Search

Background: Dravet Syndrome (DS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy starting in infancy and characterised by treatment resistant epilepsy with cognitive impairment and progressive motor dysfunction. Walking becomes markedly impaired with age, but the mechanical nature of gait problems remains unclear., Research Question: What are the kinetic strategies characterised in gait of patients with DS?, Methods: This case-control study compared 41 patients with DS aged 5.2-26.1 years (19 female, 22 male) to 41 typically developing (TD) peers. Three dimensional gait analysis (VICON) was performed to obtain spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics and kinetics during barefoot, level walking at self-selected walking velocity. The sagittal plane support moment was analysed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). Three DS subgroups were identified based on differences in kinetic strategies characterised by the net internal knee joint moments and trunk lean. Kinematic and kinetic time profiles of the subgroups were compared to the TD group (SPM t-test). Clinical characteristics from physical examination and parental anamnesis were compared between DS (sub)groups using non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher's exact)., Results: Support moments in stance were significantly increased in the DS group compared to TD and strongly related to minimum knee flexion in midstance. Persistent internal knee extension moments during stance were detected in a subgroup of 27 % of the patients. A second subgroup of 34 % showed forward trunk lean and attained internal knee flexion moments. The remaining 39 % had neutral or backward trunk lean with internal knee flexion moments. Subgroups differed significantly in age and functional mobility., Significance: Inefficient kinetic patterns suggested that increased muscle effort was needed to control lower limb stability. Three distinct kinetic strategies that underly kinematic deviations were identified. Clinical evaluation of gait should pay attention to knee angles, trunk lean and support moments., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine (1) if Medial Thrust or Trunk Lean reduces the knee adduction moment (EKAM) the most during gait in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis, (2) if the best overall strategy is the most effective for each patient and (3) if these strategies affect ankle and hip kinetics., Design: Thirty patients with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis underwent 3-dimensional gait analysis. Participants received verbal instructions on two gait strategies (Trunk Lean and Medial Thrust) in randomized order after comfortable walking was recorded. The peaks and impulse of the EKAM and strategy-specific kinematic and kinetic variables were calculated for all conditions., Results: Early stance EKAM peak was significantly reduced during Medial Thrust (-29%). During Trunk Lean, early and late stance EKAM peak and EKAM impulse reduced significantly (38%, 21% and -25%, respectively). In 79% of the subjects, the Trunk Lean condition was significantly more effective in reducing EKAM peak than Medial Thrust. Peak ankle dorsi and plantar flexion, knee flexion and hip extension and adduction moments were not significantly increased., Conclusions: Medial Thrust and Trunk Lean reduced the EKAM during gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Individual selection of the most effective gait modification strategy seems vital to optimally reduce dynamic knee loading during gait. No detrimental effects on external ankle and hip moments or knee flexion moments were found for these conditions., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The gait modification strategies Trunk Lean and Medial Thrust have been shown to reduce the external knee adduction moment (EKAM) in patients with knee osteoarthritis which could contribute to reduced progression of the disease. Which strategy is most optimal differs between individuals, but the underlying mechanism that causes this remains unknown. Which gait parameters determine the optimal gait modification strategy for individual patients with knee osteoarthritis? Forty-seven participants with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis underwent 3-dimensional motion analysis during comfortable gait and with two gait modification strategies: Medial Thrust and Trunk Lean. Kinematic and kinetic variables were calculated. Participants were then categorized into one of the two subgroups, based on the modification strategy that reduced the EKAM the most for them. Multiple logistic regression analysis with backward elimination was used to investigate the predictive nature of dynamic parameters obtained during comfortable walking on the optimal modification gait strategy. For 68.1 % of the participants, Trunk Lean was the optimal strategy in reducing the EKAM. Baseline characteristics, kinematics and kinetics did not differ significantly between subgroups during comfortable walking. Changes to frontal trunk and tibia angles correlated significantly with EKAM reduction during the Trunk Lean and Medial Thrust strategies, respectively. Regression analysis showed that MT is likely optimal when the frontal tibia angle range of motion and peak knee flexion angle in early stance during comfortable walking are high (R2 Nagelkerke = 0.12). Our regression model based solely on kinematic parameters from comfortable walking contained characteristics of the frontal tibia angle and knee flexion angle. As the model explains only 12.3 % of variance, clinical application does not seem feasible. Direct assessment of kinetics seems to be the most optimal strategy for selecting the most optimal gait modification strategy for individual patients with knee osteoarthritis. • Self-selected Trunk Lean modification reduces the EKAM more than Medial Thrust. • The degree of frontal tibia angle modifications may determine the optimal strategy. • Parameters during comfortable walking only moderately predict the optimal strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]