Search

Introduction: Plasma is considered the gold standard for HIV viral load (VL) testing, however its use is challenging due to the need for phlebotomy and centrifugation services, as well as cold chain for transporting to laboratories for testing. The use of Dried Blood Spot (DBS) specimen has allowed a rapid expansion of antiretroviral therapy (ART) monitoring in remote areas in many African countries, however, the VL in DBS may overestimate the copies of viral RNA result at the clinically relevant range of 1000 copies/ml, due to proviral DNA and intracellular RNA. The characteristics of the cobas® Plasma Separation Card (PSC) specimen are similar to fresh plasma (gold standard), so a better performance of HIV VL is expetected in PSC specimen and can be an alternative to DBS. This study aims to evaluate the performance of cobas® PSC for VL testing at primary health care facilities in Mozambique., Methodology: HIV-1 infected adults on ART were enrolled consecutively in two health facilities in Mozambique, between August 2018 and October 2018. Capillary and venous cobas® PSC, DBS and fresh plasma specimens were collected from each patient. All specimens were tested for VL using CAP/CTM v2.0. Sensitivity and specificity of viral load using DBS, capillary and venous PSC specimens were estimated. Viral load obtained in fresh plasma specimen was used as reference and a threshold of 1000 copies/ml was considered for the analyses., Results: From the total 613 patients included for the study, 2444 specimens including DBS (613), plasma (613), venous cobas® PSC (609) and capillary cobas® PSC (609) were collected and 2407 results were obtained. Sensitivity and specificity of the VL using venous cobas®PSC specimen at 1000 copies/ml threshold were 99.8% and 98.1% respectively, whereas for capillary cobas® PSC sensitivity was 99.6% and specificity was 97.2%. For DBS VL, sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity was 81.8%. Misclassification rate was more prominent in DBS specimens (5.9%), but lower in venous and capillary cobas®PSC with a rate of 0.3% and 0.7% respectively., Conclusion: The cobas® PSC specimen has improved performance over DBS for more accurate VL testing aligned with plasma testing. The use of this specimen type can increase the rates of reliable VL results and this will improve the quality of VL monitoring of HIV-positive patients in low-income settings., Competing Interests: All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Viral load testing is the WHO-recommended monitoring assay for patients on HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART). Point-of-care (POC) assays may help improve access to viral load testing in resource-limited settings. We compared the performance of the Alere Q NAT POC viral load technology (Alere Technologies, Jena, Germany), measuring total HIV RNA using finger prick capillary whole-blood samples collected in a periurban health center, with that of a laboratory-based plasma RNA test (Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan v2) conducted on matched venous blood samples. The whole-blood Alere Q NAT POC assay produced results with a bias of 0.8593 log copy/ml compared to the laboratory-based plasma assay. However, at above 10,000 copies/ml, the bias was 0.07 log copy/ml. Using the WHO-recommended threshold to determine ART failure of 1,000 copies/ml, the sensitivity and specificity of the whole-blood Alere Q NAT POC assay were 96.83% and 47.80%, respectively. A cutoff of 10,000 copies/ml of whole blood with the Alere Q NAT POC assay appears to be a better predictor of ART failure threshold (1,000 copies/ml of plasma), with a sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 90.3%. The precision of the whole-blood Alere Q NAT POC assay was comparable to that observed with the laboratory technology (5.4% versus 7.5%) between detectable paired samples. HIV POC viral load testing is feasible at the primary health care level. Further research on the value of whole-blood viral load to monitor antiretroviral therapy is warranted., (Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Objectives: Our study aimed to evaluate the stability of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) RNA on cobas plasma separation card (PSC) specimens for viral load (VL) testing after being exposed to varied temperatures and storage times.Methods: For this purpose, venous PSC specimens were collected and stored at 25ºC to 42ºC for a period of up to 28 days. Plasma VL at baseline was used as reference, against which PSC VL was compared at different time points.Results: From the 30 patients included in the study, 600 PSC and 30 fresh plasma specimens were obtained. Plasma VL at baseline was fewer than 1,000 copies/mL in 16 patients, and 99.4% of PSCs from these patients yielded nonquantifiable VL at all temperature ranges and time points. During the study period, minor variation of VL was observed in PSCs obtained from 13 patients with plasma VL fewer than 1,000 copies/mL at baseline. For the patient with plasma VL at 1,000 copies/mL, the PSC VL varied from undetectable to 1,670 copies/mL.Conclusions: Our results show minor variation of VL in PSC specimens in the study conditions. HIV RNA is stable in PSCs exposed to high temperatures for up to 28 days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Plasma is considered the gold standard for HIV viral load (VL) testing, however its use is challenging due to the need for phlebotomy and centrifugation services, as well as cold chain for transporting to laboratories for testing. The use of Dried Blood Spot (DBS) specimen has allowed a rapid expansion of antiretroviral therapy (ART) monitoring in remote areas in many African countries, however, the VL in DBS may overestimate the copies of viral RNA result at the clinically relevant range of 1000 copies/ml, due to proviral DNA and intracellular RNA. The characteristics of the cobas® Plasma Separation Card (PSC) specimen are similar to fresh plasma (gold standard), so a better performance of HIV VL is expetected in PSC specimen and can be an alternative to DBS. This study aims to evaluate the performance of cobas® PSC for VL testing at primary health care facilities in Mozambique. Methodology: HIV-1 infected adults on ART were enrolled consecutively in two health facilities in Mozambique, between August 2018 and October 2018. Capillary and venous cobas® PSC, DBS and fresh plasma specimens were collected from each patient. All specimens were tested for VL using CAP/CTM v2.0. Sensitivity and specificity of viral load using DBS, capillary and venous PSC specimens were estimated. Viral load obtained in fresh plasma specimen was used as reference and a threshold of 1000 copies/ml was considered for the analyses. Results: From the total 613 patients included for the study, 2444 specimens including DBS (613), plasma (613), venous cobas® PSC (609) and capillary cobas® PSC (609) were collected and 2407 results were obtained. Sensitivity and specificity of the VL using venous cobas®PSC specimen at 1000 copies/ml threshold were 99.8% and 98.1% respectively, whereas for capillary cobas® PSC sensitivity was 99.6% and specificity was 97.2%. For DBS VL, sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity was 81.8%. Misclassification rate was more prominent in DBS specimens (5.9%), but lower in venous and capillary cobas®PSC with a rate of 0.3% and 0.7% respectively. Conclusion: The cobas® PSC specimen has improved performance over DBS for more accurate VL testing aligned with plasma testing. The use of this specimen type can increase the rates of reliable VL results and this will improve the quality of VL monitoring of HIV-positive patients in low-income settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In resource-limited countries, CD4 T-cell (CD4) testing continues to be used for determining antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation eligibility and opportunistic infection monitoring. To support expanded access to CD4 testing, simple and robust technologies are necessary. We conducted this study to evaluate the performance of a new Point-of-Care (POC) CD4 technology, the MyT4, compared to conventional laboratory CD4 testing. Methods: EDTA venous blood from 200 HIV-positive patients was tested in the laboratory using the MyT4 and BD FACSCalibur™. Results: The MyT4 had an r2 of 0.82 and a mean bias of 12.3 cells/μl. The MyT4 had total misclassifications of 14.7% and 8.8% when analyzed using ART eligibility thresholds of 350 and 500 cells/μl, respectively. Conclusions: We conclude that the MyT4 performed well in classifying patients using the current ART initiation eligibility thresholds in Mozambique when compared to the conventional CD4 technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]