Search

The removal of viruses by filtration is a critical unit operation to ensure the overall safety of monoclonal antibody (mAb) products. Many mAbs show very low filtrate flux during virus removal filtration, although there are still significant uncertainties regarding both the mechanisms and antibody properties that determine the filtration behavior. Experiments were performed with three highly purified mAbs through three different commercial virus filters (Viresolve Pro, Viresolve NFP, and Pegasus SV4) with different pore structures and chemistries. The flux decline observed during mAb filtration was largely reversible, even under conditions where the filtrate flux with the mAb was more than 100-fold smaller than the corresponding buffer flux. The extent of flux decline was highly correlated with the hydrodynamic diameter of the mAb as determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The mAb with the lowest filtrate flux for all three membranes showed the largest attractive intermolecular interactions and the greatest hydrophobicity, with the latter determined by binding to a butyl resin in an analytical hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) column. These results strongly suggest that the flux behavior is dominated by reversible self-association of the mAbs, providing important insights into the design of more effective virus filtration processes and in the early identification of problematic mAbs/solution conditions., (© 2023 The Authors. Biotechnology Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Virus removal filtration is a critical step in the manufacture of monoclonal antibody products, providing a robust size-based removal of both enveloped and non-enveloped viruses. Many monoclonal antibodies show very large reductions in filtrate flux during virus filtration, with the mechanisms governing this behavior and its dependence on the properties of the virus filter and antibody remaining largely unknown. Experiments were performed using the highly asymmetric Viresolve® Pro and the relatively homogeneous Pegasus™ SV4 virus filters using a highly purified monoclonal antibody. The filtrate flux for a 4 g/L antibody solution through the Viresolve® Pro decreased by about 10-fold when the filter was oriented with the skin side down but by more than 1000-fold when the asymmetric filter orientation was reversed and used with the skin side up. The very large flux decline observed with the skin side up could be eliminated by placing a large pore size prefilter directly on top of the virus filter; this improvement in filtrate flux was not seen when the prefilter was used inline or as a batch prefiltration step. The increase in flux due to the prefilter was not related to the removal of large protein aggregates or to an alteration in the extent of concentration polarization. Instead, the prefilter appears to transiently disrupt reversible associations of the antibodies caused by strong intermolecular attractions. These results provide important insights into the role of membrane morphology and antibody properties on the filtrate flux during virus filtration., (© 2022 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.)

Background: Virus inactivation is a critical operation in therapeutic protein manufacturing. Low pH buffers are a widely used strategy to ensure robust enveloped virus clearance. However, the choice of model virus can give varying results in viral clearance studies. Pseudorabies virus (SuHV) or herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) are frequently chosen as model viruses to demonstrate the inactivation for the herpes family., Results: In this study, SuHV, HSV-1, and equine arteritis virus (EAV) were used to compare the inactivation susceptibility at pH 4.0 and 4°C. SuHV and HSV-1 are from the same family, and EAV was chosen as a small, enveloped virus. Glycine, acetate, and citrate buffers at pH 4.0 and varying buffer strengths were studied. The inactivation susceptibility was found to be in the order of SuHV > HSV > EAV. The buffer effectiveness was found to be in the order of citrate > acetate > glycine. The smaller virus, EAV, remained stable and infectious in all the buffer types and compositions studied., Conclusion: The variation in inactivation susceptibility of herpes viruses indicated that SuHV and HSV cannot be interchangeably used as a virus model for inactivation studies. Smaller viruses might remain adventitiously infective at moderately low pH., (© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Viral surrogates to screen for virus inactivation (VI) can be a faster, cheaper and safer alternative to third-party testing of pathogenic BSL2 (Biosafety level 2) model viruses. Although the bacteriophage surrogate, Ø6, has been used to assess low pH BSL2 VI, it has not been used for evaluation of detergent-mediated VI. Furthermore, Ø6 is typically assayed through host cell infectivity which introduces the risk of cross-contaminating other cell lines in the facility. To circumvent contamination, we developed an in-house RT-qPCR (Reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction) assay for selective detection of active Ø6 from a population of live and dead phage. The RT-qPCR assay was used to evaluate Ø6 inactivation in cell culture fluid of monoclonal antibody and fusion protein. Complementary Ø6 infectivity was also conducted at a third-party testing facility. The Ø6 RT-qPCR and infectivity data was modeled against VI of three BSL2 viruses, X- MuLV, A- MuLV and HSV-1 in corresponding therapeutics. Both Ø6 methods demonstrate that any VI agent showing Ø6 clearance of a minimum of 2.5 logs would demonstrate complete BSL2 VI of ≥ 4.0 logs. Compared to BSL2 virus testing, this in-house Ø6 RT-qPCR tool can screen VI agents at 5% the cost and a turnaround time of 2 to 3 days vs. 4 to 7 months., (© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background: Therapeutic protein manufacturing would benefit by having an arsenal of ways to inactivate viruses. There have been many publications on the virus inactivation ability of arginine at pH 4.0, but the mechanism of this inactivation is unknown. This study explored how virus structure and solution conditions enhance virus inactivation by arginine and leads to a better understanding of the mechanism of virus inactivation by arginine., Results: Large diameter viruses from the Herpesviridae family (SuHV-1, HSV-1) with loosely packed lipids were highly inactivated by arginine, whereas small diameter, enveloped viruses (equine arteritis virus (EAV) and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV)) with tightly packed lipids were negligibly inactivated by arginine. To increase the inactivation of viruses resistant to arginine, arginine-derivatives and arginine peptides were tested. Derivates and peptides demonstrated that a greater capacity for clustering and added hydrophobicity enhanced virus inactivation. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) detected increases in virus size after arginine exposure, supporting the mechanism of lipid expansion., Conclusions: Arginine most likely interacts with the lipid membrane to cause inactivation. This is shown by larger viruses being more sensitive to inactivation and expansion of the viral size. The enhancement of arginine inactivation when increased hydrophobic molecules are present or arginine is clustered demonstrates a potential mechanism of how arginine interacts with the lipid membrane., (© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)