Search

Background: Massive transfusion (MT) is a lifesaving treatment for trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock, assessed by Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) Score based on mechanism of injury, systolic blood pressure (SBP), tachycardia, and FAST exam. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of ABC score by replacing hypotension and tachycardia; with Shock Index (SI) > 1.0 and including pelvic fractures.Methods: We performed a 2-year (2014-2015) analysis of all high-level trauma activations and excluded patients dead on arrival. The ABC score was calculated using the 4-point score [blunt (0)/penetrating trauma (1), HR ≥ 120 (1), SBP ≤ 90 mmHg (1), and FAST positive (1)]. The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) score also included 4 points, calculated by replacing HR and SBP with SI > 1.0 and including pelvic fracture. AUROC compared performances of the two scores.Results: A total of 380 patients were included. The overall MT was 27%. Patients receiving MT had higher median ABC scores [1.1 (0-2) vs. 1 (0-2), p = 0.15] and RABT scores [2 (1-3) vs. 1 (0-2), p < 0.001]. The RABT score had better discriminative power (AUROC = 0.828) compared to ABC score (AUROC = 0.617) for predicting the need for MT. Cutoff of RABT score ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 77% for predicting need for MT compared to ABC score with 39% sensitivity and 72% specificity.Conclusion: Replacement of hypotension and tachycardia with a SI > 1.0 and inclusion of pelvic fracture enhanced discrimination of ABC score for predicting the need for MT. The current ABC score would benefit from revision to more appropriately identify patients requiring MT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives The P.A.L.Li.A.T.E. (prognostic assessment of life and limitations after trauma in the elderly) consortium has previously created a prognosis calculator for mortality after geriatric injury based on age, injury severity, and transfusion requirement called the geriatric trauma outcome score ( GTOS). Here, we sought to create and validate a prognosis calculator called the geriatric trauma outcome score ii ( GTOS II) estimating probability of unfavorable discharge. Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Four geographically diverse Level 1 trauma centers. Participants Trauma admissions aged 65 to 102 years surviving to discharge from 2000 to 2013. Intervention None. Measurements Age, injury severity score ( ISS), transfusion at 24 hours post-admission, discharge dichotomized as favorable (home/rehabilitation) or unfavorable (skilled nursing/long term acute care/hospice). Training and testing samples were created using the holdout method. A multiple logistic mixed model ( GTOS II) was created to estimate the odds of unfavorable disposition then re-specified using the GTOS II as the sole predictor in a logistic mixed model using the testing sample. Results The final dataset was 16,114 subjects (unfavorable discharge status = 15.4%). Training (n = 8,057) and testing (n = 8,057) samples had similar demographics. The formula based on the training sample was ( GTOS II = Age + [0.71 × ISS] + 8.79 [if transfused by 24 hours]). Misclassification rate and AUC were 15.63% and 0.67 for the training sample, respectively, and 15.85% and 0.67 for the testing sample. Conclusion GTOS II estimates the probability of unfavorable discharge in injured elders with moderate accuracy. With the GTOS mortality calculator, it can help in goal setting conversations after geriatric injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite increasing evidence that assessing frailty facilitates medical decision-making, a quick and clinically simple frailty assessment tool is not available for trauma settings.Study Design: This study examined accuracy and acceptability of a novel wearable technology (upper-extremity frailty [UEF]) to objectively assess frailty status in older adults (65 years or older) admitted to the hospital due to traumatic ground-level falls. Frailty was measured using a validated modified Rockwood questionnaire, the Trauma-Specific Frailty Index (TSFI), as the gold standard. Participants performed a 20-second trial of rapid elbow flexion with the dominant elbow in a supine posture while wearing the UEF system.Results: We recruited 101 eligible older adults (age 79 ± 9 years). Parameters of the UEF indicative of slowness, weakness, and exhaustion during elbow flexion were independent predictors of the TSFI score, while adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. A high agreement (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) was observed between TSFI score and the UEF model; sensitivity and specificity for predicting the frailty status were 78% and 82%, respectively. Of recruited participants, 57% were not able to walk at the time of measurements, suggesting a limitation for walking-based frailty assessments. Significant correlations were observed between UEF parameters and number of falls within a previous year, with highest correlation observed for elbow flexion slowness (r = -0.41).Conclusions: The results suggest that a simple test of 20-second elbow flexion may be practical and sensitive to identify frailty among hospitalized older adults. The UEF test is independent of walking assessments, reflects several frailty markers, and it is practical for bed-bound patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) is not optimal but still remains a valuable source of organ donation in trauma donors. The aim of this study was to assess national trends in DCD from trauma patients. Methods A 12-year (2002 to 2013) retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database was performed. Outcome measures were the following: proportion of DCD donors over the years and number and type of solid organs donated. Results DCD resulted in procurement of 16,248 solid organs from 8,724 donors. The number of organs donated per donor remained unchanged over the study period (P = .1). DCD increased significantly from 3.1% in 2002 to 14.6% in 2013 (P = .001). There was a significant increase in the proportion of kidney (2002: 3.4% vs 2013: 16.3%, P = .001) and liver (2002: 1.6% vs 2013: 5%, P = .041) donation among DCD donors over the study period. Conclusions DCD from trauma donors provides a significant source of solid organs. The proportion of DCD donors increased significantly over the last 12 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Use of 5% normal saline (NS) is gaining renewed interest. The primary aim of our study was to compare the physiological effects after the administration of different concentrations of hypertonic saline (3% vs 5%NS) in the initial resuscitation of trauma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all trauma patients who received hypertonic saline during initial resuscitation. Medical records were reviewed for serum electrolytes and serum osmolarity, coagulation parameters, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were included in the study, of which 170 patients received 5%NS and 42 patients received 3%NS. Both groups were similar in age (41.16 ± 19 vs 44.17 1 23.6; P = .45) and ISS score (26 [17 to 29] vs 25 [16 to 27]; P = .6). Mean serum osmolarity (316 ± 20.3 vs 294 ± 22.5; P = .02) and serum sodium levels (143 ± 8.6 vs 137 ± 10.9; P < .001) remained higher in the 5%NS group within 72 hours of admission. The pH was lower in the 5%NS group compared with the 3%NS group at 24 hours (7.29 ± .12 vs 7.33 ± .12; P = .01); however, at 48 and 72 hours (7.40 ± .07 vs 7.41 ± .07; P = .7), no difference was found. There was no difference in blood products requirement (1,734 vs 2,253 mL; P = .11) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 5%NS has sustained higher serum osmolarity and serum sodium concentration within the first 72 hours without any increase in adverse effects in comparison with 3%NS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The development of coagulopathy of trauma is multifactorial associated with hypoperfusion and consumption of coagulation factors. Previous studies have compared the role of factor replacement versus FPP for reversal of trauma coagulopathy. The purpose of our study was to determine the time to correction of coagulopathy and blood product requirement in patients who received PCC+FFP compared with patients who received FFP alone. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all coagulopathic (INR ≥ 1.5) trauma patients presenting to our level I trauma center during a 2-years period (2011-2012). Patients were stratified into two groups: patients who received PCC+FFP and patients who received FFP alone. Patients in the two groups were matched in a 1:3 (PCC+FFP:FFP) ratio using propensity score matching for demographics, injury severity, vital parameters, and initial INR. The two groups were then compared for: correction of INR, time to correction of INR, thromboembolic complications, mortality, and cost of therapy. Results: A total of 252 were included in the analysis [PCC+FFP:63; FFP:189]. The mean age was 44 ± 20 years; 70 % were male, with a median ISS score of 27 [16-38]. PCC use was associated with an accelerated correction of INR (394 vs. 1,050 min; p 0.001), reduction in requirement of pack red blood cell (6.6 vs. 10 units; p 0.001) and FFP (2.8 vs. 3.9 units; p 0.01), and decline in mortality (23 vs. 28 %; p 0.04). PCC+FFP use was associated with a higher cost of therapy ($1,470 ± 845 vs. 1,171 ± 949; p 0.01) but lower overall cost of transfusion ($7,110 ± 1,068 vs. 9,571 ± 1,524; p 0.01) compared with FFP therapy alone. Conclusions: PCC in conjunction with FFP rapidly corrects INR in a matched cohort of trauma patients not on warfarin therapy compared with FFP therapy alone. The use of PCC as an adjunct to FFP therapy is associated with reduction of blood product requirement and also lowers overall cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Smartphones can be used to record and transmit high-quality clinical photographs. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with smartphone telephotography in the care of trauma patients. We hypothesized that smartphone telephotography can be safely and effectively implemented on a trauma service. Subjects and Methods: We performed a 2-year (January 2011-December 2012) prospective analysis of all patient photographs recorded by members of our trauma team at our Level I trauma center. All members of the trauma team recorded patient photographs and e-mailed them to a secure e-mail account. An administrative assistant uploaded a copy of each photgrapho into the patient's electronic medical record. We assessed the number of photographs collected and uploaded, as well as the success, failure, and complication rates. Results: Our trauma team sent 7,200 photographs to a secure e-mail account. Of those, 6,120 (85%) were considered, after an initial review, to be of good quality. Of these, 3,320 photographs (54%) were successfully uploaded into a patient's electronic medical record; the remaining 2,800 photographs lacked adequate labeling and could not be uploaded. The average interval to uploading was 3 months. In total, 10 photographs were uploaded into the wrong patient's electronic medical record, for an error rate of 0.003%. We received only three complaints during the study period. Conclusions: Telephotography can be safely and effectively implemented in trauma clinical practice. Fears of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act violations are not valid, as the incidence of patient complaints is minimal when telephotography is implemented under strict guidelines and rules. Dedicated administrative personnel are essential for effective implementation of smartphone photography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Variability exits in the ability to predict overall recovery after trauma and inpatient rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to identify factors predicting functional improvement in trauma patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Methods: We performed a 3-y retrospective cohort analysis on a prospectively collected database of all trauma patients discharged from a level I trauma center to a single inpatient rehabilitation center. Patient's Functional Independence Measures (FIM) scores on hospital discharge and on discharge from the rehabilitation center were collected. Delta FIM was defined as the difference in FIM between rehabilitation center discharge and hospital discharge. Multiple linear regressions were performed to identify hospital admission factors associated with delta FIM. Results: We included 160 patients, 69% were male, mean age 54.6 ± 22 y, and median Injury Severity Score 14 [10–50]. Based on rehabilitation admission FIM scores, 29 were totally dependent and 131 were partially dependent. The mean change in FIM was 39.4 ± 13. Age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale on presentation, Injury Severity Score, systolic blood pressure on presentation, and intensive care unit length of stay were not predictive of delta FIM. Hospital length of stay and head Abbreviated Injury Score on hospital admission were negative predictors of delta FIM. Conclusions: In our study, age as an independent factor was not predictive of functional outcome after injury. The extent of head injury continues to negatively affect the overall functional improvement based on FIM. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: The gap between demand of transplantable organs and their supply continues to widen. Trauma patients constitute a significant proportion of organ donors. The incidence of organ donation after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest (TCPA), however, is not clear. The goals of this study were to determine the success rate of organ donation in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after trauma and to determine if there are variables that may predict successful organ donation. Methods: All trauma patients who sustained TCPA from April 2007 to March 2010 were reviewed. We identified all patients who required CPR in the field or the trauma center. Patients were classified as donors if the heart, lung, kidney, small bowel, pancreas, or liver was harvested. Primary outcome was organ donation after CPR. Results: A total of 252 patients required CPR for TCPA in the field or in the trauma center. There were 39 (15.5%) survivors and 213 (84.5%) fatalities. Only 19 of 213 (8.9%) patients who died after TCPA became organ donors. A total of 26 organs were harvested including 15 kidneys, 6 livers, 4 hearts, and 1 pancreas. Of those who failed to donate organs, 64.7% had a cardiac arrest after the donor network had been contacted but before their arrival. Conclusions: Survival rate after TCPA is low but organ donation is an important secondary outcome. Patients with predominant head injuries, without thoracic and minimal extremity injuries, should be identified as having a higher chance of going on to organ donation. The greatest barrier to organ donation in TCPA patients is cardiac arrest before donor network arrival. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) is becoming the preferred product for the resuscitation of hemorrhaging trauma patients. However, there is a lack of data on the optimum timing of receiving WB. We aimed to assess the effect of time to WB transfusion on the outcomes of trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons TQIP 2017 to 2019 database was analyzed. Adult trauma patients who received at least 1 unit of WB within the first 2 hours of admission were included. Patients were stratified by time to first unit of WB transfusion (first 30 minutes, second 30 minutes, and second hour). Primary outcomes were 24-hour and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1,952 patients were identified. Mean age and systolic blood pressure were 42±18 years and 101 ±35 mmHg, respectively. Median Injury Severity Score was 17 [10 to 26], and all groups had comparable injury severities (p = 0.27). Overall, 24-hour and in-hospital mortality rates were 14% and 19%, respectively. Transfusion of WB after 30 minutes was progressively associated with increased adjusted odds of 24-hour mortality (second 30 minutes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.07, p = 0.015; second hour: aOR 2.39, p = 0.010) and in-hospital mortality (second 30 minutes: aOR 1.79, p = 0.025; second hour: aOR 1.98, p = 0.018). On subanalysis of patients with an admission shock index >1, every 30-minute delay in WB transfusion was associated with higher odds of 24-hour (aOR 1.23, p = 0.019) and in-hospital (aOR 1.18, p = 0.033) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Every minute delay in WB transfusion is associated with a 2% increase in odds of 24-hour and in-hospital mortality among hemorrhaging trauma patients. WB should be readily available and easily accessible in the trauma bay for the early resuscitation of hemorrhaging patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Common and external iliac artery injuries (IAI) portend significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of mechanism of injury and type of repair on outcomes and identify the optimal repair for patients with traumatic IAI using a large, national dataset. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing operative repair for IAI were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database during a 5-year timespan, ending in 2019. Age, sex, race, severity of injury, severity of shock, type of iliac repair (open or endovascular), mechanism, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Patients with IAI were stratified by both type of repair and mechanism and compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Operative IAI was identified in 507 patients. Of these injuries, 309 (61%) were penetrating and 346 (68.2%) involved the external iliac artery. The majority of patients were male (82%) with a median age and ISS of 31 and 20, respectively. Endovascular repair was performed in 31% of cases. For patients with penetrating injuries, the type of repair impacted neither morbidity nor mortality. For blunt-injured patients, endovascular repair was associated with lower morbidity (29.3% vs 41.3%; p = 0.082) and significantly reduced mortality (14.6% vs 26.7%; p = 0.037) compared with the open-repair approach. Multivariable logistic regression identified endovascular repair as the only modifiable risk factor associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio 0.34; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.79; p = 0.0116). CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic IAI causes significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair was identified as the only modifiable predictor of decreased mortality in blunt-injured patients with traumatic IAI. Therefore, for select patients with blunt IAIs, an endovascular repair should be the preferred approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Iatrogenic bile duct injury is a serious complication of cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to assess predictors of bile duct injury using a national database. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2010-2012) was queried for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We used a) diagnoses for bile duct injury and b) bile duct injury repair procedure codes as a surrogate marker for bile duct injuries. Results: A total of 1,015 patients had bile duct injury. The mean age was 58.2 ± 19.7 years, 53.5 % were males, and median Charlson co-morbidity score was 2 [, ]. Multivariate analysis revealed morbid obesity [2.8 (2.1-4.3); p = 0.03] and age >65 [1.5 (1.05-2.1); p = 0.01] as the independent predictors for bile duct injury in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Conclusion: Our study finds a new association between obesity, aging, and bile duct injuries which has never been reported in literature before. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Firearm-related injuries (FRI) are an important public health crisis in the US. There is relatively less city level data examining the injury-related trends in Tucson, Arizona. Our study aims to examine FRI, in Southern Arizona's only Level I trauma center. We conducted a (2014-2019) review of our Level-I trauma center registry. We selected all patients who were evaluated for a FRI. We collected patient and center related variables. Our outcomes were the trends of FRI, injury-related characteristics, and mortality. Cochran–Armitage trend analysis was performed. A total of 1012 FRI patients were identified. The majority of patients were teenagers (32%) and young adults (30%), and 88% were male. Greater than 80% of patients belonged to the low/low-middle socioeconomic class, and 18.5% completed college. The most common firearm utilized was the handgun (45%). The prevalence of FRI increased significantly (2014:15%; 2019:21%; P < 0.01). The most common injury intention was assault (75%). The median ISS was 17(9-25) with most injuries sustained to the extremities (23%). Also, 25% required emergent operative intervention. There is a significant rise in the number of severely injured patients (ISS≥25) (2014:12.1%, 2019:20%; P < 0.01), self-inflicted injuries (2014:10%, 2019:17%; P < 0.01), unintentional injuries (2014:6%, 2019:12%; P < 0.01), and mortality (2014:11%; 2019:19%; P < 0.01). A high prevalence of substance abuse was noted (73% alcohol, 64% drugs). The prevalence of FRI at our center has been rising over the past decade with a shift towards more severe injuries and higher mortality rates. Addressing these alarming changes requires targeted interventions on multiple frontiers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction to the article "Age and Obesity are Independent Predictors of Bile Duct Injuries in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy" by Hassan Aziz and colleagues is presented.

Rural trauma care has been regarded as being the 'challenge for the next decade.' Trauma patients in rural areas face more struggles than their urban counterparts because of the absence of specialized trauma care, delay in providing immediate care to trauma victims, and longer transport times to reach a trauma center. Telemedicine is a promising tool for facilitating rural trauma care. This stellar tool creates a real-time link between a remotely located specialist and the local healthcare provider, especially during the initial management of the trauma patient, involving resuscitation and even intubation. However, the high cost of purchasing, setting up, and maintaining all the needed equipment has made telemedicine an expensive proposition for rural hospitals, which frequently have limited budgets. But recently, new improvements in communication technology have made smartphones an indispensable part of daily life, even in rural areas. These devices have great potential to improve patient care and enhance medical education because of their wide adoption and ease of use. In this article, we describe our initial teletrauma experience and the effect of smartphone implementation in patient care and medical education at the University of Arizona Medical Center in Tucson. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]