Search

Weeds are a major constraint to canola (Brassica napus L.) production, reducing grain yield and quality. The repeated use of pre- and post- emergent herbicides to control several grasses and broadleaf weeds has escalated the problem of herbicide resistance in weeds. The development of herbicide-tolerant canola cultivars has increased the flexibility of weed management but has also increased the risks of outcrossing with wild relatives and weed shifts to resistance. Herbicide-resistant weed species, and the related biological repercussions, pose a major threat to sustainable weed management. These developing risks have led researchers to examine integrated weed management (IWM) techniques for sustainable weed control. Weed control strategies using non-chemical tactics have valid roles for managing weeds. However, in broad-acre commercial fields, the effectiveness of several non-chemical selections are less proven than commercial chemical herbicides. Canola competition and allelopathy for weed suppression are potential components for integrated weed management in canola. This review examines current chemical and non-chemical options available for developing IWM strategies for profitable canola production, as well as future research directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rapid spread of herbicide-resistant weeds coupled with the decline in the number of new herbicide modes-of-action under development poses a serious threat to the future productivity of canola ( Brassica napus L.). Crop competition is now an essential component of integrated weed management to reduce weed impacts and retard the spread of resistance. Canola plays an important role in any cereal-dominated crop rotation by providing diversification to broaden options for weed management, as well as other agronomic benefits for disease, pest and nutrition management. This review examines the opportunities to manipulate canola agronomy and increase the competitive ability by choice of cultivar, seeding rate, row spacing and orientation, and fertilizer use. The integration of such options for weed management prolongs the effectiveness and availability of herbicides. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav. is considered as one of the worst weeds of crop and pasture systems in temperate Australia. Effective long-term control is difficult due to the extensive root system. Field experiments were conducted at two locations in south-eastern Australia between 2006 and 2008 to examine a range of herbicides for control of S. elaeagnifolium on seed production and root regrowth. Herbicide performance was affected by herbicide, weed growth stage and environmental factors. Pyridine herbicides, such as pre-packed mixtures of aminopyralid + fluroxypyr and triclopyr + picloram + aminopyralid were the most effective and consistently reduced within-season aerial growth by 60–90% in both seasons. Overall control using glyphosate-based treatments was generally reduced due to emergence of new stems following herbicide application. Three picloram-based treatments provided the best and most consistent long-term control on root regrowth after two seasons, reducing stem emergence by 45–88%, especially with a late application of herbicides. The efficacy of residual herbicides such as atrazine or imazapic + imazapyr depends on rainfall conditions. Seedset control was best achieved with herbicides applied at the start of flowering stage, with no viable seed produced following treatments of 2,4-D amine + picloram and triclopyr + picloram + aminopyralid. These two treatments also significantly reduced viable seed production when applied at the early berry stage. The results indicate that an application at early flowering followed by a late application in autumn is necessary to effectively control the seedset (seedbank) and the root regrowth (rootbank) of S. elaeagnifolium . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allelopathy is one crop attribute that could be incorporated in an integrated weed management system as a supplement to synthetic herbicides. However, the underlying principles of crop allelopathy and secondary metabolite production are still poorly understood including in canola. In this study, an allelopathic bioassay and a metabolomic analysis were conducted to compare three non-allelopathic and three allelopathic canola genotypes. Results from the laboratory bioassay showed that there were significant differences among canola genotypes in their ability to inhibit root and shoot growth of the receiver annual ryegrass; impacts ranged from 14% (cv. Atr-409) to 76% (cv. Pak85388-502) and 0% (cv. Atr-409) to 45% (cv. Pak85388-502) inhibition respectively. The root length of canola also differed significantly between genotypes, there being a non-significant negative interaction (r = -0.71; y = 0.303x + 21.33) between the root length of donor canola and of receiver annual ryegrass. Variation in chemical composition was detected between organs (root extracts, shoot extracts) and root exudates and also between canola genotypes. Root extracts contained more secondary metabolites than shoot extracts while fewer compounds were recorded in the root exudates. Individual compound assessments identified a total of 14 secondary metabolites which were identified from the six tested genotypes. However, only Pak85388-502 and Av-opal exuded sinapyl alcohol, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and 3,5,6,7,8-pentahydroxy flavones in agar growth medium, suggesting that the synergistic effect of these compounds playing a role for canola allelopathy against annual ryegrass in vitro. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Total reliance on herbicides for weed control is unsustainable with the spread of herbicide resistance and the environmental need to reduce pesticide use. Strongly competitive wheat crops that have high tolerance to weed pressure and therefore maintain high yields in the presence of weeds are a low-cost option for reducing dependence on herbicides. We examined the feasibility of selecting for wheat tolerance to weeds by crossing varieties differing for traits associated with competitiveness. Competitive ability and yield potential must be treated as separate traits for selection. Current measures of crop tolerance to weed competition do not separate the two traits so that selection based on these measures is often synonymous with selection for yield potential rather than pure tolerance. We propose a new measure, termed Incremental Crop Tolerance (ICT) that reflects the incremental yield difference between genotypes associated with tolerance, over and above differences in underlying yield potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]