Search

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of intravitreal Aflibercept (IVA) versus dexamethasone (DEX) implant for treating recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME) in pseudophakic eyes at 1-year follow-up., Design: Retrospective comparative case series., Participants: Data of all patients diagnosed with DME between January 2019 and December 2021, who underwent 4-monthly doses of intravitreal ranibizumab but had persistent DME [central macular thickness (CMT) within 10% of baseline value] were extracted from a computerized database. Of these, only pseudophakic eyes that underwent either IVA or DEX implant and had at least 1-year follow-up were included for analysis., Methods: DEX implant was preferred before December 2020 and IVA after this time point. In the IVA group, patients were followed up every month while DEX were followed at least every 3 months. Reinjections were considered when vision dropped by at least 1 Snellen's line or CMT increased by at least 10% from the previous visit in both groups., Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of change in vision and CMT at 1-year follow-up in DEX versus IVA groups., Results: Eighty-four eyes of 84 patients aged 54.4 + 4.4 years were included, 39 (46%) received DEX and 45 (54%) received IVA. Groups were comparable for baseline vision and CMT. Vision improved equally in both groups from 0.83 + 0.15 logMAR to 0.52 + 0.10 logMAR at 3 months ( P < 0.01) and then stabilized till 1 year. However, eyes in the IVA group were 6.5 times more likely (Odds ratio = 6.45, 95% CI = 1.3 - 31.9) to achieve >3-line improvement in vision. The CMT reduction was also comparable between groups (-169 + 51 in DEX vs. -174 + 49 in IVA, P = 0.67). More eyes in the IVA group required >3 injections (91% vs. 69% in DEX, P = 0.01). The IOP was significantly higher at 6 and 9 months in the DEX group and 5 eyes (13%) required IOP lowering medications., Conclusion: In pseudophakic eyes with recalcitrant DME not responding to ranibizumab, switching to IVA or DEX implant results in equal visual improvement and CMT reduction. Though >3-line improvement occurs more frequently with IVA, this comes at the expense of a greater number of injections and follow-up visits., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.)

Purpose: This study investigates the efficacy of transitioning patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) from aflibercept (T1) to biosimilar ranibizumab (T2), an approach not previously documented in literature. Methods: In this multicenter observational study, patients over 50 years of age with nAMD were shifted from intravitreal aflibercept (IVI AFL) to biosimilar ranibizumab (B-RBZ) due to financial constraints. This study employed standardized ophthalmological methods to assess visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), and subretinal and intraretinal fluid. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and linear regression. Results: A total of 29 eyes (12 males and 17 females) were analyzed. Mean age was 72.55 ± 6.43 years. VA improved significantly during T1, with a mean increase from 55.0 ± 10.2 to 70.0 ± 8.5 ETDRS letters at the switch time point (p < 0.01), then a slight decrease to 62.3 ± 8.9 at 12 months (p < 0.05) was noted during T2. The mean CMT decreased notably from 400 ± 50 to 290 ± 45 μm at the switch. The final CMT at 12 months after switching to B-RBZ was 280 ± 40 μm (p < 0.01). There was a significant decrease in the retinal and intra retinal fluid during T1, followed by a gradual increase during T2. A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was noted between the presence of intraretinal fluid and increased injection frequency of B-RBZ. Conclusion: The switch from IVI AFL to IVI B-RBZ in patients with nAMD demonstrated efficacy in maintaining the VA and macular anatomy, with some challenges in fluid management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyse outcomes of innovator ranibizumab (IRM) (Lucentis) and biosimilar ranibizumab (BRM) (Razumab) in Indian eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: Retrospective observational study in nAMD patients, who were treated with IRM or BRM (3 loading doses followed by pro re nata (PRN). Primary outcome measures were change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) along with safety analysis. Secondary outcomes measures were changes in the subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF). Results: Inclusion criteria were satisfied in 164 eyes (60.74%). A total of 87 eyes were treated with IRM, and 77 eyes received BRM. Baseline BCVA was 0.57± 0.27 logMAR in IRM group and 0.61± 0.25 in the BRM group. At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months BCVA was 0.27± 0.22 (p< 0.0001), 0.34± 0.23 (p< 0.0001), 0.39± 0.25 (p< 0.0001), and 12 months 0.41± 0.23 (p< 0.0001) in the IRM group and 0.24± 0.16 (p< 0.0001), 0.27± 0.16 (p< 0.0001), 0.34± 0.17 (p< 0.0001), 0.38± 0.18 (p< 0.0001) in the BRM group. Baseline CMT was 420.39± 54.45 μm in IRM group and 407.82± 53.07 μm in BRM group. At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, CMT decreased to 258.28± 20.4 μm (p< 0.0001), 268.38± 19.5 μm (p< 0.0001), 269.51± 32.41 μm (p< 0.0001), and 278.28± 16.56 μm (p< 0.0001) in the IRM group and 258.84± 17.47 μm (p< 0.0001), 265.69± 17.29 μm (p< 0.0001), 273.64± 23.13 μm (p< 0.0001), and 283.09± 19.66 μm (p< 0.0001) in the BRM group. Similar improvements in IRF and SRF levels in the patients were noted in both groups. Required number of doses of IRM and BRM was similar over the 12 month period in both groups. A similar profile of adverse events was noted in both the groups. Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of IRM and BRM show similar efficacy and safety in Indian eyes with nAMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report the 52-week real-world efficacy and safety outcomes of brolucizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Indian eyes. Patients and Methods: A retrospective, multicentre chart analysis of 82 eyes of 82 patients with nAMD (switch therapy: 65 eyes; treatment-naïve: 17 eyes) with 52-week follow-up data was performed. Pro-re-nata re-treatment was offered based on visual and tomographic criteria. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), central-subfield thickness (CST), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were the key outcome measures, coupled with the safety profile. Results: The mean age of the study population was 67.65 (± 10.67) years, with 57 male patients (69.5%). The study's mean number of injections was 4.8 (± 0.77). After brolucizumab therapy, the BCVA improved significantly at weeks 4 (P< 0.001), and maintained up to week 52 (P< 0.001). The CST also reduced significantly at all the visits (Baseline: 413.6 ± 64.6 μm; 52-week: 292.37 ± 13.5 μm; P< 0.001). Significantly fewer eyes demonstrated residual SRF (P< 0.001) and IRF (P< 0.001) at all visits, starting with week 12 and continuing until week 52. The PED resolution was significant from week 24 through week 52 (P=0.004). Each of the 82 eyes received four injections of brolucizumab, with 63.4% (52 eyes) receiving a fifth dose and only 17.1% requiring a sixth. Mild intraocular inflammation (IOI) was seen in three eyes (3.66%) that resolved conservatively. One patient (1.2%) developed mild fever that subsided with oral medications. Conclusion: The 52-week BRAILLE study demonstrates that brolucizumab is effective and safe in nAMD eyes in a real-world setting. Brolucizumab treatment can reduce the therapeutic burden in patients with nAMD due to its rapid, sustained efficacy and favourable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To compare the efficacy of innovator ranibizumab (iRBZ—Accentrix, Novartis, India) vs. biosimilar ranibizumab (bRBZ, Razumab-Intas, India) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in an Indian population. Methods: Data of patients with DME who underwent at least three injections of iRBZ or bRBZ and had a minimum of 6 months follow-up were obtained from an electronic database. Choice of injection depended upon the patient. Pro re nata (PRN) protocol from baseline was used with reinjections advised if the central macular thickness (CMT) was at least 300 μm and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/40 or worse. Primary outcome measure was comparison of change in BCVA at 6 months between iRBZ and bRBZ. Results: We included 264 eyes in the iRBZ group and 69 eyes in bRBZ group, which were comparable for baseline characteristics. Mean BCVA improved from 0.64 ± 0.39 logMAR to 0.47 ± 0.31 logMAR (p < 0.001) in the iRBZ group and from 0.71 ± 0.42 logMAR to 0.50 ± 0.29 logMAR in the bRBZ group (p < 0.001) at 6 months. There were no differences in BCVA between the two groups (p > 0.05 for all time points). The CMT reduction in the iRBZ group (120 ± 196 µm) was comparable to that in the bRBZ group at 6 months (105 ± 187 µm) (p = 0.69). There was no difference in the mean number of injections taken (3.81 ± 1.2 in iRBZ vs. 3.55 ± 1.2 in bRBZ) (p > 0.05) between groups. Vision at baseline was the only factor associated with vision at last follow-up after adjusting for CMT at baseline, type of injection, and number of injections. Conclusions: Biosimilar RBZ is similar to innovator RBZ in improving vision and reducing CMT in eyes with DME in the short term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To study the outcomes of submacular blood removal with isolated autologous full-thickness retinal pigment epithelial (RPE)-choroid patch graft transplantation in long-standing large-sized submacular hematomas in Indian population.Methods: A retrospective study was done on eight consecutive patients of long-standing large-sized submacular hematoma from east India. In all cases, 23G vitrectomy was performed with the induction of retinal detachment (performed with or without 38G or 41G subretinal cannula) and a temporal 180° retinectomy was done. Submacular blood along with choroidal neovascular tissue was removed. A full-thickness RPE-choroid autologous patch graft was taken from a relatively healthy quadrant at the mid periphery and then the graft transferred under perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) to place it in the subfoveal area. Then, retina was re-attached using PFCL and laser completed. Silicone oil (5000 cst) was used as a tamponade. Post-operatively, wide-field fundus photographs (Optos), serial optical coherence tomography (OCT), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), and multifocal electroretinography (ERG) were done.Results: The mean age of the patients at presentation was 67.88 ± 10.03 years. Mean pre-operative best corrected visual acquity (BCVA) was 2.64 ± 0.3 log MAR and mean postoperative BCVA was 1.095 ± 0.27 log MAR (P < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 20 ± 16.57 months. ICG showed re-vascularization of translocated graft in all at 2 months. Multifocal ERG (after 6 months) showed some waveform in all. None of the cases developed re-bleed.Conclusion: Removal of submacular blood and neovascular membrane with autologous RPE-choroid graft is a viable option in cases with long-standing large submacular hematomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]