Search

African swine fever (ASF) is a lethal haemorrhagic disease of domestic pigs for which there is no vaccine. Strains of the virus with reduced virulence can provide protection against related virulent strains of ASFV, but protection is not 100% and there are concerns about the safety profile of such viruses. However, they provide a useful tool for understanding the immune response to ASFV and previous studies using the low virulent isolate OUR T88/3 have shown that CD8+ cells are crucial for protection. In order to develop a vaccine that stimulates an effective anti-ASFV T-cell response we need to know which of the >150 viral proteins are recognized by the cellular immune response. Therefore, we used a gamma interferon ELIspot assay to screen for viral proteins recognized by lymphocytes from ASF-immune pigs using peptides corresponding to 133 proteins predicted to be encoded by OUR T88/3. Eighteen antigens that were recognized by ASFV-specific lymphocytes were then incorporated into adenovirus and MVA vectors, which were used in immunization and challenge experiments in pigs. We present a systematic characterization of the cellular immune response to this devastating disease and identify proteins capable of inducing ASFV-specific cellular and humoral immune responses in pigs. Pools of viral vectors expressing these genes did not protect animals from severe disease, but did reduce viremia in a proportion of pigs following ASFV challenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many of the approximately 165 proteins encoded by the African swine fever virus (ASFV) genome do not have significant similarity to known proteins and have not been studied experimentally. One such protein is DP148R. We showed that the DP148R gene is transcribed at early times postinfection. Deletion of this gene did not reduce virus replication in macrophages, showing that it is not essential for replication in these cells. However, deletion of this gene from a virulent isolate, Benin 97/1, producing the BeninΔDP148R virus, dramatically reduced the virulence of the virus in vivo. All pigs infected with the BeninΔDP148R virus survived infection, showing only transient mild clinical signs soon after immunization. Following challenge with the parental virulent virus, all pigs immunized by the intramuscular route (11/11) and all except one immunized by the intranasal route (5/6) survived. Mild or no clinical signs were observed after challenge. As expected, control nonimmune pigs developed signs of acute African swine fever (ASF). The virus genome and infectious virus were observed soon after immunization, coincident with the onset of clinical signs (∼106 genome copies or 50% tissue culture infective doses/ml). The levels of the virus genome declined over an extended period up to 60 days postimmunization. In contrast, infectious virus was no longer detectable by days 30 to 35. Gamma interferon (IFN-γ) was detected in serum between days 4 and 7 postimmunization, and IFN-γ-producing cells were detected in all pigs analyzed following stimulation of immune lymphocytes with whole virus. ASFV-specific antibodies were first detected from day 10 postimmunization. IMPORTANCE African swine fever (ASF) is endemic in Africa, parts of the Trans Caucasus, the Russian Federation, and several European countries. The lack of a vaccine hinders control. Many of the ASF virus genes lack similarity to known genes and have not been characterized. We have shown that one of these, DP148R, is transcribed early during virus replication in cells and can be deleted from the virus genome without reducing virus replication. The virus with the gene deletion, BeninΔDP148R, caused mild clinical signs in pigs and induced high levels of protection against challenge with the parental virulent virus. Therefore, deletion of this gene can provide a target for the rational development of vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

African swine fever virus multigene family (MGF) 360 and 505 genes have roles in suppressing the type I interferon response and in virulence in pigs. The role of the individual genes is poorly understood. Different combinations of these genes were deleted from the virulent genotype II Georgia 2007/1 isolate. Deletion of five copies of MGF 360 genes, MGF360-10L, -11L, -12L, -13L, and -14L, and three copies of MGF505-1R, -2R, and -3R reduced virus replication in macrophages and attenuated virus in pigs. However, only 25% of the immunized pigs were protected against challenge. Deletion of MGF360-12L, -13L, and -14L and MGF505-1R in combination with a negative serology marker, K145R (GeorgiaDK145RDMGF(A)), reduced virus replication in macrophages and virulence in pigs, since no clinical signs or virus genome in blood were observed following immunization. Four of six pigs were protected after challenge. In contrast, deletion of MGF360-13L and -14L, MGF505-2R and -3R, and K145R (GeorgiaDK145RDMGF(B)) did not reduce virus replication in macrophages. Following immunization of pigs, clinical signs were delayed, but all pigs reached the humane endpoint. Deletion of genes MGF360-12L, MGF505-1R, and K145R reduced replication in macrophages and attenuated virulence in pigs since no clinical signs or virus genome in blood were observed following immunization. Thus, the deletion of MGF360-12L and MGF505-1R, in combination with K145R, was sufficient to dramatically attenuate virus infection in pigs. However, only two of six pigs were protected, suggesting that deletion of additional MGF genes is required to induce a protective immune response. Deletion of MGF360-12L, but not MGF505-1R, from the GeorgiaDK145R virus reduced virus replication in macrophages, indicating that MGF360-12L was most critical for maintaining high levels of virus replication in macrophages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]