Search

The aim of this study was to expand the International Water Association Activated Sludge Model No. 2d (ASM2d) to account for a newly defined readily biodegradable substrate that can be consumed by polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) under anoxic and aerobic conditions, but not under anaerobic conditions. The model change was to add a new substrate component and process terms for its use by PAOs and other heterotrophic bacteria under anoxic and aerobic conditions. The Gdansk (Poland) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), which has a modified University of Cape Town (MUCT) process for nutrient removal, provided field data and mixed liquor for batch tests for model evaluation. The original ASM2d was first calibrated under dynamic conditions with the results of batch tests with settled wastewater and mixed liquor, in which nitrate-uptake rates, phosphorus-release rates, and anoxic phosphorus uptake rates were followed. Model validation was conducted with data from a 96-hour measurement campaign in the full-scale WWTP. The results of similar batch tests with ethanol and fusel oil as the external carbon sources were used to adjust kinetic and stoichiometric coefficients in the expanded ASM2d. Both models were compared based on their predictions of the effect of adding supplemental carbon to the anoxic zone of an MUCT process. In comparison with the ASM2d, the new model better predicted the anoxic behaviors of carbonaceous oxygen demand, nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), and phosphorous (PO4-P) in batch experiments with ethanol and fusel oil. However, when simulating ethanol addition to the anoxic zone of a full-scale biological nutrient removal facility, both models predicted similar effluent NO3-N concentrations (6.6 to 6.9 g N/m3). For the particular application, effective enhanced biological phosphorus removal was predicted by both models with external carbon addition but, for the new model, the effluent PO4-P concentration was approximately one-half of that found from ASM2d. On a PO4-P removal percentage basis, the difference was small, that is, 94.1 vs. 97.1%, respectively, for the ASM2d and expanded ASM2d.

The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence and fate of colloidal and dissolved organic nitrogen (CON and DON) across biological nutrient removal (BNR) activated sludge bioreactors. Primary and secondary effluent total nitrogen (TN) measurements and component fractionation, CON and DON concentration profiles across BNR bioreactors, and laboratory batch experiments with the process mixed liquor were carried out at several full-scale BNR plants in northern Poland. The organic nitrogen (ON) components were divided into high CON, low CON, and DON based on sequential filtration through 1.2, 0.45 and 0.1 μm pore-size filters. The average influent DON(0.1 μm) (<0.1 μm) concentrations ranged from 1.1 g N/m(3) to 3.9 g N/m(3) and accounted for only 4-13% of total organic nitrogen. In the effluents, however, this contribution increased to 12-45% (the DON(0.1 μm) concentrations varied in a narrow range of 0.5-1.3 g N/m(3)). Conversions of ON inside the bioreactors were investigated in more detail in two largest plants, i.e. Gdansk (565,000 PE) and Gdynia (516,000 PE). Inside the two studied bioreactors, the largest reductions of the colloidal fraction were found to occur in the anaerobic and anoxic compartments, whereas an increase of DON(0.1 μm) concentrations was observed under aerobic conditions in the last compartment. Batch experiments with the process mixed liquor confirmed that DON(0.1 μm) was explicitly produced in the aerobic phase and significant amounts of ON were converted in the anoxic phase of the experiments., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The WERF Nutrient Challenge is a multi-year collaborative research initiative established in 2007 to develop and provide current information about wastewater treatment nutrients (specifically nitrogen and phosphorus in wastewater), their characteristics, and bioavailability in aquatic environments to help regulators make informed decisions. The Nutrient Challenge will also provide data on nutrient removal so that treatment facilities can select sustainable, cost-effective methods and technologies to meet permit limits. To meet these goals, the Nutrient Challenge has teamed with a wide array of utilities, agencies, consultants, universities and other researchers and practitioners to collaborate on projects that advance these goals. The Nutrient Challenge is focusing on a different approach to collaborating and leveraging resources (financial and intellectual) on research projects by targeting existing projects and research that correspond with its goals and funding those aspects that the Nutrient Challenge identified as a priority. Because the Nutrient Challenge is focused on collaboration, outreach is an absolutely necessary component of its effectiveness. Through workshops, webinars, a web portal and online compendium, published papers, and conference lectures, the Nutrient Challenge is both presenting important new information, and soliciting new partnerships.

Estrogens from anthropogenic and livestock sources are a serious concern for aquatic ecosystems at concentrations less than 1 ng/L Fundamental process parameters to reduce estrogenic activity were investigated for two biotreatment methods: heterotrophic bacterial degradation in municipal activated sludge (AS) and a nitration process that is applicable to high NH4-N wastewaters. Batch tests with estrogen and nitro-estrogen compounds were conducted at nanogram per liter concentrations with mixed liquor from an AS wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) operating at a 3 day solids retention time (SRT) and a membrane bioreactor (MBR) WWTF operating at a 30-40 day SRT. The estrogenic activities of estrone (E1), 17beta-estradiol (E2), and 17alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) were reduced 80-97% following nitration. First-order biological degradation rate coefficients (kb) of the nitrated estrogens were 10-50% lower than the parent estrogen compounds. The kb values for EE2 in MBR and AS mixed liquors were similar, 1.67 and 1.63 L/gVSS-day respectively, indicating that the bacteria responsible for EE2 degradation were present at long and short SRTs. The kb values for E1 and E2 were 2 orders of magnitude greater than for EE2. EE2 degradation was 7.5 times faster in the presence of E1 and E2, and no effect was observed with other estrogen mixtures.

Understanding estrogen-removal mechanisms in wastewater treatment is imperative, as estrogens have environmental effects at trace concentrations. Previous research investigating co-metabolic degradation of 17alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) revealed that, in batch tests where high nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N) concentrations occurred as a result of ammonia-nitrogen (NH4-N) oxidation by AOB, an abiotic estrogen nitration reaction actually was occurring--not co-metabolic degradation. This paper addresses nitration kinetics. A first-order abiotic nitration model was developed that predicts nitration of EE2, 17beta-estradiol (E2), and estrone (El) as a function of temperature, pH, estrogen (EE2, E2, and E1), and NO2-N concentration. A contact time of 3.6 to 4.1 days is required for 90% estrogen nitration at 500 mg/L NO2-N and pH 6.4. At 20 degrees C and pH 6.4, the threshold NO2-N concentration for nitration to occur is 9 mg/L; therefore, estrogen nitration is not likely in activated sludge treatment of domestic wastewater, but has potential for high-NH4-N-strength wastewaters.

Site evaluation for bioremediation of chlorinated ethenes may need treatability studies to assess the reductive dechlorination potential of vinyl chloride (VC). Dehalogenation of vinyl bromide (VB) was investigated as a surrogate measurement for the dechlorination potential of VC. VB dehalogenation rates and kinetics were studied and compared with those of VC by a methanogenic reductive dechlorinating enrichment culture that was dominated by Dehalococcoides species and by microcosms from two chloroethene-contaminated sites. The enrichment culture dehalogenated VB to ethene at higher rates than VC at similar concentrations. VB was dehalogenated with a higher enzyme affinity than was VC, as indicated by their half-velocity constants, 240 +/- 150 and 21 +/- 8 microM, for VC and VB, respectively. Cross-inhibition study exhibited some evidence for competitive inhibition between VC and VB, suggesting that their degradation might be catalyzed by the same enzyme in the culture. Laboratory microcosm studies using subsurface soil and groundwater from two contaminated sites demonstrated that the production of the reductive dehalogenation product (ethene) could be detected faster with VB as a substrate than with VC. As a result, a substantially shorter (up to 5-10 times) incubation time would be required to detect the same level of reductive dehalogenation activity using VB as a surrogate for VC in treatability assessments.