, the results of this study highlight the need for standardized HEMS utilization triage criteria., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors disclose no competing interest., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Significant disparities in access to prompt helicopter transport exist among rural trauma populations. We evaluated the impact of an additional helicopter base on transport time and mortality in a rural adult trauma population., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with trauma transported by helicopter from scene to a level one trauma center between 2014 and 2018. A new rural helicopter base added to the trauma center's catchment area in 2016 served as the transition time for an interrupted time series analysis. Patients injured in this base's county and adjoining counties were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were compared with a Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test. Cox and linear regression models evaluated the new base's effect on mortality and transport time, respectively., Results: A total of 332 patients were analyzed: 120 (36.1%) transported before the addition of the new helicopter base and 212 (63.9%) transported after. Patients transported after the addition of the base had higher injury severity score (13.7 versus 10.1, P < 0.001) and were more likely to receive blood en route (19.3% versus 6.7%, P = 0.005). After the addition of the base, there was a decreased hazard ratio for mortality (hazard ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.65, P = 0.004) with no significant change in transport time (-36.7 min, P = 0.071) for the area., Conclusions: Local helicopter transport units may confer improved survival for the injured patient. This study demonstrates the important role of helicopter transport within a regional trauma system and the impact that expanded access to rapid air transport can have on mortality., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: When to transport pediatric trauma patients directly from scene to a trauma center via helicopter (HT) has been a long debated topic. This study proposes Need for Surgeon Presence (NSP) matrix as an alternative method to assess appropriate utilization of HT of pediatric trauma patients directly from the scene of injury., Method: We utilized the 2016 TQIP database. NSP was defined as having one or more of the following: intubation, transfusion, operation for hemorrhage control/craniotomy, vasopressors, interventional radiology, spinal cord injury, tube thoracostomy, emergency thoracotomy, intracranial pressure monitor, or pericardiocentesis. The outcome of interest was the presence or absence of a NSP indicator., Results: The NSP + patients had a: longer LOS, GCS<14, positive SIPA index value, went to OR/ICU from the ED, and had penetrating injury. Among patient with an ISS≥16, mortality for those also NSP+ was 18.8% versus 1.4% among the NSP-., Conclusion: The disparity between NSP and traditional ISS thresholds supports NSP as an additional metric to validate pre-hospital triage criteria and may be a better indicator of overall hospital resource utilization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The increasing sophistication of pre-hospital care, with paramedics and many types of 'rapid response' units, requires the use of advanced systems of ambulance control. The introduction of call selection by a paramedic in the ambulance control room significantly improved the tasking of the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. This paper illustrates the need for a system to grade 999 calls, so that the appropriate pre-hospital response can be directed to each patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]