Search

Introduction: Hawthorne effect refers to changes in clinician behavior in response to being observed. It has been minimally evaluated in trauma and surgical research, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)., Methods: We used data from the first (control) phase of a randomized clinical trial in Ghana (2020-21). Trained observers were stationed in emergency units in eight non-tertiary hospitals to observe the achievement of key performance indicators (KPI) (KPIs) of trauma care. We hypothesized that the observers' presence would create a Hawthorne effect, resulting in clinicians (doctors, nurses) performing above their usual level, with performance highest immediately after the observers were introduced, and with performance then declining over time toward the usual baseline., Results: We enrolled 2067 injured patients. Achievement of 13 out of 16 KPIs declined significantly over the 14 months after the introduction of observers. For example, airway assessment declined from 77% initially to 60% at the end of the phase (p < 0.001). Chest examination declined from 66% to 31% (p < 0.001). Distal pulses checked declined from 45% to 7% (p < 0.001). The slope of decline in KPI achievement ranged from 0.8%/month (mobility assessed) to 15.9%/month (distal pulses checked)., Conclusions: The decline in KPI achievement over time is consistent with the hypothesis that clinicians performed above their usual level just after the observers were introduced, with performance then declining toward the usual baseline. This study is among the first to provide quantitative data on the Hawthorne effect for trauma research in LMICs. These data are useful for the design of future observational studies and clinical trials., (© 2024 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).)

Background: Orthopaedic conditions incur more than 52 million disability-adjusted life years annually worldwide. This burden disproportionately affects low and middle-income countries, which are least equipped to provide orthopaedic care. We aimed to assess orthopaedic capacity in Ghana, describe spatial access to orthopaedic care, and identify hospitals that would most improve access to care if their capacity was improved., Methods: Seventeen perioperative and orthopaedic trauma care-related items were selected from the World Health Organization's Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care. Direct inspection and structured interviews with hospital staff were used to assess resource availability and factors contributing to deficiencies at 40 purposively sampled facilities. Cost-distance analyses described population-level spatial access to orthopaedic trauma care. Facilities for targeted capability improvement were identified through location-allocation modeling., Results: Orthopaedic trauma care assessment demonstrated marked deficiencies. Some deficient resources were low cost (e.g., spinal immobilization, closed reduction capabilities, and prosthetics for amputees). Resource nonavailability resulted from several contributing factors (e.g., absence of equipment, technology breakage, lack of training). Implants were commonly prohibitively expensive. Building basic orthopaedic care capacity at 15 hospitals without such capacity would improve spatial access to basic care from 74.9% to 83.0% of the population (uncertainty interval [UI] of 81.2% to 83.6%), providing access for an additional 2,169,714 Ghanaians., Conclusions: The availability of several low-cost resources could be better supplied by improvements in organization and training for orthopaedic trauma care. There is a critical need to advocate and provide funding for orthopaedic resources. These initiatives might be particularly effective if aimed at hospitals that could provide care to a large proportion of the population.

Introduction: Prospective clinical audit of trauma care improves outcomes for the injured in high-income countries (HICs). However, equivalent, context-appropriate audit filters for use in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) district-level hospitals have not been well established. We aimed to develop context-appropriate trauma care audit filters for district-level hospitals in Ghana, was well as other LMICs more broadly., Methods: Consensus on trauma care audit filters was built between twenty panellists using a Delphi technique with four anonymous, iterative surveys designed to elicit: (i) trauma care processes to be measured; (ii) important features of audit filters for the district-level hospital setting; and (iii) potentially useful filters. Filters were ranked on a scale from 0 to 10 (10 being very useful). Consensus was measured with average percent majority opinion (APMO) cut-off rate. Target consensus was defined a priori as: a median rank of ≥9 for each filter and an APMO cut-off rate of ≥0.8., Results: Panellists agreed on trauma care processes to target (e.g. triage, phases of trauma assessment, early referral if needed) and specific features of filters for district-level hospital use (e.g. simplicity, unassuming of resource capacity). APMO cut-off rate increased successively: Round 1--0.58; Round 2--0.66; Round 3--0.76; and Round 4--0.82. After Round 4, target consensus on 22 trauma care and referral-specific filters was reached. Example filters include: triage--vital signs are recorded within 15 min of arrival (must include breathing assessment, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation if available); circulation--a large bore IV was placed within 15 min of patient arrival; referral--if referral is activated, the referring clinician and receiving facility communicate by phone or radio prior to transfer., Conclusion: This study proposes trauma care audit filters appropriate for LMIC district-level hospitals. Given the successes of similar filters in HICs and obstetric care filters in LMICs, the collection and reporting of prospective trauma care audit filters may be an important step towards improving care for the injured at district-level hospitals in LMICs., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)