16 results on '"van Exel, Job"'
Search Results
2. Development and Content Validation of the 10-item Well-being Instrument (WiX) for use in Economic Evaluation Studies
- Author
-
Voormolen, Daphne C., Bom, Judith A. M., de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., Brouwer, Werner B. F., and van Exel, Job
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. What Constitutes Well-being? Five Views Among Adult People from the Netherlands on what is Important for a Good Life
- Author
-
van der Deijl, Willem, Brouwer, Werner, and van Exel, Job
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Worker Well-Being: What it Is, and how it Should Be Measured
- Author
-
Wijngaards, Indy, King, Owen C., Burger, Martijn J., and van Exel, Job
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Content validation of the Well-being of Older People measure (WOOP)
- Author
-
Hackert, Mariska Q. N., van Exel, Job, and Brouwer, Werner B. F.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. A validation study of the ICECAP‑O in informal carers of people with dementia from eight European Countries
- Author
-
Perry‑Duxbury, Meg, van Exel, Job, Brouwer, Werner, Sköldunger, Anders, Gonçalves-Pereira, Manuel, Irving, Kate, Meyer, Gabriele, Selbaek, Geir, Woods, Bob, Zanetti, Orazio, Verhey, Frans, Wimo, Anders, and Handels, Ron L.H.
- Subjects
Construct validity ,ICECAP-O ,Informal care ,Dementia ,Well-being - Abstract
Purpose The pressure on healthcare budgets remains high, partially due to the ageing population. Economic evaluation can be a helpful tool to inform resource allocation in publicly financed systems. Such evaluations frequently use health-related outcome measures. However, in areas such as care of older people, improving health outcomes is not necessarily the main focus of care interventions and broader outcome measures, including outcomes for those providing informal care, may be preferred when evaluating such interventions. This paper validates a recently introduced well-being measure, the ICECAPO, in a population of informal carers for people with dementia from eight European countries. Methods Convergent and discriminant validity tests were performed to validate the ICECAP-O using data obtained in a sample of 451 respondents from Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and the UK. These respondents completed a number of standardized questionnaires within the framework of the Actifcare project. Results The ICECAP-O performed well among informal carers, in terms of both convergent and discriminant validity. In the multivariate analysis, it was found to be significantly associated with the age of the person with dementia, EQ-5D-5L health problem index of the person with dementia, carer–patient relationship, care recipient CDR, carer LSNS Score, the PAI score, and Perseverance Time. Conclusion The ICECAP-O appears to be a valid measure of well-being in informal carers for people with dementia. The ICECAP-O may therefore be useful as an outcome measure in economic evaluations of interventions aimed at such informal carers, when these aim to improve well-being beyond health.
- Published
- 2019
7. Correction: Braving the waves: exploring capability well-being patterns in seven European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Author
-
Himmler, Sebastian, van Exel, Job, Brouwer, Werner, Neumann-Böhme, Sebastian, Sabat, Iryna, Schreyögg, Jonas, Stargardt, Tom, Barros, Pedro Pita, and Torbica, Aleksandra
- Subjects
COVID-19 pandemic ,WELL-being - Abstract
This document is a correction notice for an article titled "Braving the waves: exploring capability well-being patterns in seven European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic" published in the European Journal of Health Economics. The correction addresses an error in the author's name, which was incorrectly written as Neuman-Böhme instead of Neumann-Böhme. The original article has been updated to reflect the correct name. The publisher, Springer Nature, maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims and institutional affiliations. The authors of the article are Sebastian Himmler, Job van Exel, Werner Brouwer, Sebastian Neumann-Böhme, Iryna Sabat, Jonas Schreyögg, Tom Stargardt, Pedro Pita Barros, and Aleksandra Torbica. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Estimating the monetary value of health and capability well-being applying the well-being valuation approach.
- Author
-
Himmler, Sebastian, van Exel, Job, and Brouwer, Werner
- Subjects
WELL-being ,QUALITY of life ,MEDICAL technology ,CAPABILITIES approach (Social sciences) ,DECISION making - Abstract
Background: Quality of life measures going beyond health, like the ICECAP-A, are gaining importance in health technology assessment. The assessment of the monetary value of gains in this broader quality of life is needed to use these measurements in a cost-effectiveness framework. Methods: We applied the well-being valuation approach to calculate a first monetary value for capability well-being in comparison to health, derived by ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L, respectively. Data from an online survey administered in February 2018 to a representative sample of UK citizens aged 18–65 was used (N = 1512). To overcome the endogeneity of income, we applied an instrumental variable regression. Several alternative model specifications were calculated to test the robustness of the results. Results: The base case empirical estimate for the implied monetary value of a year in full capability well-being was £66,597. The estimate of the monetary value of a QALY, obtained from the same sample and using the same methodology amounted to £30,786, which compares well to previous estimates from the willingness to pay literature. Throughout the conducted robustness checks, the value of capability well-being was found to be between 1.7 and 2.6 times larger than the value of health. Conclusion: While the applied approach is not without limitations, the generated insights, especially concerning the relative magnitude of valuations, may be useful for decision-makers having to decide based on economic evaluations using the ICECAP-A measure or, to a lesser extent, other (capability) well-being outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. A validation study of the ICECAP-O in informal carers of people with dementia from eight European Countries.
- Author
-
Perry-Duxbury, Meg, van Exel, Job, Brouwer, Werner, Sköldunger, Anders, Gonçalves-Pereira, Manuel, Irving, Kate, Meyer, Gabriele, Selbæk, Geir, Woods, Bob, Zanetti, Orazio, Verhey, Frans, Wimo, Anders, Handels, Ron L.H., and Actifcare Consortium
- Subjects
- *
DEMENTIA , *OLDER people , *TEST validity , *RESOURCE allocation , *POPULATION aging - Abstract
Purpose: The pressure on healthcare budgets remains high, partially due to the ageing population. Economic evaluation can be a helpful tool to inform resource allocation in publicly financed systems. Such evaluations frequently use health-related outcome measures. However, in areas such as care of older people, improving health outcomes is not necessarily the main focus of care interventions and broader outcome measures, including outcomes for those providing informal care, may be preferred when evaluating such interventions. This paper validates a recently introduced well-being measure, the ICECAP-O, in a population of informal carers for people with dementia from eight European countries.Methods: Convergent and discriminant validity tests were performed to validate the ICECAP-O using data obtained in a sample of 451 respondents from Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and the UK. These respondents completed a number of standardized questionnaires within the framework of the Actifcare project.Results: The ICECAP-O performed well among informal carers, in terms of both convergent and discriminant validity. In the multivariate analysis, it was found to be significantly associated with the age of the person with dementia, EQ-5D-5L health problem index of the person with dementia, carer-patient relationship, care recipient CDR, carer LSNS Score, the PAI score, and Perseverance Time.Conclusion: The ICECAP-O appears to be a valid measure of well-being in informal carers for people with dementia. The ICECAP-O may therefore be useful as an outcome measure in economic evaluations of interventions aimed at such informal carers, when these aim to improve well-being beyond health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Adaptation in life satisfaction and self-assessed health to disability - Evidence from the UK.
- Author
-
Stöckel, Jannis, van Exel, Job, and Brouwer, Werner B.F.
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL quality control , *WELL-being , *SCIENTIFIC observation , *SOCIAL services case management , *SATISFACTION , *SURVEYS , *QUALITY of life , *VOCATIONAL rehabilitation , *LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
Experiencing deteriorating health has implications for your quality of life. The theory of adaptation suggests that with time spend living in a health state individuals can adapt, resulting in observed quality of life levels to revert or stagnate despite persistently decreased health. Adaptation has implications for the use of subjective quality of life indicators when quantifying the impact of health changes or the benefits from new medical technologies. As both the impact from ill health and the benefit from new interventions might be disease- or subgroup-specific adaptation further raises ethical concerns but empirical evidence on its existence, magnitude, and heterogeneity remains inconclusive. This paper uses a general population sample of 9,543 individuals that participate in the UK Understanding Society survey and experience the onset of a long-standing illness or disability to provide evidence on these questions. Using ordered-response fixed effects models we explore longitudinal changes in self-assessed health and life satisfaction around the onset of disability. Our results indicate that disability onset is associated with large decreases in subjective health and well-being. Over time this initial decrease in subjective quality of life indicators attenuates, especially in life satisfaction and to a lesser extent for self-assessed health. While the relative difference in adaptation across these two measures remains persistent, we find that across demographic and severity groups the initial impact of disability onset and adaptation differs considerably in its magnitude. These results have important implications for studies aiming to quantify the impact of health conditions on quality of life outcomes, especially when using observational datasets. • Adaptation is particularly pronounced in life satisfaction. • Across subgroups adaptation in life satisfaction differs. • In self-assessed health adaptation is limited with no differences across subgroups. • When using well-being measures adaptation could distort measured disease impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Quality of Life of Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: Validation of the German Version of the ICECAP-O.
- Author
-
Makai, Peter, Beckebans, Franziska, van Exel, Job, and Brouwer, Werner B. F.
- Subjects
QUALITY of life ,NURSING care facilities ,NURSING home patients ,DEMENTIA patients ,DISEASES in older people ,WELL-being ,CROSS-sectional method - Abstract
Objectives: To validate the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure’s German translation in older people with dementia living in a nursing home, and to investigate the influence of proxy characteristics on responses. Method: Cross-sectional study. For 95 residents living in a German nursing home, questionnaires were completed by nursing professionals serving as proxy respondents. We investigated the convergent validity of the ICECAP-O with other Quality of Life (Qol) measures, the EQ-5D extended with a cognitive dimension (EQ-5D+C), the Alzheimer’s Disease Related Quality of Life (ADRQL) measures, and the Barthel-index measure of Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Discriminant validity was investigated using bivariate and multivariate stepwise regression analysis, comparing ICECAP-O scores between subgroups varying in dementia severity, care dependency, ADL status and demographic characteristics. Results: Convergent validity between the ICECAP-O, EQ-5D+C, ADRQL and Barthel-Index scores was moderate to good (with correlations of 0.72, 0.69 and 0.53 respectively), but differed considerably between dimensions of the instruments. Discriminant validity was confirmed by finding differences in ICECAP-O scores between subgroups based on ADL scores (0.58 below 65 points on the Barthel-index and 0.80 above 65 points) and other characteristics. The ICECAP-O scores based on available tariffs were related to proxy characteristics gender (0.52 males versus 0.65 females) and work experience (0.61 below 2 years of experience versus 0.68 above 2 years). Discussion: The results of this study suggest that the ICECAP-O is a promising generic measure for general Qol and capability of people with dementia living in a nursing home. Validity tests generally yielded favorable results. Work experience and gender appeared to influence proxy response, which raises questions regarding appropriate proxies, especially since the ICECAP-O may be completed by proxies relatively often. Further research is necessary to validate the German version of the ICECAP-O, with specific attention to proxy completion for people with dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Measuring the impact of caregiving on informal carers: a construct validation study of the CarerQol instrument.
- Author
-
Hoefman, Renske J., van Exel, Job, and Brouwer, Werner B. F.
- Subjects
- *
SERVICES for caregivers , *CARE of people with disabilities , *CAREGIVERS , *WELL-being , *MEDICAL decision making - Abstract
Background Informal caregivers provide a significant part of the total care needed by ill or disabled persons. Although informal care is often the preferred option of those who provide and those who receive informal care, caring can nevertheless be very straining. This study investigates construct validation of an instrument of the impact of caregiving, the CarerQol. Methods Data was collected among adult caregivers (n = 1,244) selected from the general population using an online questionnaire in October 2010, in the Netherlands. The CarerQol measures and values the impact of informal care. The CarerQol measures subjective burden (CarerQol- 7D) and well-being (CarerQol-VAS). Construct validation comprised clinical, convergent and discriminative validity tests. Results Clinical validity was supported by statistically significant associations of CarerQol-VAS and caregivers' health, income and employment status, care recipients' health, and the relationship between caregiver and care recipient. Convergent validity was supported by positive associations of CarerQol-VAS with the two positive CarerQol-7D dimensions (fulfilment and support) and negative associations with the five negative CarerQol-7D dimensions (relational problems, mental health problems, problems combining daily activities, financial problems and physical health problems). Moreover, CarerQol-VAS was negatively associated with other instruments measuring caregiving burden. Conclusions Construct validity tests in a large, heterogeneous sample of caregivers show that the CarerQol validly measures the impact of caregiving. The CarerQol can be used in informal care research and economic evaluations of health care interventions. Hence, its use can facilitate informed decision making in health care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Construct Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the 10-Item Well-Being Instrument for Use in Economic Evaluation Studies.
- Author
-
Bom, Judith A.M., Voormolen, Daphne C., Brouwer, Werner B.F., de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., and van Exel, Job
- Subjects
- *
WELL-being , *STATISTICAL reliability , *TEST validity , *CRONBACH'S alpha , *EXPLORATORY factor analysis , *INTRACLASS correlation - Abstract
Economic evaluations of interventions in health and social care require outcome measures that capture their full benefits, including those beyond health. This study aimed to assess construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of the newly developed 10-item Well-being instrument (WiX). Data were gathered via an online survey in a representative sample of the adult general population in The Netherlands (N = 1045). Construct validity was assessed by inspecting convergent, structural, and discriminant validity, following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments methodology. Regression analyses of the WiX and its items on other validated measures of well-being were performed to assess the convergent validity of the instrument and the relevance of its items. Dimensionality of the WiX was assessed using exploratory factor analysis. To assess discriminant validity, several hypotheses in terms of well-being differences were assessed. Finally, a second survey was sent out 2 weeks after the initial survey (n = 563; 53.9% response rate) to assess the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the WiX. The WiX showed to be correlated with alternative well-being measures as expected and able to sufficiently differentiate between relevant subgroups in the population. Moreover, the dimensionality analysis indicated that the WiX captures a broad array of elements relevant to well-being, including physical and mental health. The test-retest reliability was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82. The results regarding the WiX are favorable and indicate that this new instrument may be a promising alternative for existing measures of well-being for evaluating interventions in health and social care. • Economic evaluations of interventions in health and social care require outcome measures that capture their full benefits, including those beyond health. For this purpose, outcome measures capturing overall well-being comprehensively are needed. • The 10-item Well-being instrument (WiX) was developed to improve welfare economic evaluations in the field of health and social care, while also allowing comparisons with interventions in other sectors or across sectors. The WiX comprehensively measures the satisfaction of members of the adult population on 10 important domains of well-being. • The WiX seems to be a promising alternative for existing measures of well-being for evaluating interventions in health and social care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Well-being of Older People (WOOP): Quantitative validation of a new outcome measure for use in economic evaluations.
- Author
-
Hackert, Mariska Q.N., van Exel, Job, and Brouwer, Werner B.F.
- Subjects
- *
GERIATRIC assessment , *DISCRIMINANT analysis , *FACTOR analysis , *INTERNET , *MENTAL health , *PSYCHOMETRICS , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *REGRESSION analysis , *PSYCHOLOGICAL resilience , *STATISTICS , *SURVEYS , *QUANTITATIVE research , *STATISTICAL reliability , *WELL-being , *RESEARCH methodology evaluation , *OLD age ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
There is a need for comprehensive measures to evaluate the benefits of health and social care services for older people. The newly developed Well-being of Older People measure (WOOP) aims to capture all aspects that older people find important to their well-being. This study explores the validity and test-retest reliability of the WOOP. Between December 2017 and January 2018, an online survey was used to retrieve data from 1113 people aged 65 years and older in the Netherlands. Regression analyses on Cantril's Ladder scores were conducted to explore the relative importance of the items of the WOOP. Dimensionality was checked using exploratory factor analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity were investigated by relating the WOOP to several measures of health and well-being. Test-retest reliability was examined using data from 269 respondents that participated in a second online survey, distributed one week after the first. The items of the WOOP were significantly associated with Cantril's Ladder scores. When regressed simultaneously this was still true for all but the 'social contacts' item and one level of the 'acceptance and resilience' item. The dimensionality analysis revealed three factors, of which two included items of the WOOP and the EQ-5D-5L and the third only items of the WOOP. The WOOP correlated moderately to highly with physical health, and (very) highly with (mental) health and well-being measures. The test-retest reliability in terms of ICC was high, whereas the kappa for the items was fair to good, except for two items. Overall, the WOOP seems to capture aspects relevant to the well-being of older people adequately, and the results of first validity and reliability tests were satisfactory. Before the WOOP can be used in economic evaluations, further validation in a variety of health and social care settings is recommended, and utility weights need to be determined. • First quantitative validation of the Well-being of Older People measure (WOOP). • Which captures a comprehensive set of well-being domains relevant to older people. • Validity and test-retest reliability were satisfactory among Dutch older people. • The WOOP appears to be a promising outcome measure for use in economic evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Estimating an anchored utility tariff for the well-being of older people measure (WOOP) for the Netherlands.
- Author
-
Himmler, Sebastian, Jonker, Marcel, van Krugten, Frédérique, Hackert, Mariska, van Exel, Job, and Brouwer, Werner
- Subjects
- *
WELL-being , *SOCIAL support , *RESEARCH methodology evaluation , *MENTAL health , *MEDICAL care costs , *PSYCHOMETRICS , *SOCIOECONOMIC factors , *COST effectiveness , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *QUALITY of life - Abstract
Health economic evaluations using common health-related quality of life measures may fall short in adequately incorporating all relevant benefits of health and social care interventions targeted at older people. The Well-being of Older People measure (WOOP) is a broader well-being measure that comprises nine well-being domains. The objective of this study was to estimate a utility tariff for the WOOP, to facilitate its application in cost-utility analyses. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with duration approach was set up and fielded among 2,012 individuals from the Netherlands aged 65 years and above. Matched pairwise choice tasks, colour-coding and level overlap were used to reduce the cognitive burden of the DCE. The choice tasks were created using a Bayesian heterogeneous D-efficient design. The estimation procedure accommodated for nonlinear time preferences via an exponential discounting function. The estimation results showed that 'physical health', 'mental health', and 'making ends meet' were the most important well-being domains for older people, followed by 'independence' and 'living situation'. Of somewhat lesser importance were domains like 'social life', 'receiving support' and 'feeling useful'. The generated utility tariffs can be used to translate well-being states described with the WOOP to a utility score between −0.616 and 1. This study established a tariff for the WOOP, which will facilitate its use in economic evaluations of health and social care interventions targeted at older people, first of all in the Netherlands. • A choice experiment was used to create weights for a novel well-being measure. • This enables the use of the WOOP instrument in economic evaluations of elderly care. • Health, independence, and financial stability were the most important dimensions. • Social contact, receiving support, or feeling useful were less important. • Study adopted methodological advances in utility measurement and choice task design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Views of older people in the Netherlands on wellbeing: A Q-methodology study.
- Author
-
Hackert, Mariska Q.N., Brouwer, Werner B.F., Hoefman, Renske J., and van Exel, Job
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL care for older people , *AUTONOMY (Psychology) , *BIOMECHANICS , *FACTOR analysis , *FRAIL elderly , *HEALTH status indicators , *INTERPERSONAL relations , *INTERVIEWING , *LIFE skills , *MENTAL health , *RELIGION , *SOCIAL skills , *SPOUSES , *FINANCIAL management , *JUDGMENT sampling , *FAMILY relations , *SOCIAL support , *WELL-being , *PATIENT-centered care - Abstract
Population ageing and restricted budgets result in the need for an efficient allocation of scarce resources in care services for older people. As these services tend to address more than only health, diverse wellbeing measures have been developed to assess their benefits in economic evaluations. These measures are grounded in research on wellbeing of older people and its determinants. Little is known about possible heterogeneity in this context and the extent to which wellbeing measures cover the aspects of wellbeing that are most important to older people with different views on wellbeing. We conducted a Q-methodology study between December 2016 and October 2017 to investigate the variety in views among people aged 65 and older in the Netherlands on what is important to their wellbeing. A purposive sample of 53 respondents ranked 34 opinion statements according to importance to their wellbeing and explained their ranking during a follow-up interview. Data were analysed using by-person factor analysis to identify common patterns in the rankings of the statements. Five distinct views were extracted in which different aspects were considered important: (I) health, financial security and a life partner; (II) family, support and physical functioning (III); autonomy, mental health and helping others; (IV) social contacts, support, mental health and religion; and (V) a life partner, social contacts, living environment and adaptation. This heterogeneity in views of older people on what constitutes wellbeing supports the use of person-centered approaches in care services for older people. Arguably, (evaluations of) policies and services for older people should take this plurality into consideration. • Little is known about the views of older people on what constitutes wellbeing. • This study found five distinct views on what they find important for wellbeing. • Each view accentuates specific domains or aspects within domains of wellbeing. • Only the domains health and social relations were important in most views. • Health and social care services for older people should consider this plurality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.