Search

Background: Mobility limitations are common following stroke and frequently lead to poor participation in physical activity (PA)., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe PA across the various stages following stroke (acute, subacute, and chronic)., Data Sources: Searches were conducted in 5 databases., Study Selection: Eligible studies included participants with stroke whose PA was quantitatively measured for at least 4 hours in a single session. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts., Data Extraction: One reviewer extracted data and assessed quality using the Downs and Black checklist. Weighted means were calculated for PA outcomes., Data Synthesis: Searches yielded 103 eligible papers including 5306 participants aged 21 to 96 years. Devices (eg, activity monitors) were used in 73 papers, and behavioral mapping (observational monitoring) in 30. Devices show that people with stroke took on average 5535 steps per day (n = 406, 10 studies) in the subacute phase and 4078 steps (n = 1280, 32 studies) in the chronic phase. Average daily walking duration (% measured time) was higher in the chronic phase (9.0%, n = 100) than subacute (1.8%, n = 172), and sedentary time was >78% regardless of time post stroke. Acute data were lacking for these variables. Matched healthy individuals took an average of 8338 steps per day (n = 129). Behavioral mapping showed time in bed was higher in the acute than subacute phase (mean 45.1% versus 23.8%), with similar time spent sitting (mean 37.6% versus 32.6%)., Limitations: Limitations of this review include not pooling data reported as medians., Conclusions: Physical activity levels do not meet guidelines following stroke. Time spent inactive and sedentary is high at all times. Increasing PA and developing standardized activity targets may be important across all stages of stroke recovery., (© 2017 American Physical Therapy Association)

Gait training is a major focus of rehabilitation for many people with neurological disorders, yet systematic reviews have failed to identify the most effective form of gait training. The main objective of this study was to compare conditions for gait training for people with acquired brain injury (ABI). Seventeen people who had sustained an ABI and were unable to walk without assistance were recruited as a sample. Each participant was exposed to seven alternative gait training conditions in a randomized order. These were: (1) therapist manual facilitation; (2) the use of a gait-assistive device; (3) unsupported treadmill walking; and (4) four variations of body weight support treadmill training (BWSTT). Quantitative gait analysis was performed and Gait Profile Scores (GPS) were generated for each participant to determine which condition most closely resembled normal walking. BWSTT without additional therapist or self-support of the upper limbs was associated with more severe gait abnormality [Wilks' lambda = 0.20, F(6, 6) = 3.99, p = 0.047]. With the exception of therapist facilitation, the gait training conditions that achieved the closest approximation of normal walking required self-support of the upper limbs. When participants held on to a stable handrail, self-selected gait speeds were up to three times higher than the speeds obtained for over-ground walking [Wilks' lambda = 0.17, F(6, 7) = 5.85, p < 0.05]. The provision of stable upper-limb support was associated with high self-selected gait speeds that were not sustained when walking over ground. BWSTT protocols may need to prioritize reduction in self-support of the upper limbs, instead of increasing treadmill speed and reducing body weight support, in order to improve training outcomes.