Search

Running crop growth models (CGM) coupled with whole genome prediction (WGP) as a CGM–WGP model introduces environmental information to WGP and genomic relatedness information to the genotype-specific parameters modelled through CGMs. Previous studies have primarily used CGM–WGP to infer prediction accuracy without exploring its potential to enhance CGM and WGP. Here, we implemented a heading and maturity date wheat phenology model within a CGM–WGP framework and compared it with CGM and WGP. The CGM–WGP resulted in more heritable genotype-specific parameters with more biologically realistic correlation structures between genotype-specific parameters and phenology traits compared with CGM-modelled genotype-specific parameters that reflected the correlation of measured phenotypes. Another advantage of CGM–WGP is the ability to infer accurate prediction with much smaller and less diverse reference data compared with that required for CGM. A genome-wide association analysis linked the genotype-specific parameters from the CGM–WGP model to nine significant phenology loci including Vrn-A1 and the three PPD1 genes, which were not detected for CGM-modelled genotype-specific parameters. Selection on genotype-specific parameters could be simpler than on observed phenotypes. For example, thermal time traits are theoretically more independent candidates, compared with the highly correlated heading and maturity dates, which could be used to achieve an environment-specific optimal flowering period. CGM–WGP combines the advantages of CGM and WGP to predict more accurate phenotypes for new genotypes under alternative or future environmental conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Crop growth models (CGM) can predict the performance of a cultivar in untested environments by sampling genotype-specific parameters. As they cannot predict the performance of new cultivars, it has been proposed to integrate CGMs with whole genome prediction (WGP) to combine the benefits of both models. Here, we used a CGM–WGP model to predict the performance of new wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes. The CGM was designed to predict phenology, nitrogen, and biomass traits. The CGM–WGP model simulated more heritable GSPs compared with the CGM and gave smaller errors for the observed phenotypes. The WGP model performed better when predicting yield, grain number, and grain protein content, but showed comparable performance to the CGM–WGP model for heading and physiological maturity dates. However, the CGM–WGP model was able to predict unobserved traits (for which there were no phenotypic records in the reference population). The CGM–WGP model also showed superior performance when predicting unrelated individuals that clustered separately from the reference population. Our results demonstrate new advantages for CGM–WGP modelling and suggest future efforts should focus on calibrating CGM–WGP models using high-throughput phenotypic measures that are cheaper and less laborious to collect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Array-based single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping platforms have low genotype error and missing data rates compared to genotyping-by-sequencing technologies. However, design decisions used to create array-based SNP genotyping assays for both research and breeding applications are critical to their success. We describe a novel approach applicable to any animal or plant species for the design of cost-effective imputation-enabled SNP genotyping arrays with broad utility and demonstrate its application through the development of the Illumina Infinium Wheat Barley 40K SNP array Version 1.0. We show that the approach delivers high quality and high resolution data for wheat and barley, including when samples are jointly hybridised. The new array aims to maximally capture haplotypic diversity in globally diverse wheat and barley germplasm while minimizing ascertainment bias. Comprising mostly biallelic markers that were designed to be species-specific and single-copy, the array permits highly accurate imputation in diverse germplasm to improve the statistical power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and genomic selection. The SNP content captures tetraploid wheat (A- and B-genome) and Aegilops tauschii Coss. (D-genome) diversity and delineates synthetic and tetraploid wheat from other wheat, as well as tetraploid species and subgroups. The content includes SNP tagging key trait loci in wheat and barley, as well as direct connections to other genotyping platforms and legacy datasets. The utility of the array is enhanced through the web-based tool, Pretzel (https://plantinformatics.io/) which enables the content of the array to be visualized and interrogated interactively in the context of numerous genetic and genomic resources to be connected more seamlessly to research and breeding. The array is available for use by the international wheat and barley community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increasing the number of environments for phenotyping of crop lines in earlier stages of breeding programs can improve selection accuracy. However, this is often not feasible due to cost. In our study, we investigated a sparse phenotyping method that does not test all entries in all environments, but instead capitalizes on genomic prediction to predict missing phenotypes in additional environments without extra phenotyping expenditure. The breeders' main interest – response to selection – was directly simulated to evaluate the effectiveness of the sparse genomic phenotyping method in a wheat and a rice data set. Whether sparse phenotyping resulted in more selection response depended on the correlations of phenotypes between environments. The sparse phenotyping method consistently showed statistically significant higher responses to selection, compared to complete phenotyping, when the majority of completely phenotyped environments were negatively (wheat) or lowly positively (rice) correlated and any extension environment was highly positively correlated with any of the completely phenotyped environments. When all environments were positively correlated (wheat) or any highly positively correlated environments existed (wheat and rice), sparse phenotyping did not improved response. Our results indicate that genomics-based sparse phenotyping can improve selection response in the middle stages of crop breeding programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key message: Genomic selection enabled accurate prediction for the concentration of 13 nutritional element traits in wheat. Wheat biofortification is one of the most sustainable strategies to alleviate mineral deficiency in human diets. Here, we investigated the potential of genomic selection using BayesR and Bayesian ridge regression (BRR) models to predict grain yield (YLD) and the concentration of 13 nutritional elements in grains (B, Ca, Co, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P and Zn) using a population of 1470 spring wheat lines. The lines were grown in replicated field trials with two times of sowing (TOS) at 3 locations (Narrabri-NSW, all lines; Merredin-WA and Horsham-VIC, 200 core lines). Narrow-sense heritability across environments (locations/TOS) ranged from 0.09 to 0.45. Co, K, Na and Ca showed low to negative genetic correlations with other traits including YLD, while the remaining traits were negatively correlated with YLD. When all environments were included in the reference population, medium to high prediction accuracy was observed for the different traits across environments. BayesR had higher average prediction accuracy for mineral concentrations (r = 0.55) compared to BRR (r = 0.48) across all traits and environments but both methods had comparable accuracies for YLD. We also investigated the utility of one or two locations (reference locations) to predict the remaining location(s), as well as the ability of one TOS to predict the other. Under these scenarios, BayesR and BRR showed comparable performance but with lower prediction accuracy compared to the scenario of predicting reference environments for new lines. Our study demonstrates the potential of genomic selection for enriching wheat grain with nutritional elements in biofortification breeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Sequence elimination is one of the main mechanisms that increases the divergence among homoeologous chromosomes after allopolyploidization to enhance the stability of recently established lineages, but it can cause a loss of some economically important genes. Synthetic hexaploid wheat (SHW) is an important source of genetic variation to the natural hexaploid wheat (NHW) genepool that has low genetic diversity. Here, we investigated the change between SHW and NHW genomes by utilizing a large germplasm set of primary synthetics and synthetic derivatives. Reproducible segment elimination (RSE) was declared if a large chromosomal chunk (>5 cM) produced no aligned reads in more than five SHWs. RSE in five genomic regions was the major source of variation between SHW and NHW. One RSE eliminated almost the complete short arm of chromosome 1B, which contains major genes for flour quality, disease resistance and different enzymes. The occurrence of RSE was highly dependent on the choice of diploid and tetraploid parental lines, their ancestral subpopulation and admixture, e.g. SHWs derived from Triticum dicoccon or from one of two Aegilops tauschii subpopulations were almost free of RSE, while highly admixed parents had higher RSE rates. The rate of RSE in synthetic derivatives was almost double that in primary synthetics. Genome‐wide association analysis detected four loci with minor effects on the occurrence of RSE, indicating that both parental lines and genetic factors were affecting the occurrence of RSE. Therefore, pre‐pre‐breeding strategies should be applied before introducing SHW into pre‐breeding programs to ensure genomic stability and avoid undesirable gene loss. Significance Statement: This study documented the occurrence of multiple reproducible sequence eliminations in synthetic hexaploid wheat compared with natural hexaploid wheat; a phenomenon affected by the choice of parental lines, their admixture and genetic factors. These sequence eliminations caused significant gene loss and could affect the fertility of the progeny of natural/synthetic hexaploid hybrids, therefor it is important to avoid these in practical breeding programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key message: A multi-environment genomic prediction model incorporating environmental covariates increased the prediction accuracy of wheat grain protein content. The advantage of the haplotype-based model was dependent upon the trait of interest. The inclusion of environment covariates (EC) in genomic prediction models has the potential to precisely model environmental effects and genotype-by-environment interactions. Together with EC, a haplotype-based genomic prediction approach, which is capable of accommodating the interaction between local epistasis and environment, may increase the prediction accuracy. The main objectives of our study were to evaluate the potential of EC to portray the relationship between environments and the relevance of local epistasis modelled by haplotype-based approaches in multi-environment prediction. The results showed that among five traits: grain yield (GY), plant height, protein content, screenings percentage (SP) and thousand kernel weight, protein content exhibited a 2.1% increase in prediction accuracy when EC was used to model the environmental relationship compared to treatment of the environment as a regular random effect without a variance–covariance structure. The approach used a Gaussian kernel to characterise the relationship among environments that displayed no advantage in contrast to the use of a genomic relationship matrix. The prediction accuracies of haplotype-based approaches for SP were consistently higher than the genotype-based model when the numbers of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in a haplotype were from three to ten. In contrast, for GY, haplotype-based models outperformed genotype-based methods when two to four SNPs were used to construct the haplotype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Australia has one of the oldest modern wheat breeding programs worldwide although the crop was first introduced to the country in 1788. Breeders selected wheat with high adaptation to different Australian climates, while ensuring satisfactory yield and quality. This artificial selection left distinct genomic signatures that can be used to retrospectively understand breeding targets, and to detect economically important alleles. To study the effect of artificial selection on modern cultivars and cultivars released in different Australian states, we genotyped 482 Australian cultivars representing the history of wheat breeding in Australia since 1840. Computer simulation showed that 86 genomic regions were significantly affected by artificial selection. Characterization of 18 major genes known to affect wheat adaptation, yield, and quality revealed that many were affected by artificial selection and contained within regions under selection. Similarly, many reported QTL and genes for yield, quality, and adaptation were also contained in regions affected by artificial selection. These included TaCwi‐A1, TaGw2‐6A, Sus‐2B, TaSus1‐7A, TaSAP1‐7A, Glu‐A1, Glu‐B1, Glu‐B3, PinA, PinB, Ppo‐D1, Psy‐A1, Psy‐A2, Rht‐A1, Rht‐B1, Ppd‐D1, Vrn‐A1, Vrn‐B1, and Cre8. Interestingly, 17 regions affected by artificial selection were in moderate‐to‐high linkage disequilibrium with each other with an average r2 value of 0.35 indicating strong simultaneous selection on specific alleles. These regions included Glu‐B1, TaGw2‐6A, Cre8, Ppd‐D1, Rht‐B1, Vrn‐B1, TaSus1‐7A, TaSAP1‐7A, and Psy‐A1 plus multiple QTL affecting wheat yield and yield components. These results highlighted the effects of the long‐term artificial selection on Australian wheat germplasm and identified putative regions underlying important traits in wheat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the introduction of wheat into Australia by the First Fleet settlers, germplasm from different geographical origins has been used to adapt wheat to the Australian climate through selection and breeding. In this paper, we used 482 cultivars, representing the breeding history of bread wheat in Australia since 1840, to characterize their diversity and population structure and to define the geographical ancestral background of Australian wheat germplasm. This was achieved by comparing them to a global wheat collection using in-silico chromosome painting based on SNP genotyping. The global collection involved 2,335 wheat accessions which was divided into 23 different geographical subpopulations. However, the whole set was reduced to 1,544 accessions to increase the differentiation and decrease the admixture among different global subpopulations to increase the power of the painting analysis. Our analysis revealed that the structure of Australian wheat germplasm and its geographic ancestors have changed significantly through time, especially after the Green Revolution. Before 1920, breeders used cultivars from around the world, but mainly Europe and Africa, to select potential cultivars that could tolerate Australian growing conditions. Between 1921 and 1970, a dependence on African wheat germplasm became more prevalent. Since 1970, a heavy reliance on InternationalMaize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) germplasm has persisted. Combining the results from linkage disequilibrium, population structure and in-silico painting revealed that the dependence on CIMMYT materials has varied among different Australian States, has shrunken the germplasm effective population size and produced larger linkage disequilibrium blocks. This study documents the evolutionary history of wheat breeding in Australia and provides an understanding for how the wheat genome has been adapted to local growing conditions. This information provides a guide for industry to assist with maintaining genetic diversity for long-term selection gains and to plan future breeding programs. Keywords: australian wheat, geographical ancestor, genetic diversity, in-silico chromosome painting, population structure, single nucleotide polymorphism [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]