Search

The superior colliculus (SC) plays a critical role in mediating reflexive eye movements. Under optimal conditions, for example including a temporal 'gap' of 200 ms after fixation offset and prior to target onset, it is possible to isolate a population of 'express saccades' with very short latencies between 80 and 120 ms. Ablation of the SC abolishes express saccades in monkeys. However, it remains to be established whether express saccade generation is dependent upon visual afferents transmitting direct retinal projections to SC via the retinotectal tract (RTT). In nineteen healthy human participants, we used a gap paradigm to investigate whether express saccades demonstrate shorter latencies to targets in the temporal hemifield, a marker for RTT function. A population of predominantly reflexive saccades (with latencies between 70 and 150 ms) was isolated in which latencies toward temporal hemifield targets were shown to be shorter than toward nasal hemifield targets. The advantages for reflexive saccades toward temporal hemifield targets suggest that visual efferents from the retina to the superior colliculus contribute to generating reflexively triggered saccades., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Five patients with lesions involving intra-parietal cortex (IPCx) were tested in a rapid version of the double step paradigm to investigate the role of the IPCx in the rapid, online, updating of a saccade program. Saccades were executed to a single target in either the contra- or the ipsilesional visual field. In two thirds of the trials, a step change in target position required that the saccade shifted to a new location within the same field but in the contra- or the ipsilesional direction, allowing us to investigate whether patients are able to update their saccade program given new exogenous information about the required endpoint of the saccade. This set-up resulted in three types of initial saccades: saccades to the target on no-step trials, uncorrected saccades to the original target location on step trials and corrected saccades to the new target location on step trials. Furthermore, if the updating of the original eye movement program failed, patients performed a second saccade to the new target location that required a rapid error correction. The analysis of the double-step task on a group level indicated that latencies for all trial types were longer when saccades were directed to the contralesional versus the ipsilesional field. Furthermore, longer latencies were required for patients to initiate a corrective second saccade after making an uncorrected first saccade in their contralesional compared to ipsilesional field. There were no differences in the ultimate landing positions of the eye movements for such corrected saccades. These results reveal that deficits in updating of saccade programs only seem to be present if the updating must occur after the gaze has shifted to a new location, pointing to a role of intra-parietal cortex in the processes involved in updating information when the current reference frame has to be updated. In conclusion, the paradigm deployed in the current study allows for a refinement of the role of the intra-parietal cortex in the updating of saccade programs., (© 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Monocular viewing conditions show an asymmetry between stimuli presented in the temporal and nasal visual fields in their efficiency for automatically triggering eye saccades and grasping attention. For instance, observers free to make a saccade to one of two stimuli presented together orient preferentially to the temporal stimulus. Such naso-temporal asymmetry (NTA) has been assumed to reflect the asymmetry in the retinotectal pathway to the superior colliculus. We tested this hypothesis using S cone stimuli, which are invisible to the magnocellular and retinotectal pathways. The observed NTA in choice saccades to bilateral stimuli was no less present for S cone stimuli than for luminance stimuli. Additionally, the amplitude of the NTA can be enhanced when S cone signals are added to luminance signals. These results suggest that behavioral NTA in humans is not diagnostic of retinotectal mediation. Furthermore, we found no asymmetries in latency, suggesting that the NTA in saccade choice does not originate simply from a bottom-up asymmetry in any low level visual pathways.

Some patients with hemianopia due to striate cortex lesions show above chance ability in reporting visual stimuli presented in the blind visual field, a phenomenon commonly known as blindsight. Here we report a patient with a dense right hemianopia whose blindsight shows a temporal/nasal asymmetry. MP was tested in a two-alternative forced-choice localisation task, with either the right eye or the left eye patched in separate blocks. When targets appeared in the contralesional temporal hemifield, MP's localisation performance was extremely accurate, whilst she performed at chance with targets in the contralesional nasal hemifield. This is the first demonstration of a temporal/nasal asymmetry for blindsight in a forced-choice paradigm, and is consistent with blindsight in MP's hemianopic field being mediated by a subcortical, extrageniculate route.

In all vertebrates, visual signals from each visual field project to the opposite midbrain tectum (called the superior colliculus in mammals). The tectum/colliculus computes visual salience to select targets for context-contingent visually guided behavior: a frog will orient toward a small, moving stimulus (insect prey) but away from a large, looming stimulus (a predator). In mammals, visual signals competing for behavioral salience are also transmitted to the visual cortex, where they are integrated with collicular signals and then projected via the dorsal visual stream to the parietal and frontal cortices. To control visually guided behavior, visual signals must be encoded in body-centered (egocentric) coordinates, and so visual signals must be integrated with information encoding eye position in the orbit—where the individual is looking. Eye position information is derived from copies of eye movement signals transmitted from the colliculus to the frontal and parietal cortices. In the intraparietal cortex of the dorsal stream, eye movement signals from the colliculus are used to predict the sensory consequences of action. These eye position signals are integrated with retinotopic visual signals to generate scaffolding for a visual scene that contains goal-relevant objects that are seen to have spatial relationships with each other and with the observer. Patients with degeneration of the superior colliculus, although they can see, behave as though they are blind. Bilateral damage to the intraparietal cortex of the dorsal stream causes the visual scene to disappear, leaving awareness of only one object that is lost in space. This tutorial considers what we have learned from patients with damage to the colliculus, or to the intraparietal cortex, about how the phylogenetically older midbrain and the newer mammalian dorsal cortical visual stream jointly coordinate the experience of a spatially and temporally coherent visual scene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Probabilistic diffusion tractography was used to provide the first direct evidence for a subcortical pathway from the retina to the amygdala, via the superior colliculus and pulvinar, that transmits visual stimuli signaling threat. A bias to orient toward threat was measured in a temporal order judgement saccade decision task, under monocular viewing, in a group of 19 healthy participants who also underwent diffusion weighted MR imaging. On each trial of the behavioural task a picture depicting threat was presented in one visual field and a competing non-threatening stimulus in the other. The onset interval between the two pictures was randomly varied and participants made a saccade toward the stimulus that they judged to have appeared first. The bias to orient toward threat was stronger when the threatening stimulus was in the temporal visual hemifield, suggesting that afferents via the retinotectal tract contributed to the bias. Probabalistic tractography was used to virtually dissect connections between the superior colliculus and the amygdala traversing the pulvinar. Individual differences in microstructure (fractional anisotropy) of the streamline predicted the magnitude of the bias to orient toward threat, providing supporting evidence for a functional role of the subcortical SC-amygdala pathway in processing threat in healthy humans. • First direct evidence for subcortical pathway transmitting visual threat. • Orienting is biased to threatening compared to pleasant stimuli. • Bias to threat is greater in the temporal visual hemifield. • Microstructure (FA) of SC-Amygdala pathway predicts threat bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parietal cortex has been implicated in the updating, after eye movements, of a salience map that is required for coherent visual experience and for the control of visually guided behavior. The current experiment investigated whether TMS over anterior intraparietal cortex (AIPCx), just after a saccade, would affect the ability to update and maintain a salience map. In order to generate a salience map, we employed a paradigm in which an uninformative cue was presented at one object in a display to generate inhibition of return (IOR)-an inhibitory tag that renders the cued object less salient than others in the display, and that slows subsequent responses to visual transients at its location. Following the cue, participants made a saccade to either left or right, and we then probed for updating of the location of IOR by measuring manual reaction time to targets appearing at cued location of the cued compared to an uncued object. Between the time of saccade initiation and target appearance, dual-pulse TMS was targeted over right (Experiment 1) or left AIPCx (Experiment 2), and a vertex control side. Updating of the location of IOR was eliminated by TMS over right, but not the left, AIPCx, suggesting that right parietal cortex is involved in the remapping of IOR. Remapping was eliminated by right AIPCx, regardless of whether the saccade was made to the left (contralateral), or right (ipsilateral) visual field, and regardless of which field the target appeared in. We conclude that right AIPCx is the neural substrate for maintaining a salience map across saccades, and not simply for propagating an efference copy of saccade commands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: It has been proposed that the mental representation of a graspable object involves not only a description of its visual properties but also encodings of the motor programs to act upon it []. Thus, observing a handle automatically primes the motor programs responsible for reaching and grasping it. Here, we provide neurological evidence that such action-related object features can bias visual selection. Two patients with visual extinction after right-parietal injury detected cups with left- or right-oriented handles, briefly displayed in either or both visual fields. People with this disorder have deficient awareness for stimuli toward the contralesional, left side of space, especially when competing stimuli appear further to the right []. This contralesional extinction was significantly reduced when cups had handles affording a left-hand grasp, even though no hand response was required. No effect was found when handles were replaced with patches equated for position, size, and mean luminance. These data suggest that action-related information may be correctly extracted by the visual system, even though they are unavailable for conscious report. It is proposed that an object affordance for grasping modulates attentional selection by activating specific motor schema that, in turn, enhance the competitive strength of that object representation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The effects of damage to the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus in humans on reflexive orienting and selective attention were investigated. In a spatial orienting task three patients with unilateral pulvinar damage determined the location of a visual target that followed a cue that was not informative as to the targets location. Contralesional targets were responded to more slowly than ipsilesional targets. Also, at long cue target intervals patients responses to contralesional targets that appeared at previously cued locations were slower than to non-cued locations indicating that pulvinar damage does not affect inhibition of return. In the selective attention task two of the patients identified a target that appeared at one level of a global-local hierarchical stimulus while ignoring a distractor present at the other level. The distractor indicated either the same response as the target or a different response. Response times to targets in both visual fields were similar as were interference effects from the ignored distractors. These data indicate that engaging attention contralesionally is not impaired in discrimination tasks and that filtering of irrelevant information was not impaired contralesionally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study on the reach target selection deficits in hand-reaching movements during the temporary localized inactivation of the midbrain's superior colliculus (SC). It states that rhesus monkeys could perceive the target even at the inactivated part of the visual field. It says that results indicate that SC is a part of target selection system affecting the choice of targets for other acts such as hand-reaching.

We report a patient with unilateral damage to the rostral part of the pulvinar who was impaired in localizing stimuli in the inferior visual field contralateral to the lesion and who made errors in the binding of shape and color in that quadrant. The findings demonstrate the importance of the pulvinar in spatial coding and provide support for the function of the thalamus in binding of features. They also provide evidence for a homology between the visual field maps of the inferior and lateral subdivisions of the pulvinar in monkeys and in humans, such that the inferior visual field is represented in the rostral part of the nucleus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Six patients with a lesion to the frontal oculomotor cortex performed a double stimulus paradigm. [•] Latencies to the contralesional visual field were longer when a task instruction was given. [•] This effect was strongest when strong oculomotor inhibition was applied. [•] FEF lesions result in a slowing of the inhibitory signals associated with the rejection of a distractor. [•] These results reveal the important role of the FEF in the voluntary control of eye movements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]