Search

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of the yellow sub-threshold micropulse laser (YSML) in eyes with uveitic macula edema (UME)., Methods: A prospective interventional study. Eyes with non-infectious UME and an unsatisfactory response to prior conventional treatments underwent navigated YSML (NAVILAS ® ). The treatment was planned on an imported macular OCT scan. The central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded immediately before the treatment (baseline) and again after 1 and 3 months. The end of the follow up (FU) was the last available evaluation in the case of no UME recurrence; or when the CMT increase required rescue therapy., Results: Eight eyes of as many patients were included. The mean duration of the FU was 252 days (range: 170-398 days). No adverse events were observed. In the whole cohort the mean values improvement over time was significant for both CMT ( p  = 0.011) and BCVA ( p  < 0.001). The indication for a new treatment was stated in 4 eyes (50%) after a mean FU of 277 ± 43 days. This time was statistically comparable with the mean FU of eyes without UME recurrence. At the baseline the non-UME recurrence eyes had a significantly lower mean CMT (326 ± 80 vs 485 ± 112 μm, p  = 0.03)., Conclusions: The application of YSLM for UME has not previously been mentioned in literature. Our results were promising in terms of both safety and efficacy. This would authorize further studies on the procedure, also as a first line treatment in naif UME cases., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: To compare the clinical and aberrometric outcomes obtained with a new diffractive pentafocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a diffractive trifocal IOL., Methods: Patients bilaterally implanted with the pentafocal Intensity SeeLens IOL (Hanita Lenses) (n = 30) and the trifocal FineVision POD F IOL (PhysIOL) (n = 30) during cataract surgery were studied after 1 month for refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, Hartmann-Shack aberration, and double-pass aberration. The Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire was used to evaluate visual comfort., Results: Distance and near visual acuities were similar with the two IOLs, but distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity was better with the Intensity IOLs (0.03 ± 0.04 vs 0.11 ± 0.04 logMAR in the FineVision eyes, P < .01). The difference between objective and subjective refraction was more myopic for the Intensity IOL (-1.15 vs -0.29 diopters [D]). The defocus curve was flatter with the Intensity IOL. Contrast sensitivity was similar in both IOLs. Hartmann-Shack aberration and double-pass aberration were similar, but the modulation transfer function cut-off value was worse with the Intensity IOL: 11.6 ± 2.7 vs 15.3 ± 4.9 ( P < .01). QoV scores were better with the Intensity IOL, in particular for glare, halos, and starburst., Conclusions: In this comparative series, the pentafocal Intensity IOL provided better intermediate vision and better defocus curve than the FineVision IOL, with comparable distance and near vision. The optical disturbances as reported by the patients were higher with the FineVision IOL. Additional studies will better define the aberration profile obtained with the pentafocal IOL. [ J Refract Surg . 2024;40(9):e604-e613.] .