Search

Summary. Knowing the likely distribution of intervals from hepatitis C infection to first RNA-negativity is important in deciding about therapeutic intervention. Prospectively collected sera and data from the Transfusion-transmitted Viruses Study (1974–1980) provide specific dates of infection and pattern of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations. We examined frequency, timing and correlates of spontaneous resolution for 94 acutely infected transfusion recipients followed for a median of 9.5 months. Later, follow-up sera (>10 years) were available for 27 of the 94 cases from a Veterans Administration (VA) Study (1989–1990). Twenty-five (27%) of the 94 cases were classified as probably resolved during the episode itself. First RNA negativity occurred at 6–50 weeks (median, 19.5 weeks) after infection, and 5–43 weeks (median, 11 weeks) after ALT elevation. Thirteen of the 25 cases remained RNA-negative subsequently; 12 others had 1–6 RNA-positive sera intercalated between first and last RNA-negative results. RNA negativity, therefore, began variably and was interrupted in 12 cases of 25 (48%) by transient RNA-positive sera. Five of these 25 patients who were RNA-negative in the last study specimen had late, Veterans Administration Study follow-up; none showed viraemia. Of the remaining 69 transfusion transmitted virus study recipients, whose last serum was RNA-positive, two cleared viraemia after the last study serum but before late follow-up. Eleven (16%) had 23 intercalated RNA-negative sera before last positivity. RNA status, therefore, needs monitoring for many months before judging the spontaneous outcome as transient negativity may occur. Resolution was significantly more common in women and symptomatic cases; it was not associated with viral load in the infectious donation, HCV genotype, or the recipient’s age.

Background Conformational viral proteins potentially play an important role in the immunobiology of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and may enable earlier antibody detection. Materials and Methods HCV RNA was detected using nucleic acid testing. Early antibody production was evaluated using three enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) containing antigenic proteins not present in licensed EIAs. Respectively, these contained: 1 multiple-epitope fusion antigen (MEFA) 7·1-NS3/4a, 2 F and Core, and 3 E1/E2 proteins. NS3/4a is a conformational antigen retaining protease and helicase enzymatic activities. MEFA 7·1 contains the linear epitopes used in licenced EIAs, including the latest EIA-3·0, in combination with genotype 1–3 specific epitopes. Forty-two RNA positive, EIA-3·0 negative samples, including two persistently serosilent cases, were used to evaluate these research EIAs. As controls, 54 EIA-3·0 negative/RNA negative and three HCV RNA+/antibody positive specimens were included. Results Only the MEFA 7·1-NS3/4a EIA was positive in seven (17%) of the 42 HCV RNA + specimens, in all three EIA-3·0 positive controls but in none of 54 EIA-3·0 negative/HCV RNA negative controls. Notably, six of the seven (86%) specimens had evidence of active hepatitis (ALT > 210 IU/l). The two serosilent cases were research EIA negative. Conclusion A novel EIA with conformational and linear epitopes detected HCV antibodies in 17% of viraemic specimens missed by the standard reference EIA-3·0. Our research EIA appears to detect HCV antibodies closer to the initiation of acute hepatitis. Given that the average RNA-positive, antibody-negative window period is ∼56·4 days, this 17% yield would translate into a ∼10-day earlier detection of antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-transmitted West Nile virus (WNV) infections were first reported in 2002, which led to rapid development of investigational nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT). A study was conducted to evaluate sensitivities of WNV screening and supplemental NAT assays first employed in 2003. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five member-coded panels were distributed to NAT assay manufacturers. Panels included five pedigreed WNV standards (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 copies/mL), 15 or 16 donor units with very-low-level viremia identified through 2003 screening, and four or five negative control samples. Samples were tested neat in 10 replicates by all assays; for NAT screening assays, 10 replicates were also performed on dilutions consistent with minipool (MP)-NAT. The viral load distribution for 142 MP-NAT yield donations was characterized, relative to the analytical sensitivity of MP-NAT systems. RESULTS: Analytical sensitivities (50% limits of detection [LoD] based on Poisson model of detection of WNV standards) for screening NAT assays ranged from 3.4 to 29 copies per mL; when diluted consistent with MP pool sizes, the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays was reduced to 43 to 309 copies per mL. Analytical sensitivity of supplemental assays ranged from 1.5 to 7.7 copies per mL (50% LoD). Detection of RNA in donor units varied consistent with analytical LoD of assays. Detection of low-level viremia after MP dilutions was particularly compromised for seropositive units, probably reflecting lower viral loads in the postseroconversion phase. Based on the viral load distribution of MP-NAT yield donations (median, 3519 copies/mL; range

Since 1980, the Transfusion-transmitted Viruses Study (TTVS) (1974-1980) has continued to maintain its computerized database and stored sera to enable ongoing study of new transfusion events since the 1970s. Most recently, we have used this resource to study parameters of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among 94 donor-recipient pairs in which there was transmission. In addition, frequent recipient observations permitted further characterization of the early phase of the infection's course. Donor RNA load ranged from 3.7 to 3,160,000 IU/mL. Onset of recipient viremia was judged from a total of 67 sera collected during the 4th through 8th days posttransfusion; only 2 of the 67 sera were still RNA nonreactive by that time. The recipients' latent periods to an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation of > or =90 IU/L ranged from 6 to 112 days (median, 46 days) and was shorter with higher donor RNA levels. Descriptors of the recipient's illness showed several strongly positive and negative correlations. The latent period tended to be shorter in the 37% of cases that were clinically overt. Attributes of donors with genotypes 1 and non-1 and subtypes 1a and 1b did not differ significantly. Recipients with genotype 1 strains had shorter latent intervals than non-1 strains. On multivariate analysis, latent period was significantly associated (negatively) only with the highest ALT level during the first 120 days of follow-up (P = .014). In conclusion, host factors are more important determinants of acute HCV infection dynamics than virus-associated factors.

Recent clinical studies suggest that hepatitis B virus (HBV) load and genotype may be independent predictors of responses to antiviral therapies. However, it is difficult for clinicians to accurately determine viral loads in patient samples because results—both the values and the units of measure—can vary greatly among different tests. Accordingly, the World Health Organization (WHO) has produced the first international standard for HBV DNA for nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays. In the present study, we describe the performance of the target-capture PCR HBV DNA quantitative assay for the quantitation of HBV DNA in clinical samples and reference panels. The range of quantitation was between 50 and 10 10 IU/ml. The sensitivity and accuracy of the target-capture PCR assay were demonstrated by using the HBV panel from Quality Control for Medical Diagnostics (QCMD) and the WHO HBV DNA standard. The target-capture PCR assay quantitated the six genotype A members of the QCMD panel and dilutions of the WHO HBV DNA standard within an accuracy of 74 to 142%. Compared to current serological methods, the assay offers window period reductions of 19 days prior to HBV surface antigen and 26 days prior to HBV e antigen detection. The target-capture PCR assay was also compared with four commercially available NAT assays, and the various units of measure were standardized with respect to the international units of the WHO HBV DNA standard. The target-capture PCR assay is a sensitive, accurate, high-throughput, rapid, and reproducible assay for the determination of HBV loads.

Nucleic-acid amplification technology (NAT) assays have been implemented for HCV and HIV-1 in the United States, and many parts of Europe, Australia and Asia. Nucleic acid detection assays utilize many different technologies, and the WHO International Standards for nucleic acid tests are widely used to compare them. Currently, several laboratories are developing an assay for simultaneous detection of HCV RNA, HIV-1 RNA and HBV DNA. In the course of such development it was observed that the WHO International Standard for HIV-1 RNA (97/656) was positive for HBV DNA. In this report we confirm the presence of HBV DNA in the HIV-1 international standard through the qualitative Procleix-Ultrio assay. Further, using the TaqMan technology, through quantitative Bead Capture-TaqMan assay, we report that approximately 1000IU/ml dilution of HIV RNA contains approximately 4500IU/ml of HBV DNA.

BACKGROUND: An attempt has been made to determine the minimum level of HCV nucleic acid in donors associated with infection of recipients. This is important for considerations about assay sensitivity, use of minipool versus single-donation testing, and continued use of serologic testing. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 5387 specimens from the Transfusion-Transmitted Viruses Study in the 1970s were screened for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). The outcome in recipients of seroreactive donations was examined for viremia and seroconversion. Present techniques for both groups included thirdgeneration EIA, RIBA, quantitative RT-PCR assay, and transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay. RESULTS: A total of 156 recipients of components from 180 anti-HCV-reactive donors were identified. Onehundred seven of these were HCV-naive before transfusion and received a single, confirmed seropositive unit; 94 (88%) became infected. Eighty-five recipients had donors whose HCV RNA level was quantifiable by RTPCR (range, 182-3,310,000 copies/mL). Eighty-three (98%) seroconverted. Of the remaining 22, a total of 10 received units positive for HCV RNA detected only by TMA; all 10 recipients seroconverted. Of the remaining 12 recipients of anti-HCV + , TMA-negative units, 1 recipient seroconverted. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of transmission were seen at all levels of viremia, and one donor transmitted with undetectable levels in the TMA assay. Current HCV RNA testing will therefore not interdict all infectious units, even with single-donation testing, and serologic screening must be continued. here has been enormous progress in reducing the risk of HCV transmission by blood components over the past several decades. 1 However, a small risk remains and efforts to reduce that risk continue. In the context of serologic screening, the most common cause of HCV transmission by transfusion is the occurrence of new infections in donors who present in the viremic window period before antibodies to HCV (antiHCV) become detectable.

BACKGROUND: In 1996, the Ortho HCV Version 3.0 ELISA Test System (HCV 3.0 EIA) was licensed in the United States for donor screening but was neither mandated nor universally implemented. Data from two studies comparing the differential performance of HCV 3.0 EIA and HCV 2.0 EIA are presented. The first study evaluated the differential performance in a cross-section of screened whole-blood donors after implementation of HCV 3.0 EIA; the second study evaluated the differential performance of HCV 3.0 EIA in plasma donors acutely infected with HCV, identified during routine Abbott HCV 2.0 EIA and HCV NAT (using Roche Ampliscreen plate assay) donor screening. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The first study evaluated HCV 3.0 EIA repeat-reactive donations from four US blood centers, identified during the first 5 months of HCV 3.0 EIA implementation. HCV EIA repeat-reactive donations confirmed by RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA were retested using both Ortho HCV Version 2.0 ELISA Test System and Abbott HCV 2.0 EIA. All EIA-discordant donations were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the second study, Abbott HCV 2.0 EIA-nonreactive, HCV PCR-positive donors were enrolled in a follow-up study in which the index and follow-up samples were re-evaluated by HCV 3.0 EIA. RESULTS: In the first study, of 292,459 donations, 501 (0.17%) confirmed HCV 3.0 EIA-reactive donations were identified; 15 (0.005%) were nonreactive by Ortho HCV 2.0 EIA and were all HCV RNA negative. In the second study, Ortho HCV 3.0 EIA retesting of Abbott HCV 2.0 EIA-nonreactive, RNA-positive index donations identified 16 (23%) as 3.0 EIA reactive. In 42 panels with a discordant time of seroconversion, HCV 3.0 EIA sero-conversion preceded HCV 2.0 EIA in all cases (p < 0.001). Two donors with HCV 3.0 EIA-reactive index donations never seroconverted by HCV 2.0 EIA during 160 to 180 days of follow-up. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate that HCV 3.0 EIA compared to HCV 2.0 EIA can better detect 1) remote nonviremic HCV infections, 2) acute infection, and 3) HCV antibodies in cases of atypical seroconversion.

The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission by transfusion in sub-Saharan Africa is considered to be relatively low, and testing of blood donors is often not done or is done relatively poorly. To re-examine this attitude, we identified HBV chronically infected blood donors from a major hospital in Ghana with a range of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assays. Test efficacy was estimated using HBV DNA as a gold standard, and the risk of HBV infection in blood recipients was estimated for different testing strategies. Particle agglutination, dipstick, and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) HBsAg screening detected 54%, 71%, and 97% of HBV infectious donors, respectively. The risk of HBV transmission to recipients less than 10 years old ranged between 1:11 and 1:326 with blood unscreened and screened by EIA, respectively. For older recipients, the risk decreased a further 4-fold because of the high frequency of natural exposure to HBV. A total of 98% of HBsAg-confirmed positive samples contained HBV DNA. HBV DNA load was less than 1 × 104 IU/mL in 75% of HBsAg-reactive samples, most of them anti-HBe reactive. Approximately 0.5% of HBsAg-negative but anti-HBc-positive samples contained HBV DNA. The use of sensitive HBsAg tests is critical to prevent transfusion transmission of HBV infection to young children in a population with a 15% prevalence of chronic HBV infection in blood donors. However, this will not have much effect on the prevalence of this infection unless other strategies to protect children from infection are also advanced in parallel.

Surveillance for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is limited by the challenge of differentiating between acute and chronic infections. In this study, we evaluate a cross-sectional testing strategy that identifies individuals with acute HCV infection and we estimate HCV incidence. Anti-HCV-negative persons from four populations with various risks, i.e., blood donors, Veterans Administration (VA) patients, young injection drug users (IDU), and older IDU, were screened for HCV RNA by minipool or individual sample nucleic acid testing (NAT). The number of detected viremic seronegative infections was combined with the duration of the preseroconversion NAT-positive window period (derived from analysis of frequent serial samples from plasma donors followed from NAT detection to seroconversion) to estimate annual HCV incidence rates. Projected incidence rates were compared to observed incidence rates. Projected HCV incidence rates per 100 person-years were 0.0042 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.0025 to 0.007) for blood donors, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.71) for VA patients, 39.8 (95% CI, 25.9 to 53.7) for young IDU, and 53.7 (95% CI, 23.4 to 108.8) for older IDU. Projected rates were most similar to observed incidence rates for young IDU (33.4; 95% CI, 28.0 to 39.9). This study demonstrates the value of applying a cross-sectional screening strategy to detect acute HCV infections and to estimate HCV incidence.

We assessed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody seroreversion among individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) during acute/early HIV infection and determined whether seroreversion was associated with loss of cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. Subjects in a cohort with acute/early HIV infection (!12 months into infection) who initiated ART within 28 days after study entry and maintained HIV type 1 ribonucleic acid levels of _500 copies/mL for 124 weeks were selected. Two clinically available second-generation enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and a confirmatory Western blot were used to screen subjects for antibody reversion. Those with negative screening test results underwent additional antibody testing including a third-generation EIA and were assessed for cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. Of 87 subjects identified 12 (14%) had negative antibody test results at the start of ART; all 12 had seroconversion although 1 had seroconversion only on a third-generation EIA. Of the 87 subjects 6 (7%) had seroreversion on at least 1 EIA antibody assay while receiving ART during a median follow-up of 90 weeks. The only clinical predictor of seroreversion was a low baseline "detuned" (less sensitive) antibody. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to HIV Gag peptides were detected in 4 of 5 subjects with seroreversion who could be tested. All 5 who had seroreversion who stopped ART experienced virologic rebound and antibody evolution. HIV antibody seroconversion on second-generation EIA antibody tests may fail to occur when ART is initiated early. Seroreversion was not uncommon among subjects treated early although cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to HIV antigens remained detectable in most subjects. Antibody seroreversion did not indicate viral eradication. A third-generation EIA was the most sensitive test for HIV antibodies. (authors)

The current commercially licensed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) mainly use recombinant proteins containing linear epitopes. There is evidence, however, that conformational epitopes of HCV are more immunoreactive. Thus, we have designed an HCV antibody assay that employs a conformational protein, NS3NS4a PI (with functional protease and helicase activities), and a linear fusion protein, multiple-epitope fusion antigen 7.1 (MEFA 7.1) or MEFA 7.2. We have shown that NS3NS4a PI detects early-seroconversion conformation-sensitive antibodies better than c33c antigen. The correct conformation of NS3NS4a PI also cross-reacts with different genotype samples better than the c33c antigen. MEFA 7.1 and MEFA 7.2 incorporate all the major immunodominant and genotype-specific epitopes of HCV core, E1, E2 hypervariable region 1 (HVR1), E2 HVR1-plus-HVR2 consensus, NS3, NS4, and NS5. Since MEFA 7.1 is degraded by the active NS3NS4a PI protease, we designed a second MEFA 7.2 construct in which the six protease cleavage sites found in MEFA 7.1 were eliminated by amino acid mutation. We demonstrate here that MEFA 7.2 remains intact in the presence of NS3NS4a PI and preserves the epitopes present in MEFA 7.1. Compared to currently licensed assays, an ELISA incorporating a combination of the two antigens NS3NS4a PI and MEFA 7.1 or 7.2 demonstrates better serotype sensitivity and detects seroconversion earlier in many commercially available panels. We believe that an assay using NS3NS4a PI and MEFA 7.1 or 7.2 may have the potential to replace current HCV immunoassays for better sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Newly implemented NAT has been shown to be able to effectively identify HCV-positive blood donated during the preseroconversion period. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: EDTA-plasma pools of 24 donations were tested using an HIV-1/HCV multiplex NAT under an FDA-approved IND application. Samples in a positive pool were retested individually. Positive samples were further tested by two discriminatory assays to determine specific viral reactivity. Upon obtaining informed consent, seronegative donors with positive NAT results were enrolled into a follow-up study for risk factor analysis and laboratory testing. RESULTS: A donation by a 29 year old female was identified as HCV NAT-positive with negative serology and an elevated ALT. Her two previous donations, 5 and 12 months earlier, were both seronegative and with normal ALT. Her husband tested positive for HCV RNA. The donor remained seronegative for at least 36 days. The index donation had a viral RNA concentration of >500,000 copies per mL while the first seropositive sample was NAT-negative. Laboratory data on serial follow-up samples showed 100- to 1,000-fold fluctuations in viral load during a period of 48 days prior to seroconversion. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that, at least in some newly infected individuals, the HCV viral load can fluctuate dramatically prior to seroconversion, and that NAT, even on individual samples, will not totally prevent HCV transmission.

ContextCurrent screening practices for blood donations have been successful in reducing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission through receipt of contaminated blood products. However, HIV-infected blood donations made prior to seroconversion and before high levels of viral replication occur could test negative using both serologic antigen and antibody tests. Testing based on nucleic acid amplification (NAT) is being implemented to screen for HIV-infected blood donated during this period, yet the issue of single vs minipool donation screening remains unresolved.ObjectivesTo determine HIV-1 genetic linkage between virus in 2 HIV-1–infected recipients of blood components and virus in the donor, who was HIV antigen and antibody negative at the time of donation; to screen the blood donor's plasma with HIV NAT assays, including those currently proposed for use in US blood donation screening.Design and SettingCase study conducted in October 1997 involving the Communicable Disease Centre, Singapore General Hospital, and the Singapore Blood Transfusion Service, Singapore.SubjectsThe blood donor and the 2 recipients of donor platelets and red blood cells.Main Outcome MeasuresGenetic analysis of the HIV-1 p17 coding region of gag and the C2V5 region of env to determine the genetic relatedness of virus from the donor and recipients; reactivity in quantitative and qualitative assays, and reactivity in donor screening HIV NAT assays in single donation and minipool screening contexts.ResultsDirect DNA sequencing demonstrated identical HIV-1 subtype E viral sequences in the donor and recipients. Based on comparisons of a qualitative and quantitative assay for HIV-1 RNA levels, a low level of viremia (range, 5-39 copies/mL in plasma) was estimated to be in the donor's undiluted blood at the time of donation. Additional testing using donor-screening NAT assays showed consistent detection of HIV RNA in the undiluted donor plasma whereas detection was inconsistent at the 1:16 and 1:24 dilution levels currently used in minipool screening of blood donations in the United States.ConclusionsTransmission of HIV from a blood donor to a platelet recipient and a red blood cell recipient occurred in the preseroconversion infectious window period. The viral load in the implicated donation was estimated to be less than 40 copies/mL of plasma. Current US minipool HIV NAT screening protocols may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect all infectious window-period donations.