Search

This study investigated the best way to combine nanofiltration (NF) and Fenton with membrane bioreactor inoculated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (MBRy) for the treatment of landfill leachate, aiming at compliance with legislation and water reuse. Firstly, the permeate from MBRy was treated by Fenton process followed by NF (MBRy - Fenton - NF). Another alternative evaluated was the polishment of MBRy permeate by NF and treatment of NF concentrate by Fenton process (MBRy - NF - Fenton (concentrate) ). COD removal in the Fenton step was optimized according to central composite design (CCD) and 85.5% removal was obtained at pH = 3, Fe 2+ :H 2 O 2 molar ratio = 1:9.81 and C:H 2 O 2 molar ratio = 1:1.14. Increased toxicity was observed with the Fenton application (EC 50  = 2.45%). The NF showed the best performance treating the MBRy permeate. High permeate flux (8.9 ± 1.6 L h -1 m -2 ) and ion rejection (82 ± 4.2%), and low membrane fouling was observed in this condition. Although both NF permeate presented potential for reuse, the final COD concentration was lower in the MBRy - Fenton effluent (88 mg L -1 ). The Fenton application for the NF concentrate was able to remove 87.24% of COD. With a preliminary economic analysis, it was verified that the MBRy - NF - Fenton (concentrate) combination is the most advantageous due to the lower chemical reagent and membrane area requirements. Thus, this route presents itself as an alternative for landfill leachate reclamation., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In this study, commercial baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) was employed as a novel inoculum for a membrane bioreactor (MBRy). It was applied to landfill leachate (LFL) treatment to remove recalcitrant organic compounds as well as for the assimilation of recalcitrant compounds, since yeasts have a high ability to break such compounds down. The MBR was inoculated with 10 g L -1 of commercial baker's yeast and was operated at a hydraulic retention time of 48 h and pH of 3.5. The specific air demand based on the membrane area (SADm) was maintained at 0.6 m 3 h -1 m -2 . The MBRy achieved chemical oxygen demand (COD), color, NH 3 , and humic substances removal of 68, 79, 68, and 50%, respectively. Furthermore, the MBRy showed lower fouling potential, which can be attributed to the low extracellular polymeric substances production, as the formation of a cake layer was the major mechanism of membrane fouling. The work demonstrated that novel MBR is a promising technology for treating recalcitrant landfill leachate.

The startup process of a membrane bioreactor inoculated with yeast biomass (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and used in the treatment of landfill leachate was evaluated. The yeast membrane bioreactor (MBRy) was inoculated with an exogenous inoculum, a granulated active dry commercial bakers' yeast. The MBRy was successfully started up with a progressive increase in the landfill leachate percentage in the MBRy feed and the use of Sabouraud Dextrose Broth. The membrane plays an important role in the startup phase because of its full biomass retention and removal of organic matter. MBRy is a suitable and promising process to treat recalcitrant landfill leachate. After the acclimation period, the COD and NH 3 removal efficiency reached values of 72 ± 3% and 39 ± 2% respectively. MBRy shows a low membrane-fouling potential. The membrane fouling was influenced by soluble microbial products, extracellular polymeric substances, sludge particle size, and colloidal dissolved organic carbon.

The purpose of this article is to characterize and compare the residual COD of raw landfill leachate and its low and high molecular weight fractions before and after aerobic degradation process. The low and high molecular weight fractions (<10 kDa and >10 kDa, respectively) were obtained by the use of an ultrafiltration cell. Samples of the fractions with molecular weights 10 kDa, as well as the raw leachate, were characterized in terms of COD, protein, carbohydrate and lipid concentration and by biodegradability test. The compound identification of all samples was carried out using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The results show that the landfill leachate studied is constituted of approximately 60% of compounds with molecular weight <10 kDa. Approximately 80% of the compounds identified in the leachate had been degraded. This is an indication that most of the compounds that constitute the significant fraction of residual COD correspond to intermediate products and products of condensation of affluent compounds or had been generated during the degradation (SMP). Similar compounds were identified in all effluents of the degradation assay, suggesting the presence of SMP. These compounds, predominantly aliphatic and esters, are characterized by high molecular weight and probable refractory nature.

This article aims to evaluate membrane contactors capability to remove and recover ammonia from landfill leachate (LFL). A hydrophobic hollow fiber membrane module was used to achieve such purpose. A sulfuric acid diluted solution was used as extraction solution to speed up ammonia content removal. Several factors that have influence on ammonia removal and recovery capability such as ammonia solution pH, concentration of sulfuric acid solutions and flow rate of liquid phases have been examined. Microfiltration was the method used as pretreatment. The results have shown that membrane contactor operated with LFL (pH 10), 0.1 M acid solution and liquid flow rate up to 0.5 L min -1 achieved 99.9% of ammonia removal, which corresponds to 79.1% of ammonia recovery from the extraction solution, and it is capable to produce highly purified ammonium sulfate solutions (41.2%, wt wt -1 ) to be used as fertilizer. The concentration of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) in the residual LFL complies with Brazilian law requirements of 20.0 mg L -1 of TAN, regarding the disposal of effluents.

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the integration of the air stripping, membrane bioreactor (MBR) and nanofiltration (NF) processes for the treatment of landfill leachate (LFL). Pretreatment by air stripping, without adjustment of pH, removed 65% of N-NH3 present in LFL. After pretreatment, the effluent was treated in MBR obtaining 44% of COD removal, and part of the N-NH3 was converted to nitrite and nitrate, which was later removed in the post-treatment. Nanofiltration was shown to be an effective process to improve the removal of organic compounds, the high toxicity present in LFL and nitrite and nitrate generated in the MBR. The system (air stripping + MBR + nanofiltration) obtained great efficiency of removal in most parameters analyzed, with overall removal of COD, ammonia, color and toxicity approximately 88, 95, 100 and 100%, respectively. By this route, treated landfill leachate may be reused at the landfill as water for dust arrestment and also as earth work on construction sites.

A high content of refractory organic matter, ammonia and toxic compounds is characteristic of landfill leachate. Advanced oxidative processes (AOPs) are an attractive alternative for landfill leachate treatment. However, when applied as a unique process treatment, they do not provide a complete solution for the effluent treatment. Combining AOP with a membrane separation process (MSP) presents a number of benefits and provides an adequate solution for this problem. With this in mind, the present work aims to evaluate, using a bench scale, leachate treatability through AOP by Fenton's reagent (AOP/Fenton) combined with microfiltration (MF) and nanofiltration (NF). A high efficient removal of COD (63%), true color (76%) and humic substances (50%) was observed during AOP/Fenton under optimized conditions (1.7 g H(2)O(2)/g COD(raw)(leachate); FeSO(4) · 7H(2)O:H(2)O(2)=1:5.3; pH=3.8; reaction conditions = 115 rpm/28 min). According to the evaluated parameters, MSP presented an efficient complementary treatment, in which the integrity of the stages was sufficient for reaching regulatory levels in the effluent (Deliberação Normativa Conjunta COPAM/CERH-MG N(o). 1, May 5, 2008)., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)