Search

Objective: To explore the relationship between walking measurements (i.e., walking speed, walking performance and walking confidence), and participation in ambulatory people with chronic stroke., Materials and Methods: Participation was measured using the mobility domain of Brazilian version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. Walking measures were walking speed, assessed by 10-m Walk Test, walking performance, assessed by ABILOCO, walking confidence, assessed by mGES. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to explore the relationships between the walking measures and social participation, and step-wise multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify which walking measures would explain participation after stroke., Results: Ninety-five chronic stroke individuals (38 men), with a mean age of 67 (SD 13) years were assessed. Significant positive correlations, of high magnitude, were found between participation and all walking measures (r ≥ .53; p < .001). Regarding the regression analysis, walking confidence alone explained 44% (F = 72.4; p < .001) of the variance in participation. When perceived locomotion ability was included in the model, the explained variance increased to 48% (F = 42.8; p < .001)., Conclusion: All walking measures were correlated with social participation after stroke, but only perceived locomotion ability and walking confidence explained the variance in participation. Clinicians should be encouraged to evaluate real-life performance and personal factors that may limit community participation after stroke., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

To validate the telephone-based application of the modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) for the assessment of walking confidence in older people. Participants answered the mGES-Brazil on two randomized occasions, face-to-face and by telephone. The mean difference (MD) between the interviews was reported. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,1) was used to investigate the levels of agreement between the two occasions for total mGES-Brazil scores and for the individual items. A total of 78 individuals were included. There was no significant difference in the MD obtained between applications of the mGES (1 point, 95% confidence interval -6 to 7). A very high level of agreement was found between the mGES total scores during face-to-face and telephone applications (ICC = 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99). All items, except one (item 3), had a very high agreement between the two applications. The mGES showed to be reliable to be applied for telephone assessments of walking confidence in older people., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

To investigate the test–retest reliability and measurement error of the Brazilian version of the modified Gait Efficacy scale (mGES-Brazil) in individuals who have had stroke. The mGES-Brazil was applied on two occasions, five to seven days apart, in a research laboratory setting. Test–retest reliability and measurement error, which included the standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), and analysis of the limits of agreement by the Bland–Altman plots, were examined. Fifty individuals who have had stroke (18 men), with a mean age of 64 ± 11 years, were evaluated. All individual items showed good reliability (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient – ICC2,1 > 0.90). The ICC was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) and the Bland and Altman plots revealed no systematic changes in the mean test–retest scores. The SEM (SEM%) was 3 (5%), within the recommended values, while the SDC was 8 points. The mGES-Brazil demonstrated to be reliable to be applied within clinical and research contexts for the assessment of changes in walking confidence of individuals who have had stroke. Changes in mGES scores ≥8 points reflect real changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine whether using a cane would improve spatiotemporal parameters of walking, i.e., speed, stride length, cadence, and symmetry after stroke. Searches were conducted in eight databases. The experimental condition was walking with a cane. Four outcomes were of interest: walking speed, stride length, cadence, and symmetry. Twelve studies were included. Results from nine studies suggested that individuals with stroke walked 0.01 m/s (SD 0.06) slower with a single-point cane, compared with no cane. Two studies suggested a reduction in cadence (MD-5 steps/min, SD2) and an increase in stride length (MD 0.08 m, SD 0.01). Three studies suggested that individuals walked 0.06 m/s (SD 0.07) slower with a four-point cane, compared with no cane. Four studies suggested that individuals walked 0.06 m/s (SD 0.04) faster with a single- point cane compared with a four-point cane. Results regarding other outcomes were inconclusive. Results showed no worthwhile improvements in spatiotemporal parameters of walking with a single-point cane and a slight reduction with a four-point cane, compared with no cane. Individuals walked slightly faster with a single-point cane compared with a four-point cane, but the evidence is insufficient to support this superiority. A single-point cane may not improve spatiotemporal parameters of walking after stroke. Walking with a four-point cane may slightly decrease spatiotemporal parameters of walking. Canes may be prescribed without the fear of negatively impairing walking kinematics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Impairment and activity measures were significantly correlated with ability of locomotion. • Walking speed explained 35% of the variance in the ABILOCO scores. • Locomotion ability may increase if attention is focused on increasing walking speed. The identification of the predictors of locomotion ability could help professionals select variables to be considered during clinical evaluations and interventions. To investigate which impairment measures would best predict locomotion ability in people with chronic stroke. Individuals (n = 115) with a chronic stroke were assessed. Predictors were characteristics of the participants (i.e. age, sex, and time since stroke), motor impairments (i.e. muscle tonus, strength, and motor coordination), and activity limitation (i.e. walking speed). The outcome of interest was the ABILOCO scores, a self-reported questionnaire for the assessment of locomotion ability, designed specifically for individuals who have suffered a stroke. Age, sex, and time since stroke did not significantly correlate with the ABILOCO scores (−0.07 < ρ < 0.05; 0.48 < p < 0.99). Measures of motor impairments and walking speed were significantly correlated with the ABILOCO scores (−0.25 < r < 0.57; p < 0.001), but only walking speed and strength were kept in the regression model. Walking speed alone explained 35% (F = 55.5; p < 0.001) of the variance in self-reported locomotion ability. When strength was included in the model, the explained variance increased to 37% (F = 31.4; p < 0.001). Walking speed and lower limb strength best predicted locomotion ability as perceived by individuals who have suffered a stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]