Search

Sequencing of the gene encoding for von Willebrand factor (VWF) has brought new insight into the physiology of VWF as well as its pathophysiology in the context of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Molecular testing in VWD patients has shown high variability in the overall genetic background of this condition. Almost 600 mutations and many disease-causing mechanisms have been described in the 35 years since the VWF gene was identified. Genetic testing in VWD patients is now available in many centers as a part of the VWD diagnostic algorithm. Molecular mechanisms leading to types 2 and 3 VWD are well characterized; thus, information from genetic analysis in these VWD types may be beneficial for their correct classification. However, the molecular basis of type 1 VWD is still not fully elucidated and most likely represents a multifactorial disorder reflecting a combined impact of environmental and genetic factors within and outside of VWF . Regarding sequencing methods, the previous gold-standard Sanger sequencing is gradually being replaced with next-generation sequencing methods that are more cost- and time-effective. Instead of gene-by-gene approaches, gene panels of genes for coagulation factors and related proteins have recently become a center of attention in patients with inherited bleeding disorders, especially because a high proportion of VWD patients, mainly those with low VWF plasma levels (type 1), appear to be free of mutations in VWF. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) are accessible in a very limited number of laboratories. Results from these studies have presented several genes other than VWF or ABO possibly affecting VWF levels, and such findings will need further validation studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplastic plasma cell disorder characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow and presence of monoclonal protein in the blood or urine. Diverse hemostatic abnormalities have been reported in patients with myeloma which predispose the patient to bleeding and also thrombosis. The aim of this study was to measure the concentrations of serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, D-dimer, and von Willebrand factor in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed multiple myeloma before treatment, during therapy, and after successful therapy. The working hypothesis was that all of these factors reflect the total body burden of tumor. Angiogenic and coagulation activity should therefore decrease after successful therapy. Our study indicates that selected prothrombotic abnormalities occur in patients with MM, which may contribute to the increased risk of venous thromboembolism observed in these patients. The levels of our 3 parameters were strongly elevated in patient with newly diagnosed MM and also in patients with clinical stage III based on International Staging System criteria. Furthermore, there was a correlation between prognostic disease stages in all study population. It would be appropriate to include angiogenic and coagulation parameters into prognostic parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder. This disorder develops as a result of defects and/or deficiency of the plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). Laboratory testing for VWF-related disorders requires the assessment of both VWF level and VWF activity, the latter requiring multiple assays. As an additional step, an evaluation of VWF structural features by multimer analysis is useful in selective investigations. Multimer analysis is also important for the selection of a suitable VWF therapy preparation (desmopressin, VWF/FVIII concentrate, recombinant VWF) and the determination of the correct dose for the patient. Based on clinical and laboratory findings, including the analysis of VWF multimers, we classified our patients into individual types of VWD. Our study group included 58 patients. The study group consisted of 66% (38 patients) with VWD type 1, 5% (3 patients) with VWD type 2, 7% (4 patients) with VWD type 3, 5% (3 patients) with mixed type 1/2A VWD, and 17% (10 patients) comprising an unclassified group. In this article, we provide an overview of our practical experience using a new complementary method—the analysis of von Willebrand factor multimers with a semi-automatic analyzer Hydrasys 2 scan. We explain the principle, procedure, advantages, and pitfalls associated with the introduction of the VWF multimer analysis methodology into standard VWD diagnostics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]