Search

Perception of verticality can be assessed in two different ways: measuring of subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective haptic vertical (SHV). The evidence on aging of SVV and SVH is not conclusive and there is just little knowledge focused on this issue. The aim of this study was to compare accuracy of perception of SVV and SHV between groups of young and elderly healthy subjects. SVV examination was performed using the bucket test. An experimental tactile device was used to assess perceived SHV. Measurements of SVV and SHV were made in 27 young healthy and 30 elderly healthy subjects, both groups were right-handed due to self-report. SHV estimated position was significantly different (p< 0.01) in young and elderly (counterclockwise shift of 0.72 ± 3.70° and 3.51 ± 3.99°, respectively) and the SHV range (4.17 ± 5.40° and 9.64 ± 7.42°, respectively) was also different (p< 0.01). The differences were caused by significant difference in the supination maneuver (clockwise rod rotation, p< 0.001) which resulted in counterclockwise shift of 2.80 ± 4.90° and 8.33 ± 4.62° in young and elderly respectively. Pronation part of the SHV task (counterclockwise rod rotation) did not significantly differ between groups. SVV estimated position and range were not statistically different between young and elderly. These results provide evidence that the ability to detect SVV is not impaired, SHV seems also not to be affected by aging but there may be methodologic issues in SHV testing in elderly which should be controlled for in future studies. Results of both pronation and supination maneuvers should be provided along with SHV position. more...

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is characterized by a three-dimensional deviation of the vertebral column and its etiopathogenesis is unknown. Various factors are associated with idiopathic scoliosis, among these a prominent role has been attributed to integration of vestibular information with graviception for perception of space. Subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a sensitive sign of verticality perception. The aim of this study was to determine if SVV in adolescents with IS is different from healthy controls. Examination of SVV was performed using the bucket method. Binocular measurements of SVV were made in 23 adolescents with IS (age 14.5 ± 2.5, mean ± SD) and 23 healthy subjects (age 14.0 ± 2.9). The groups differed significantly on SVV deviation (p < 0.01): healthy controls (-0.04° ± 0.64°), IS group (0.86° ± 1.39°). There was also significant difference in SVV uncertainty (p< 0.001): healthy controls (1.50° ± 0.94°), IS group (2.46 ± 0.82°). We conclude that the perception of visual vertical is altered in IS which may play role in development of IS. more...

Purpose: The aim of the study is to capture the difference between the groups in direct relation to the type of electrode array insertion during cochlear implantation (CI). The robotic insertion is expected to be a more gently option. As recent studies have shown, there is a difference in perception of visual vertical (SVV) and postural control related to the CI. We assume that there can be differences in postural control and space perception outcomes depending on the type of the surgical method. Methods: In total, 37 (24 females, mean age ± SD was 42.9 ± 13.0) candidates for CI underwent an assessment. In 14 cases, the insertion of the electrode array was performed by a robotic system (RobOtol, Colin, France) and 23 were performed conventionally. In all of these patients, we performed the same examination before the surgery, the first day, and 3 weeks after the surgery. The protocol consists of static posturography and perception of visual vertical. Results: The both groups, RobOtol and conventional, responded to the procedure similarly despite the dissimilar electrode insertion. There was no difference between two groups in the dynamic of perception SVV and postural parameters. Patients in both groups were statistically significantly affected by the surgical procedure, SVV deviation appeared in the opposite direction from the implanted ear: 0.90° ± 1.25; − 1.67° ± 3.05 and − 0.19° ± 1.78 PRE and POST surgery (p < 0.001). And this deviation was spontaneously adjusted in FOLLOW-UP after 3 weeks (p < 0.01) in the both groups. We did not find a significant difference in postural parameters between the RobOtol and conventional group, even over time. Conclusion: Although the robotic system RobOtol allows a substantial reduction in the speed of insertion of the electrode array into the inner ear, our data did not demonstrate a postoperative effect on vestibular functions (SVV and posturography), which have the same character and dynamics as in the group with standard manual insertion. Registration number: The project is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05547113). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] more...

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation (CI) is associated with changes in the histopathology of the inner ear and impairment of vestibular function. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to evaluate patients for clinical manifestations of space perception and balance changes before surgery, compare them with asymptomatic subjects (controls), and report changes in posturography and subjective visual vertical (SVV) during the acute post-surgery period in patients. METHODS: Examination was performed using static posturography and the SVV measurement. We examined 46 control subjects and 39 CI patients. Patients were examined pre-surgery (Pre), 2nd day (D2) and then 14th day (D14) after implantation. RESULTS: Baseline SVV was not different between patients and control group. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in SVV between subgroups of right- and left-implanted patients at D2 (–1.36±3.02° and 2.71±2.36°, right and left side implanted respectively) but not Pre (0.76±1.07° and 0.31±1.82°) or D14 (0.72±1.83° and 1.29±1.60°). Baseline posturography parameters between patients and control group were statistically significantly different during stance on foam with eyes closed (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in posturography among Pre, D2 and D14. CONCLUSIONS: CI candidates have impaired postural control before surgery. CI surgery influences perception of subjective visual vertical in acute post-surgery period with SVV deviation contralateral to side of cochlear implantation, but not after two weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] more...