Search

Objective: To investigate the clinical significance of using 3D printing guides in modified unilateral puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), and to explore a new method for preventing paravertebral vein leakage during PVP in conjunction with a previous study of the optimal puncture-side bone cement/vertebral volume ratio(PSBCV/VV%)., Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 99 patients who underwent unilateral puncture PVP between January 2023 and December 2023. Patients were divided into a guide plate group (46 patients) and a conventional group (53 patients). The guide plate group underwent modified unilateral puncture PVP with the guidance of 3D printing guides, while the conventional group underwent unilateral puncture PVP using the conventional pedicle approach. The distribution of bone cement, surgical outcomes, and the occurrence of cement leakage into paravertebral veins were observed in both groups., Results: The guide plate group had significantly shorter operating time and required fewer fluoroscopies compared to the conventional group. The amount of bone cement volume (BCV) used in the guide plate group was higher, but the amount of bone cement volume on the puncture side(PSBCV), the PSBCV/VV%, and the rate of paravertebral vein leakage were lower in the guide plate group compared to the conventional group (P < 0.05). Within each group, significant improvements in anterior vertebral margin height, Cobb angle, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were observed at 1 day and 1 month postoperatively compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Using 3D printing guides in modified unilateral puncture PVP is a safe and effective method for treating OVCF. And it has the advantages of short operation time, less fluoroscopy, even distribution of bone cement, and a low rate of paravertebral vein leakage., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a serious complication of osteoporosis, and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a major therapeutic method for OVCF. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and postoperative complications of robot-assisted targeted PVP for the treatment of OVCF. The data from 202 OVCF patients were analyzed in this study, including 72 cases received traditional PVP (PVP group), 68 cases received robot-assisted PVP (R-PVP group), and 62 cases underwent robot-assisted PVP combined with targeted plugging (R-PVP + TP group). The fluoroscopic exposure conditions, operative duration, lengths of stay, postoperative bone cement leakage, refracture, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were obtained and compared between the three groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and logistic regression model were adopted to screen the risk factors related with postoperative refracture. R-PVP and R-PVP + TP group had significantly reduced fluoroscopic frequency and radiation dose, and reduced cement leakage compared with PVP group. R-PVP + TP not only showed more obvious advantages in these aspects, but also had a lower probability of postoperative refracture. In addition, BMD, fracture vertebral distribution, cement leakage, and surgery methods were independent related with refracture. All the results demonstrated robot assistance could improve the application of PVP in the treatment of OVCF, and robot-assisted PVP combined with targeted plugging showed significantly reduced fluoroscopic exposure, bone cement leakage, and rate of postoperative refracture. BMD, fracture vertebral distribution, cement leakage, and operation methods were identified as four risk factors for the onset of refracture after PVP., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive treatment technique for vertebral body compression fractures. The complications associated with this technique can be categorized into mild, moderate, and severe. Among these, the most prevalent complication is cement leakage, which may insert into the epidural, intradiscal, foraminal, and paravertebral regions, and even the venous system. The occurrence of a postprocedural infection carries a notable risk which is inherent to any percutaneous procedure. While the majority of these complications manifest without symptoms, they can potentially lead to severe outcomes. This review aims to consolidate the various complications linked to vertebroplasty, drawing from the experiences of a single medical center.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the unsubtracted roadmap technique (USRT) for decreasing cement leakage (CL) during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent PVP between January and November 2018 were included. Patients were divided into the unsubtracted roadmap (UR) (n = 20) and conventional venography (CV) (n = 22) groups. USRT was performed before cement injection in the UR group. Computed tomography was performed on the first day after PVP in both groups to assess the CL. The vertebral height restoration rate was confirmed by radiography before and after the procedure. The CL location was classified as basivertebral vein (type B), segmental vein (type S), or cortical defect (type C). Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores before and after surgery were calculated to confirm clinical outcomes., Results: Based on the computed tomography images, CL occurred in 7 (34.78%) and 15 (63.64%) cases in the UR and CV groups, respectively. Number of CL type B, S, and C in the UR and CV groups were 2 and 6, 3 and 6, and 2 and 3, respectively. The injected cement volume was not significantly different between the UR (4.86 mL) and the CV (4.75 mL) groups (P = 0.450). Regarding vertebral body height restoration (P = 0.856) and clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences between both groups. Radiation exposure was significantly less in the UR group (P = 0.019)., Conclusions: USRT is an effective method for reducing CL and radiation exposure during PVP., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Osteoporotic vertebral body compression fracture are the commonest fractures amongst the other osteoporotic fracture sites. These fragility fractures are the result of low energy mechanical forces that that would not ordinarily result in fracture. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty has been widely used as minimally invasive procedures to treat painful vertebral compression fractures., Purpose: Aim of the present study was to evaluate radiological, clinical and functional outcome of patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures treated with Balloon Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty., Study Design: Prospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: 40 patients (Male:15, Female: 25) with average age of 56 +/- 8 years diagnosed with osteoporotic vertebral body compression fracture on clinical and radiological evaluation with no neurological deficit and no other associated fractures were included., Outcome Measures: Operative time, cost for the procedure, gain in vertebral body height, reduction in pain, ability to perform daily routine activities, risk of cement leakage and any other systemic complications were evaluated and compared in both the study groups., Methods: All the patients underwent conventional Xray, MRI (to rule out acute from chronic fracture, to check compromise of spinal canal and calculate collapse in vertebral body height), Visual analog scaling for severity of pain and difficulty in daily routine activities by Oswestry disability index preoperatively. Post operative clinal, functional, radiological outcome and complications were compared in patients treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty., Result: There was significant difference in intraoperative time period and procedure cost for the patients treated with Vertebroplasty(50.75min, 25k) in comparison to balloon kyphoplasty (71.95, 50k) with p value being < .001 There was significant difference between preoperative and postoperative study parameters in both the study groups but there was no significant difference in post operative study parameters amongst both the study groups with p values >.05 for different parameters, 0.381(Gain in vertebral height), 0.108 (pain relief), 0.846(Oswestry disability index) and 0.197(risk of cement leakage) CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that percutaneous vertebroplasty requires less operative time and is more economical than balloon kyphoplasty. Increase in intraoperative time increases the risk of infection. Though the cases of Intraoperative operative cement leakage were more in percutaneous vertebroplasty but is was not significant. However the final radiological, clinical, functional outcome and overall complications were found to be similar in both the groups. Balloon kyphoplasty provided no added benefit over percutaneous vertebroplasty. A study with larger sample size will be needed to warrant one surgical procedure superior to other in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fracture., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bone cement has been used in spinal surgery for as long as 50 years. In contemporary spinal surgery, cement augmentation of fractured osteoporotic vertebrae in the form of vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty as well as cement augmentation of pedicle screws in instrumented procedures of any etiology are established as standard procedures. Both procedures are very effective, although the benefits of vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty procedures have been controversially discussed in the past. Overall, complications rarely occur. The most relevant complication is cement leakage, which is asymptomatic in the majority of cases but in the worst case might lead to neurological deficits, embolic events and even circulatory collapse. Prevention of cement leakage is therefore crucial. Risk factors for cement leakage and preventive measures are presented in a comprehensive review based on the available literature., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objective: The objective of this research was to investigate the risk factors of cement leakage in patients with metastatic spine tumors following percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)., Methods: Sixty-four patients with 113 vertebrae were retrospectively reviewed. Various clinical indexes, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, drinking history, chemotherapy history, radiotherapy history, primary cancer, location, other metastases, collapse, posterior wall defects, the laterality of injection, and the injected cement volume were analyzed as potential risk factors. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the independent risk factors., Results: The cement leakage was found 64 in 113 treated vertebrae (56.63%), in which the incidence of each type was shown as below: spinal canal leakage 18 (15.93%), intravascular leakage around the vertebrae 11 (9.73%), and intradiscal and paravertebral leakage 35 (30.97%). Tomita classification (P = 0.019) and posterior wall destruction (P = 0.001) were considered strong risk factors for predicting cement leakage in general. The multivariate logistic analysis showed that defects of the posterior wall (P = 0.001) and injected volume (P = 0.038) were independently related to the presence of spinal canal leakage. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and activities of daily living (ADL) scores showed significant differences compared with the pre-operative parameters (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in every follow-up time between the leakage group and the non-leakage group for pain management and improvement of activities in daily life., Conclusion: In our study, Tomita classification and the destruction of the posterior wall were independent risk factors for leakage in general. The defects of the posterior wall and injected volume were independently related to the presence of spinal canal leakage. The PVP procedure can be an effective way to manage the pain., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of the combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and vertebroplasty versus single vertebroplasty in treating spinal metastases., Materials and Methods: The data of 35 patients with vertebral neoplastic lesions who received RFA combined with vertebroplasty (group A, 15 patients with 17 lesions) or single vertebroplasty (group B, 20 patients with 24 lesions) from March 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively compared. The data of patients' Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores prior to the treatments, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the treatments, injected cement volume, ratios of cement leakage were compared between the two groups., Results: All procedures were successfully done without severe complications. The VAS scores in group A were decreased more rapidly 1 week after the treatments and remained more stable at 6 months than that in group B (P < 0.05). The cement injected in group A (5.95 ± 1.45 mL, range 4-9.5 mL) was significantly more than that in group B (4.09 ± 0.55 mL, range 3.1-5.5 mL) (P < 0.05). The ratio of vascular cement leakage in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P < 0.05), while no statistical difference was found in the non-vascular cement leakage (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Our study shows that the combination of RFA and vertebroplasty has a better analgesic effect with more injected cement and lower rates of venous cement leakage than single vertebroplasty., (© 2021. ISS.)

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the risk variables for predicting intra-spinal canal cement leakage, especially among elderly patients with spine metastases after being treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Furthermore, we proposed and validated a nomogram to stratify risks of intra-spinal canal cement leakage., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 163 elderly patients (age ≧65 years) with spine metastases who underwent PVP. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n=100) and a validation cohort (n=63). The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen potential risk variables in the training cohort. Significant risk variables were included in the nomogram, and the nomogram was developed according to the estimates of the each included variable. The predictive effectiveness of the nomogram was validated using discrimination and calibration performance., Results: The overall prevalence of intra-spinal canal cement leakage was 9.82% (16/163). In the training cohort, female patients (14.71%, 5/34) showed a higher rate of intra-spinal canal cement leakage as compared with male patients (4.55%, 3/66). The nomogram consisted of sex, cortical osteolytic destruction in posterior wall, and load-bearing lines of spine. The nomogram had acceptable discrimination, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.75 in the training cohort, 0.64 in the validation cohort, and 0.69 in the entire cohort, and also showed favorable calibration based on the goodness-of-fit test. According to the nomogram, three risk groups were developed: the low risk group had an actual probability of 7.03%, the medium risk group was 11.54%, and high risk group was 44.44%. The difference between the three groups was significant (P ˂ 0.01)., Conclusion: Intra-spinal canal cement leakage after PVP is not scarce among elderly patients. We proposed and internally validated a nomogram that is capable of calculating the risk of intra-spinal canal cement leakage among elderly patients with spine metastases. Careful surgical plan should be conducted among patients with a high risk of developing intra-spinal canal cement leakage., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© 2021 Shi et al.)

Background: The impact of intravertebral cleft (IVC) on cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) has been discussed. However, the results were conflicting, as the study population and cement leakage classification were heterogeneous. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of IVC on the incidence of leakage through vein, leakage through cortex as well as general leakage in PVP for OVCFs., Methods: All patients with OVCFs who underwent PVP between January 2016 and June 2019 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were eligible for this case-control study if they were diagnosed as single level fracture in spine. After inclusive and exclusive criteria were met, a total of 139 patients with IVC were enrolled as the study group. Non-IVC controls were matched in a 1:1 ratio in age (within 3 years), sex and fracture severity with patients in study group. Cement leakage were classified into four types [type B (through basivertebral vein), type S (through segmental vein), type-C (through a cortical defect), and type D (intradiscal leakage)], furtherly into two types [venous type (type-B or/and type S) and cortical type (type-C or/and type-D)]. A general leakage rate and a specific leakage rate per each type were compared between both groups., Results: Each group included 139 patients. Groups were homogenous for age, sex, fracture severity, fracture location, fracture type, cement volume, puncture approach and property of cement. Compared with control group, IVC group had a significantly lower rate of type-B (20.9% vs. 31.7%, P = 0.041), type-S (24.5% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.000), and venous type leakage (37.4% vs. 67.6%, P = 0.000), a significantly higher rate of type-C (25.9% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.004), type-D (16.5% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.009), and cortical type leakage (40.3% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.000), no significant difference on the rate of general leakage (67.6% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.109)., Conclusion: IVC decreased the risk of cement leakage through vein and increased the risk of cement leakage through cortex. However, it had no significant effect on the occurrence of general leakage., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This study aims to determine whether outcomes following vertebroplasty with high viscosity cement are superior to low viscosity cement and non-inferior to kyphoplasty in the setting of vertebral compression fractures., Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies assessing cement leakage rate in adult patients with VCFs who underwent vertebroplasty with high (HVCV) or low viscosity cement (LVCV) augmentation, or kyphoplasty (KP) in PubMed, Embase, Ovid, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception up to December 2019. Two authors extracted data and appraised risk of bias. We performed pairwise meta-analyses in R to compare differences between three treatments and network meta-analysis using frequentist random-effects models for indirect comparison. We used P-score to rate the overall certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was cement leakage rate., Results: Five RCTs and eight cohort studies with 840 patients and a total of 1280 vertebral bodies were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis. Compared to LVCV, the relative risk for cement leakage following HVCV and KP was 0.42 (95% CI 0.28-0.61) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.40-1.68), respectively. Our pooled results suggested that HVCV (P-score = 0.99) was better than KP (P-score = 0.36) in cement leakage rate., Conclusions: The present network meta-analysis demonstrated that HVCV may be associated with lower risk of cement leakage among patients with VCFs as compared to other augmentation techniques. Future prospective studies will validate the findings of this analysis and further elucidate the risk of symptomatic cement leakage., (© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was first reported in 1987 for treating vertebral hemangiomas. PVP is also an effective treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture that mainly involves a percutaneous injection of polymethylmethacrylate. Severe complications of PVP have been reported in recent years. However, to the best of our knowledge, cement-associated thrombotic embolism in the inferior vena cava and bilateral iliac veins after PVP has rarely been reported. We experienced a patient with cement-associated thrombotic embolism in the inferior vena cava and bilateral iliac veins after PVP. Fortunately, after conservative therapy, we achieved a satisfactory result. Unfortunately, we could not explain the cause of the cement leakage and formation of the thrombotic embolism. We believe that surgeons should have a better understanding of the fracture pattern and anatomy of the vertebral venous net system. They should also perform meticulous imaging monitoring with slower pushing of the cement to minimize the risks during the PVP. This case report highlights a rare, but potentially life-threatening, complication of PVP. Surgeons need to be aware of the possibility of cement leakage and the formation of cement-associated thrombotic embolism so that they are much more vigilant when performing PVP.

Background: Vertebroplasty (VP) is considered an alternative therapy in an osteoporotic compression fracture that failed conservative treatment. However, cement leakage into the intradural space can cause catastrophic complications. To the best of our knowledge, intradural cement leakage following VP has been reported only in 7 cases. We report here a case of intradural cement leakage following VP with a literature review., Case Presentation: An 84-year-old female with an L1 osteoporotic fracture underwent percutaneous VP at a local hospital. Immediately after the procedure, she complained of weakness, numbness, and pain in both legs, and her back pain aggravated. She was transferred to our hospital. The initial muscle power was grade 2 for the right leg and grade 4 for the left leg. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed intradural cement leakage from T10 to L2. Magnetic resonance imaging showed an intradural mass lesion. Although we performed total laminectomy with durotomy and removed intradural cement completely, the neurological deficit did not completely recover. The muscle power was grade 3 for the right leg and grade 4 for the left leg at the last follow-up., Conlcusions: If a neurological deficit is found after VP, a CT scan should be taken to confirm the pattern of cement leakage. In case of intradural cement leakage, surgical decompression should be recommended to improve neurological deficit. To prevent intradural cement leakage during the VP, the needle tip should not perforate the medial wall of the pedicle with appropriate viscosity of cement., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Delayed neurological deficits secondary to percutaneous vertebroplasty caused by cement leakage is a rare condition. Although cement extravasation during percutaneous vertebroplasty is not uncommon, most cases are clinically asymptomatic, and symptomatic cement extravasation that requires surgical excision is rarely reported. Herein, a case of L4 radiculopathy secondary to cement leakage is reported that involved the delayed onset of neurological symptoms. The patient was treated using a minimally invasive transforaminal endoscopic approach. The clinical and imaging findings and treatment methods are discussed.

Purpose: To investigate risk factors of bone cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF)., Methods: A total of 236 patients (344 vertebrae) who underwent PVP between November 2016 and June 2020 were enrolled in the study. Clinical and radiological characteristics, including age, gender, course of disease, trauma, type of vertebral fracture, cortical continuity of vertebral body, intervertebral vacuum cleft (IVC), fracture severity, fracture level, basivertebral foramen, bone cement dispersion types, the cement injection volume, the type of cement leakage, puncture approach, and intrusion of the posterior wall, were considered as potential risk factors. Three types of leakage (type-B, type-C, and type-S) were defined and risk factors for each type were analyzed. Logistic analysis was used to study the relationship between each factor and the type of cement leakage., Results: The incidences of the three types of leakage were 28.5%, 24.4%, and 34.3%. The multinomial logistic analysis revealed that the factors of type-B leakage were the shape of cement and basivertebral foramen. One significant factor related to type-C leakage was cortical disruption, and the factors of type-S leakage were bone cement dispersion types, basivertebral foramen, cleft, fracture severity, an intrusion of the posterior wall, and gender., Conclusion: Different types of cement leakage have their own risk factors, and the analysis of risk factors of these might be helpful in reducing the rate of cement leakage.

Background: Vertebral augmentation is the first-line treatment for the osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures. Bone cement leakage is the most common complication of this surgery. This study aims to assess the risk factors for different types of cement leakage and provides a nomogram for predicting the cement intradiscal leakage., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 268 patients who underwent vertebral augmentation procedure between January 2015 and March 2019. The cement leakage risk factors were evaluated by univariate analysis. Different types of cement leakage risk factors were identified by the stepwise logistic analysis. We provided a nomogram for predicting the cement intradiscal leakage and used the concordance index to assess the prediction ability., Results: A total of 295 levels of vertebrae were included, with a leakage rate of 32.5%. Univariate analysis showed delayed surgery and lower vertebral compression ratio were the independent risk factors of cement leakage. The stepwise logistic analysis revealed percutaneous vertebroplasty was a risk factor in vein cement leakage; delayed surgery, preoperative compression ratio, and upper endplate disruption were in intradiscal cement leakage; age, preoperative fracture severity, and intravertebral vacuum cleft were in perivertebral soft tissue cement leakage; no factor was in spinal canal cement leakage. The nomogram for intradiscal cement leakage had a precise prediction ability with an original concordance index of 0.75., Conclusions: Delayed surgery and more vertebral compression increase the risk of cement leakage. Different types of cement leakage have different risk factors. We provided a nomogram for precise predicting the intradiscal cement leakage.

ABSTRACT To measure the projection of the most anterior line of the spinal canal on lateral radiographs of the vertebra (C3-L5) and evaluate the efficacy of the safety line (SL) in preventing intraspinal cement leakage in percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Purpose: Fifteen adult dry-bone spine specimens were analyzed. The projection of the SL was viewed on lateral radiographs. The distance between the SL and the posterior vertebral body line (PVBL) was measured. Two groups of patients were treated by PKP, and cement injection was stopped either before the PBVL (group 1) or before the SL (group 2) under lateral fluoroscopy. The rate of cement leakage was compared between the two groups. Materials and Methods: Fifteen adult dry-bone spine specimens were analyzed. The projection of the SL was viewed on lateral radiographs. The distance between the SL and the posterior vertebral body line (PVBL) was measured. Two groups of patients were treated by PKP, and cement injection was stopped either before the PBVL (group 1) or before the SL (group 2) under lateral fluoroscopy. The rate of cement leakage was compared between the two groups. Results: The largest distance between the SL and PVBL was at L1 (5.22 ± 0.62 mm). From L1 to L5, the distance decreased progressively to 1.05 ± 0.64 mm. Similar variation was also observed from L1 to T1 (0.19 ± 0.18 mm). The postoperative computed tomography scan was more sensitive and accurate in detecting intraspinal leakage than radiography in group 1 ( p = 0.063). The rate of intraspinal cement leakage was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 ( p = 0.063). The rate of intraspinal cement leakage was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 ( p = 0.000). Conclusions: The operator should frequently check to ensure that cement injection has stopped upon reaching the SL. Surgeons may benefit from this quantitative anatomical study of PKP and PVP.

Background: Vertebral compression fracture is one of the most common complications of osteoporosis. In this study an unilateral curved vertebroplasty device was developed, and the safety, effectiveness, and surgical parameters of curved vertebroplasty (CVP) in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was investigated and compared with traditional bipedicular vertebroplasty (BVP)., Methods: We investigated 104 vertebral augmentation procedures performed over 36 months. CVP and BVP procedures were compared for baseline clinical variables, pain relief (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), disability improvement (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), operation time, number of fluoroscopic images, volume of cement per level, and cement leakage rate for each level treated. Complications and refracture incidence were also recorded in the two groups., Results: The VAS and ODI in both group had no significant difference preoperative (P > 0.05), and a significant postoperative improvement in the VAS scores and ODI was found in both group (P < 0.001). However, the CVP group had significantly lower operation time, number of fluoroscopic images, and cement leakage rate per level than the BVP group (P < 0.05); however, the volumes of cement per level were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). Neither group had any serious complications. Five and two patients in the BVP group developed refractures at non-adjacent and adjacent levels, respectively, with one patient developing refractures twice; however, none of the patients in the CVP group developed refractures at any level., Conclusions: Our findings revealed that both CVP and BVP were safe and effective treatments for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, and CVP entails a shorter operation time, less exposure to fluoroscopy, and lower rate of cement leakage.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of the second puncture and injection technique during a percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) procedure., Methods: Patients treated with a second puncture and injection (group A) or a single puncture and injection (group B) during PVP at our institution during 2010-2017 were reviewed. Vertebral height loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), adjacent vertebral fractures, and cement leakage were compared between the groups., Results: A total of 193 patients were enrolled (86 cases in group A, 107 cases in group B). The follow-up period was 15.64 (12-20) months. The loss of anterior (group A 0.01 ± 0.03; group B 0.14 ± 0.17) and middle (group A 0.13 ± 0.12; group B 0.16 ± 0.11) vertebral height in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.05). The VAS score and ODI were also significantly higher in group B than in group A at the final follow-up; the VAS score and ODI in group B were 1.65 ± 0.70 and 14.50 ± 4.16, respectively, and those in group A were 1.00 ± 0.74 and 12.81 ± 4.02, respectively (P < 0.05). Three patients in group A and two in group B experienced adjacent vertebral fractures. Regarding mild, moderate, and severe cement leakage, there were 25 (29%), 5 (5%), and 0 cases, respectively, in group A and 28 (26%), 3 (2.8%), and 1 (0.009%) case, respectively, in group B (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: The second puncture and injection technique may effectively increase the dispersion of cement, thus preventing recompression of the cemented vertebral body, and it does not increase the risk of cement leakage or adjacent vertebral fracture.

Objective: To evaluate and compare clinical outcomes and cement leakage of high-viscosity bone cement versus low-viscosity bone cement vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral cleft., Methods: The study included 72 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral cleft, who were divided into high-viscosity cement (HVC) (38 cases) and low-viscosity cement (LVC) (34 cases) groups according to the viscosity of bone cement used. Cement leakage, visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and kyphotic angle (KA) were evaluated., Results: All patients were followed for at least 12 months. Overall cement leakage rate was 18.4% in the HVC group, lower than the rate of 61.8% obtained in the LVC group. A statistically significant difference was found in the overall cement leakage rate between the groups (P < 0.05). Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were significantly improved after percutaneous vertebroplasty without significant differences between the HVC and LVC groups (P > 0.05). The KA of patients from both groups was also significantly corrected immediately after surgery. Although the KA gradually increased in both groups during the follow-up period, there was no statistically significant difference between the HVC and LVC groups in KA during follow-up (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Percutaneous vertebroplasty using HVC to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral cleft significantly reduces cement leakage and improves the safety of the operation. In terms of clinical efficacy and prevention of augmented vertebral recollapse, HVC may not have obvious advantages., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Foraminal stenosis, a common disorder occurring in elderly patients, is often caused by narrowing of the foramen, resulting in the confinement of neural structures by the tissue and vertebrae. Full-endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty (FELF) is an effective treatment option for patients with foraminal stenosis. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has reported the treatment of symptomatic cement leakage. We report a case of symptomatic cement leakage treated with FELF with the patient under local anesthesia., Case Description: An 85-year-old woman was admitted to our spine unit because of lower back pain. The patient had presented with lower back pain and new-onset left thigh pain after vertebroplasty performed 3 months previously. The patient was not able to walk and was bedridden. To overcome this problem, T12 percutaneous vertebroplasty and left transforaminal L3-L4 foraminoplasty was performed with the patient under local anesthesia. After surgery, the patient was able to walk and was discharged 4 days postoperatively., Conclusion: The present report has shown that FELF can successfully remove symptomatic cement leakage, resulting in pain relief., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Percutaneous vertebroplasty consists of percutaneous injection of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) via a transpedicular approach for the treatment of collapsed osteoporotic or metastatic vertebrae. Even if percutaneous vertebroplasty is considered to be minimally invasive, threatening complications can occur. Cement leakage is the most common complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rigorous patient selection and individual therapeutic strategy may reduce the occurrence of leakage, in particular the risk of cement entry into the venous system and the spinal canal is the potent major hazard of this technique. Cement pulmonary and cardiac embolism are reported in literature as a cause of unexpected death after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Authors report a fatal case of pulmonary cement embolization occurred after vertebroplasty with haemopericardium, due to the perforation of the right atrium wall from a cement solidified fragment. A complete post mortem examination documented the presence of multiple cement fragments in the pulmonary arteries and transmural perforation of the wall of the right atrium by a whitish needle-like foreign body. Pulmonary microembolization was observed under polarized light., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Cement augmentation techniques are standard treatments for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Compared with vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty is associated with lower rates of cement leak and better deformity correction; however, posterior wall fractures are relative, but not absolute; contraindications for both techniques and hence treatment practices vary among spine centers., Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to assess our center's incidence of posterior cement leakage in osteoporotic vertebral fractures with posterior wall injury treated by balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). Secondarily, physiological results, pain relief, complication rates, and non-posterior cement leakage were also evaluated., Study Design: This is a prospective cohort study done in a high-volume spine center in Germany., Patient Sample: Eighty-two patients with 98 osteoporotic vertebral fractures with posterior wall cortical injury were studied from 2012 to 2016., Outcome Measures: The following were the outcome measures: (1) physiological measures: standing plain x-rays (anteroposterior and lateral views), with the following parameters evaluated: cement leak behind the posterior vertebral body border, Cobb angle for local sagittal deformity, vertebral wedge angle, and anterior vertebral height; (2) cement volume injected in each vertebra; and (3) self-report measures: visual analog scale (VAS)., Methods: All patients underwent BKP using a bipedicular approach. Preoperative clinical and neurologic evaluations were done. Radiological evaluations included plain X-ray images, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging. The average follow-up period was 18 months., Results: No cement leakage into the spinal canal occurred in any of the patients. Asymptomatic leakage into other sites was seen in 22 vertebrae (22.45%). There was significant improvement in the Cobb angle, the vertebral wedge angle, and the anterior vertebral height in all cases. The mean preoperative VAS was 8.1, and this improved to 2.3 on the third postoperative day., Conclusion: Balloon kyphoplasty is a viable option for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures even with posterior wall involvement., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of ultra-early injection (before the phase of "tooth-paste-like") of low-viscosity cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs)., Methods: Two hundred sixty-one patients who had PVP procedures with low-viscosity cement (ultra-early injection: 145, normal injection: 135) were included from July 2010 to July 2016 in our hospital. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Cobb angle, cement leakage, and adjacent vertebral fractures were evaluated. The follow-up period was over 12 months., Results: VAS 3.0 d after surgery was significantly reduced in the ultra-early injection group compared to that in the control group (P = 0.00), but no difference was found at the final follow-up (P = 0.53). Similar results were found for ODI. The Cobb angle in both groups was recovered after PVP (P < 0.05); however, in the control group, the Cobb angle at the final follow-up was significantly increased compared with that 3.0 d after surgery (P = 0.00). There was a significant difference in the Cobb angle between the two groups at the final follow-up (P = 0.00). Regarding cement leakage, there were no significant differences in terms of mild (P = 0.58), moderate (P = 0.68), or severe leakage (P = 0.52). Seven patients in the control group had adjacent vertebral fractures, but only one patient in the ultra-early injection group experienced adjacent fractures (P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Ultra-early injection of low-viscosity cement during PVP procedures in the treatment of OVCFs not only quickly and significantly relieves pain, reduces the incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures, and prevents progressive kyphotic deformity, but also does not increase the risk of cement leakage when compared with that of the traditional injection procedure., (Copyright © 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and safety of transpedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) using thick bone cement in patients with intractable metastatic vertebral pain and at high risk for cement leakage., Methods: Unilateral transpedicular PVP using firm bone cement was performed in 77 patients with intractable pain due to vertebral metastases in the thoracolumbar spine, who had one or more relative contraindication to PVP. Primary outcome measures were the severity of pain as assessed on a 100-mm visual analogue scale and daily morphine consumption. Secondary outcome measures were the degree of disability and the incidence of procedure-related adverse outcomes. The outcome measures were assessed at the preoperative visit and at 1 day, 1 week, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the procedure., Results: Sixty-three (81.8%) patients completed the 12-week follow-up period. There were 30 men and 33 women, with a mean age of 58±11 (SD) [range: 34-81 years]. Compared with pre-procedure value, all post-procedure pain scores were significantly lower (P<0.0001). Likewise, there was a statistically significant reduction in daily morphine consumption at all follow-up times (P<0.0001). The ambulation score, ADL, and ODI were all significantly lower at all assessment times compared with pre-procedure values (P<0.0001). No serious adverse effects were observed., Conclusion: PVP using thick bone cement could be administered with reasonable safety to patients suffering from intractable pain caused by vertebral metastases who were at high risk for cement leakage. The procedure was associated with significant improvement of pain and disability., (Copyright © 2017 Editions françaises de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study mainly aimed to evaluate complications of cement leakage for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures by PVP using HVC, and access the clinical efficacy., Methods: Between May 2013 and June 2015, 66 patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures, who underwent PVP (36 HVC and 30 LVC) in our hospital, were enrolled. Cement leakage, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), refracture of the cemented vertebrae, and adjacent vertebral fractures were evaluated. The follow-up time was 1 year., Results: The overall cement leakage rate was 30.55% in the HVC group, lower than 77.77% obtained in the LVC group (P = 0.00). The incidence rates of cement leakage into paravertebral area (P = 0.02) and vein (P = 0.04) in the HVC group were significantly lower than those of the LVC group; however, no differences were found for disc space (P = 0.72) and intraspinal space (P = 0.58). There were no differences in VAS, ODI, refracture of cemented vertebrae, and adjacent vertebral fracture between the two groups (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: PVP using HVC not only can reduce cement leakage, especially in the paravertebral area and peripheral vein, but also has satisfactory clinical effect., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Cement leakage is the most common complication of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. So far, the reported risk factors remain conflicting because of limited data and lack of uniform measurement and evaluation. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of potential risk factors for cement leakage after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty., Methods: Relevant literature was retrieved using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, and MEDLINE with no language restriction, supplemented by a hand search of the reference lists of selected articles. A fixed-effects model was used if homogeneity existed among included studies; otherwise, a random-effects model was used. The results were presented with weighted mean difference for continuous outcomes and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: Twenty-two studies consisting of 2872 patients with 4187 vertebrae were included in the meta-analysis. The incidences of cement leakage for percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty were 54.7% and 18.4%, respectively. The significant risk factors for new vertebral compression fractures were intravertebral cleft (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78; P < 0.01), cortical disruption (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 1.84-16.81; P < 0.01), cement viscosity (OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.36-8.07; P < 0.01) and injected cement volume (weighted mean difference, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.02-1.17; P < 0.05). Age, sex and fracture type, operation level, and surgical approach were not significant risk factors., Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that patients with intravertebral cleft, cortical disruption, low cement viscosity, and high volume of injected cement may be at high risk for cement leakage after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Rigorous patient selection and individual therapeutic strategy irrespective of age, sex and fracture type, operation level, and surgical approach may reduce the occurrence of cement leakage. Given the inherent limitation of the meta-analysis, more large sample-sized randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate the present findings., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cement leakage is the most common complication during vertebroplasty and may result in serious morbidity. Measures to reduce the rate of cement leakage are valuable ways to improve vertebroplasty safety. The present study aimed to evaluate whether creating a small cavity in the vertebral body prior to cement injection would reduce the rate of cement leakage during vertebroplasty. The study included 36 consecutive patients with 42 painful osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures that were classified as A1 fractures according to AO classification. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either treatment with vertebroplasty (control) or with a procedure termed cavuplasty, in which a small cavity was created in the vertebral body prior to cement injection. CT scanning was performed to detect cement leakage. Cement leakage was observed in 14 (66.6%) of the 21 vertebral bodies treated with vertebroplasty and 5 (23.8%) of the 21 vertebral bodies treated with cavuplasty (p = 0.012). These results suggest that the creation of a small cavity in the vertebral body prior to cement injection is an effective way to reduce cement leakage during vertebroplasty. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:154-159, 2017., (© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: The purpose of the present study is to identify independent risk factors for the occurrence of cement leakage (CL) during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for four different leakage types in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients who underwent PVP for single-level OVCF from January 2009 to March 2011. The influences of several potential risk factors that might affect the occurrence of CL were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Cement leakage was evaluated by computed tomography and classified into four different types: through the basivertebral vein (B-type), the segmental vein (S-type), a cortical defect (C-type), and intradiscal leakage (D-type)., Results: Cement leakage was found in 227 of the 292 treated vertebrae. None of the parameters showed a statistically significant effect by univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis showed that cement viscosity was an independent risk factor in B-type CL, fracture severity and fracture type were in S-type CL, fracture severity and presence of cleft on MRI were in C-type CL, and fracture severity, cortical disruption on MRI, presence of cleft on MRI and cement viscosity were in D-type CL., Conclusion: Each different vertebral fracture pattern has its own risk factors for CL. Identification of the above predicting factors for CL preoperatively might be helpful for more rigorous and strict patient selection criteria for the appropriate candidates for PVP.

Purpose: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a common procedure in spine surgery. Bone cement leakage is the most common complication related to this procedure. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for cement leakage after PVP., Methods: A total of 485 patients who underwent PVP between August 2003 and August 2013 were enrolled in the study. Clinical and radiological characteristics, including age, gender, diagnosis, operated level, surgical approach, type of anesthesia, volume of bone cement, fracture type, and fracture severity, were considered as potential risk factors. Cement leakage was assessed based on post-operative imaging examination. Six types of leakage were defined and risk factors for each type were analyzed., Results: The incidence of leakage was 58.2 %. Binary logistic analysis revealed that larger volume of bone cement (P < 0.001) and higher fracture severity grade (P < 0.001) were the strongest independent risk factors. Univariate analysis and multinomial logistic analysis showed that surgical approach (P < 0.001), gender (P = 0.016), and operated level (P = 0.032) were additional risk factors for leakage. Further analysis showed that more bone cement was used in bilateral than unilateral approaches, that men had larger volumes of bone cement injected than women, and that more bone cement was injected into lumbar vertebrae than thoracic vertebrae. Therefore, these risk factors (surgical approach, gender, and operated level) could be attributed to excess bone cement usage., Conclusions: Cement leakage is very common with PVP. Higher fracture severity grade and larger volume of bone cement were the two strongest independent risk factors for leakage.

Background: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) are minimally invasive and effective vertebral augmentation techniques for managing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Recent meta-analyses have compared the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between patients treated with vertebral augmentation techniques or conservative treatment; however, the inclusions were not thorough and rigorous enough, and the effects of each technique on the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures remain unclear., Purpose: To perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies with more rigorous inclusion criteria on the effects of vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for OVCF on the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures., Material and Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SpringerLink, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database were searched for relevant original articles comparing the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for patients with OVCFs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) were identified. The methodological qualities of the studies were evaluated, relevant data were extracted and recorded, and an appropriate meta-analysis was conducted., Results: A total of 13 articles were included. The pooled results from included studies showed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between patients treated with vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment. Subgroup analysis comparing different study designs, durations of symptoms, follow-up times, races of patients, and techniques were conducted, and no significant differences in the incidence of secondary fractures were identified (P > 0.05). No obvious publication bias was detected by either Begg's test (P = 0.360 > 0.05) or Egger's test (P = 0.373 > 0.05)., Conclusion: Despite current thinking in the field that vertebral augmentation procedures may increase the incidence of secondary fractures, we found no differences in the incidence of secondary fractures between vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for patients with OVCFs., (© The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014.)

This retrospective study evaluated the relationship between intervertebral cement leakage and new adjacent vertebral fracture and describes the different characteristics of cement leakage. Increased risk of new adjacent vertebral fracture (NF) has been reported to be a complication of cement leakage in vertebroplasty. In our observation, an incidental intervertebral cement leakage may occur during vertebroplasty but is commonly asymptomatic. The study focused on osteoporotic collapse patients who had percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) between 2005 and 2007. We divided patients into leakage and non-leakage groups and compared the incidence of NF. Leakage characteristics were divided into three types: Type I intervertebral-extradiscal leakage, Type II intradiscal leakage and Type III combined leakage. Visual analog scale for pain and the Karnofsky Performance Status at 24 h, three months, six months and one year were compared between groups and types of leakages. Among 148 PVs (102 patients) there were 30 leakages (20.27%) and 21(14.19%) NFs. The incidence of NF did not significantly differ between leakage and non-leakage groups (P<0.05). Type II was the most common type of leakage (15/30). Reduction of average pain and improvement of Karnofsky Performance Status score did not differ between groups (P< 0.05). Type II had decreased pain score < type I and III at 24 h (P < 0.01), three months and six months (P < 0.1) but not at one year (P<0.10). Type II also had decreased pain score < non-leakage group only at 24 h (P<0.05). Intervertebral cement leakage is not an increased risk for NF, influenced outcomes of pain relief or improvement of physical function. Intradiscal leakage (Type II) is the most common characteristic of cement leakage and probably related to delayed pain relief.

Understanding the cement injection behaviour during vertebroplasty and accurately predicting the cement placement within the vertebral body is extremely challenging. As there is no standardized methodology, we propose a novel method using reproducible and pathologically representative flow models to study the influence of cement properties on injection behaviour. The models, confined between an upper glass window and a lower aluminium plate, were filled with bone marrow substitute and then injected (4, 6 and 8 min after cement mixing) with commercially available bone cements (SimplexP, Opacity+, OsteopalV and Parallax) at a constant flow rate (3 mL/min). A load cell was used to measure the force applied on the syringe plunger and calculate the peak pressure. A camera was used to monitor the cement flow during injection and calculate the following parameters when the cement had reached the boundary of the models: the time to reach the boundary, the filled area and the roundness. The peak pressure was comparable to that reported during clinical vertebroplasty and showed a similar increase with injection time. The study highlighted the influence of cement formulations and model structure on the injection behaviour and showed that cements with similar composition/particle size had similar flow behaviour, while the introduction of defects reduced the time to reach the boundary, the filled area and the roundness. The proposed method provides a novel tool for quick, robust differentiation between various cement formulations through the visualization and quantitative analysis of the cement spreading at various time intervals., (© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)

Although imaging plays a critical role and has become an integral part in preprocedure evaluation of osteoporotic patients at risk of compression fracture, many treated patients undergo follow-up imaging, for reasons ranging from potential procedure-related complications to development of new symptoms after initial improvement after successful vertebral augmentation (VA). Although imaging is frequently obtained for evaluation of these patients, there is a general lack of knowledge about imaging characteristics of treated vertebrae. This article reviews various indications for post-VA imaging, the appearance of augmented spine on imaging, and the important complications associated with the VA procedure., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Vertebral augmentation techniques have advanced significantly, offering improved outcomes in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. This review explores third-generation devices such as the SpineJack®, Vertebral Body Stenting System® (VBS), and OsseoFix®, which offer enhanced vertebral height restoration, stability, and reduced complications. These devices have been shown to outperform traditional methods like vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty, particularly in reducing the risk of cement leakage and ensuring long-term vertebral stability. Biomechanical studies confirm the efficacy of these systems in promoting spinal recovery. Many of these studies have utilized indirect parameters, such as the Beck Index and kyphotic angles (α and γ) measured by the Cobb method, to evaluate improvements in vertebral deformity. Furthermore, preclinical studies indicate that third-generation devices like SpineJack® enhance vertebral height restoration and stability, with performance influenced by bone quality and implant positioning, and have demonstrated superior initial and sustained height maintenance compared to kyphoplasty. While the higher costs of third-generation systems could be justified by reduced revision rates and better patient outcomes, further research is needed to optimize patient selection and assess long-term benefits. Overall, these devices could represent a significant advancement in vertebral fracture treatment, improving clinical outcomes and biomechanical stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Cervical spine fractures in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are characterized as highly unstable fractures posing an elevated risk of neurological deficit and a significantly elevated mortality rate. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of single-stage plate stabilization with ventral cement augmentation in treating subaxial cervical spine fractures in patients with AS. Methods: Over 86 months, 38 patients diagnosed with AS received ventral plate stabilization with cement augmentation after suffering unstable subaxial cervical fractures. No additional dorsal stabilization was used in any of these surgeries. Results: There were no complications as a result of cement leakage. During the follow-up period, screw loosening and implant displacement were documented in two out of 38 cases. At the time of data analysis, 17 patients who had undergone treatment had died, representing 44.7% of the total cases. Seven patients died within 1 month, two patients died within 6 months, four patients died within 1 year, and four patients died after 1 year. Conclusions: Our study shows that a single-stage anterior screw and plate fixation of the cervical spine with cement augmentation could be a feasible and effective method to treat cervical spine fractures in patients with AS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vertebral augmentation techniques have advanced significantly, offering improved outcomes in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. This review explores third-generation devices such as the SpineJack®, Vertebral Body Stenting System® (VBS), and OsseoFix®, which offer enhanced vertebral height restoration, stability, and reduced complications. These devices have been shown to outperform traditional methods like vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty, particularly in reducing the risk of cement leakage and ensuring long-term vertebral stability. Biomechanical studies confirm the efficacy of these systems in promoting spinal recovery. Many of these studies have utilized indirect parameters, such as the Beck Index and kyphotic angles (α and γ) measured by the Cobb method, to evaluate improvements in vertebral deformity. Furthermore, preclinical studies indicate that third-generation devices like SpineJack® enhance vertebral height restoration and stability, with performance influenced by bone quality and implant positioning, and have demonstrated superior initial and sustained height maintenance compared to kyphoplasty. While the higher costs of third-generation systems could be justified by reduced revision rates and better patient outcomes, further research is needed to optimize patient selection and assess long-term benefits. Overall, these devices could represent a significant advancement in vertebral fracture treatment, improving clinical outcomes and biomechanical stability.

Background: To analyze and evaluate the clinical outcomes of using high-viscosity bone cement compared to low-viscosity bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for treatment of Kummell's disease. Methods: From July 2017 to July 2019, 68 Kummell's disease patients who underwent PVP were chosen and separated into 2 groups: H group (n = 34), were treated with high-viscosity bone cement and L group (n = 34), treated with low-viscosity bone cement during treatment. The operation time, number of fluoroscopy tests done, and amount of bone cement perfusion were recorded for both groups. Clinical outcomes were compared, by measuring their Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Kyphosis Cobb's angle, vertebral height compression rate, and other complications. Results: High-viscosity group showed less operation time and reduced number of fluoroscopy tests than the low-viscosity group (P < 0.05). When compared to preoperative period, both groups' VAS and ODI scores were significantly reduced at 1 day and 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.05). The vertebral height compression rate and Cobb's angle were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in both groups after surgery compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05). The cement leakage rate in group H was 26.5%, which was significantly lower than that in group L, which was 61.8% (P < 0.05). Conclusions: High-viscosity and low-viscosity bone cement in PVP have similar clinical efficacy in reducing pain in patients during the treatment, but in contrast, high-viscosity bone cement shortens the operative time, reduces number of fluoroscopy views and vertebral cement leakage and improves surgical safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of cement in pedicle screw augmentation (PSA) enhances the pullout force of pedicle screws in vertebrae affected by osteoporosis. Risks involved in the use of cement for PSA include nerve injury and vascular damage caused by cement leakage. This study included all patients who received PSA for degenerative lumbar stenosis in osteoporotic vertebrae from January 2014 to May 2022. Postoperative computed tomography was used to assess cement leakage. Correlation analysis and logistic regression analyses were used to establish the associated clinical or radiological factors, which were then used to construct nomograms and web calculators. The study comprised 181 patients including 886 screws inserted into 443 vertebrae. Perivertebral cement leakage was significantly associated with female sex, decreased bone mineral density, solid screws, and scattered cement distribution. Cement leakage through segmental veins (type S, 72.1%), leakage through basivertebral veins (type B, 23.9%), and instrument-related leakage (type I, 13.9%) accounted for most cement leakage. Patients with lower bone mineral density and scattered cement distribution were more likely to experience type S or type B leakage. Our analysis data showed that cement augmentation with cannulated and fenestrated screws tended toward concentrated cement distribution. Creation and verification of each nomogram additionally showcased the prognostic capability and medical significance of the corresponding model. Nomograms and web-based calculators can accurately forecast the probability of cement leakage. PSA should be routinely performed using cannulated and fenestrated screws, along with a moderate amount of high-viscosity cement, with continuous monitoring using fluoroscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current meta-analysis was performed to gather available evidence regarding the incidence and risk factors of cement leakage (CL) in patients undergoing surgical procedures for spinal metastasis. Two authors independently searched the PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Clinical studies reporting the incidence or risk factors of CL were included for analysis. The primary outcome analyzed was the incidence of various types of CL. Random-effects or fixed-effects single-proportion meta-analyses were conducted to pool the available evidence, based on the heterogeneity test. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on surgical procedures (percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, and others). Risk factors of CL were synthesized narratively to identify the most commonly accepted factors. A total of 26 studies, involving 2551 patients, were included. The number of operated spine segments was reported in 23 studies, accounting for 4101 vertebrae. The pooled incidences of general, intradiscal, paravertebral, spinal canal, and intravascular CLs were 0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11–0.28), 0.14 (95% CI, 0.08–0.21), 0.13 (95% CI, 0.06–0.21), 0.11 (95% CI, 0.05–0.19), and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08–0.17), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed significantly different incidences of general CL (0.37 vs. 0.06 vs. 0.09, P < 0.01), intradiscal CL (0.22 vs. 0.06 vs. 0.12, P < 0.01), paravertebral CL (0.25 vs. 0.03 vs. 0.06, P < 0.01), and vascular CL (0.14 vs. 0.03 vs. 0.15, P < 0.01) among the three groups. Posterior wall disruption, pathologic fracture, and the number of treated vertebral levels were the most commonly identified independent risk factors for general CL. Posterior wall disruption was determined as a common significant risk factor for spinal canal CL. This review provides insights into the incidence and risk factors associated with CL in surgical procedures for spinal metastasis. Understanding these risk factors can contribute to the development of tailored strategies aimed at minimizing CL occurrence and optimizing surgical outcomes for patients undergoing spinal metastatic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Symptomatic osteoporotic compression fractures are commonly addressed through vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. However, cement leakage poses a significant risk of neurological damage. We introduced "aspiration percutaneous kyphoplasty", also known as "decompressed kyphoplasty", as a method to mitigate cement leakage and conducted a comparative analysis with high viscosity cement vertebroplasty. We conducted a retrospective study that included 136 patients with single-level osteoporotic compression fractures. Among them, 70 patients underwent high viscosity cement vertebroplasty, while 66 patients received decompressed percutaneous kyphoplasty with low-viscosity cement. Comparison parameters included cement leakage rates, kyphotic angle alterations, and the occurrence of adjacent segment fractures. The overall cement leakage rate favored the decompressed kyphoplasty group (9.1% vs. 18.6%), although statistical significance was not achieved (p = 0.111). Nonetheless, the risk of intradiscal leakage significantly reduced in the decompressed kyphoplasty cohort (p = 0.011), which was particularly evident in cases lacking the preoperative cleft sign on X-rays. Kyphotic angle changes and the risk of adjacent segment collapse exhibited similar outcomes (p = 0.739 and 0.522, respectively). We concluded that decompressed kyphoplasty demonstrates efficacy in reducing intradiscal cement leakage, particularly benefiting patients without the preoperative cleft sign on X-rays by preventing intradiscal leakage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Percutaneous sacroplasty is a minimally invasive procedure which utilises injection of bone cement into the sacrum for stabilisation of osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF) and neoplastic lesions to relieve pain and improve function. While effective, cement leakage is an important complication associated with the procedure. This study aims to compare the incidence and patterns of the cement leakages following sacroplasty for SIF versus neoplasia and discuss the various patterns of cement leakage and their implications. Materials and methods: This retrospective study analysed 57 patients who underwent percutaneous sacroplasty at a tertiary orthopaedic hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups of SIF (n=46) and neoplastic lesions (n=11) based on their indication for sacroplasty. Pre- and post-procedural CT fluoroscopy was used to assess for cement leakage. The incidence and patterns of cement leakage were both compared among the two groups. A Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Eleven (19%) patients had cement leakage on post-procedural imaging. The most common sites of cement leakage were into the presacral region (6), followed by sacroiliac joints (4), sacral foramina (3) and posterior sacral (1). There was a statistically significant higher incidence of leakage in the neoplastic group in comparison to SIF group (P-value <0.05). The incidence of cement leakage in the neoplastic group was 45% (n = 5/11) versus SIF 13% (n=6/46). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant higher incidence of cement leak in sacroplasties conducted for the treatment of neoplastic lesions compared to those with sacral insufficiency fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) was introduced to treat symptomatic vertical instability of the lumbar spine in a minimally invasive way. The aim of the present study was to analyze the complication pattern after PCD and to identify factors that predict the chance of cement leakage, reoperation, and length of hospital stay (LOS). patients were treated with PCD within the study period. Clinical features and complications were analyzed by applying descriptive statistics, whereas perioperative factors predictive of cement leakage, reoperation, and LOS were identified by regression models. Cement leakage rate was 30.4% in the total cohort; however, only fifth of them were symptomatic. Cement leakage itself did not have a significant influence on clinical outcome. Other complications and nonsurgical adverse events were registered only in 2.0% of cases. Age, subcutaneous fat tissue thickness, low viscosity cement, lower level of surgeon's experience and the number of operated levels were identified as risk factors of cement leakage (P < 0.01; c-index = 0.836). Type of procedure, Charlson comorbidity score, reoperation, and nonsurgical adverse events significantly increased the LOS (P < 0.01). Cement leakage, early surgical practice, and increased subcutaneous fat tissue thickness were risk factors for reoperation (P < 0.01; c-index = 0.72). PCD is a relatively safe and effective procedure for treating spinal instability caused by advanced-stage disc degeneration characterized by vacuum phenomenon. Cement leakage is not uncommon but is only a radiologic complication without clinical consequences in most cases. On the other hand, it can increase the LOS and is a significant risk factor for reoperation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vertebroplasty is a commonly done procedure in osteoporotic compression fracture. Cement leakage is the most common complication associated with vertebroplasty. Infection following vertebroplasty is rare. Fungal spondylodiscitis following vertebroplasty has not been reported in the literature. The objective of this clinical case report was to highlight this rare fungal spondylodiscitis following vertebroplasty. A 67-year-old woman was diagnosed with osteoporotic compression fracture for which vertebroplasty was done. During the procedure, the primary surgeon noticed the cement leakage without any neurological complication. The patient was referred to us. The patient was diagnosed with spondylodiscitis with cement leakage. We performed an open biopsy with cement removal with posterior thoracic decompression and interbody fusion. On microbiological examination, Aspergillus fumigatus were isolated from multiple samples that were susceptible to voriconazole. On 1-month follow-up, patient’s pain significantly reduced with normalized inflammatory markers. Presence of immunocompromised status with diabetes mellitus and lack of quality operating theater with inadequate maintenance of sterility protocols during the procedure could be the reason for the infection.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is the mainstream treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). In order to provide better clinical efficacy and reduce complications, various bone cement applicators are still being developed and gradually applied in clinical practice. However their clinical results are still to be reported.To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the novel spiral cement applicators and the traditional push-rod applicators for the PVP treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).A retrospective study, from February 2017 to May 2019, was conducted on 107 OVCF patients who received PVP surgeries respectively with spiral applicators (Observation group) and pushrod applicators (Control group). Perioperative indicators, imaging indicators, clinical efficacy, other indicators were collected and compared.The follow-up period was two years. The baseline data of the two groups were comparable (P > 0.05). The anterior edge height and kyphosis angle of the injured vertebrae after surgery compared with before surgery increased significantly in both groups (P < 0.05). The midline height in the observation group after surgery compared with before surgery increased significantly (P < 0.05). The kyphosis angle after surgery and these recovery rates of kyphosis angle, the anterior edge height, the midline height, the posterior edge height increased significantly in the observation group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). VAS and ODI in both groups were significantly lower on the 3rd day and 2nd year after surgery than before surgery, and decreased gradually over time (P < 0.05). The VAS and ODI on the 3rd day after surgery were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of fluoroscopy and operation time were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The rate of bone cement leakage, bone cement diffusion coefficient and cement volume in the observation group were significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05).The spiral applicator is better than the pushrod applicator in reducing the number of fluoroscopy and operation time, restoring vertebral height, correcting kyphosis, alleviating pain immediately, improving function, and facilitating dispersion of cement, with a higher rate of bone cement leakage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present a 79-year-old female patient who had L2–5 dynamic stabilization with cement (Polymethylmethacrylate) injection 6 weeks prior. Due to post-operative right radicular pain, a lumbar CT was scheduled in which a malposition of the right L4 screw and cement leakage was observed. Via a percutaneous translaminar endoscopic approach the leaked cement was removed and the portion of the screw in contact with the nerve root was drilled. With this minimal-invasive procedure, the patient was relieved of her radicular pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous sacroplasty is an effective treatment for painful sacral fractures and tumours, however there is no accepted optimal technique for performing this procedure. This study investigated a novel approach to sacroplasty combining co-axial sacral access, sequential cement injections and hypothermic cement manipulation to improve cement delivery.This retrospective study analysed 11 patients who underwent co-axial sacroplasty between April 2023 and March 2024 for treatment of painful insufficiency fractures (n = 5) or malignant sacral tumours (n = 6). All cases were performed using biplane fluoroscopy with conebeam CT navigation for planning and monitoring percutaneous access. Procedural details, technical outcomes, and clinical outcomes including Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain and analgesic utilisation on a six-point scale were analysed pre-procedure and at follow-up.Technical success of was achieved in all cases using this technique. The mean injected cement volume was 20.5 ± 6.4 ml. Median pre-procedural NRS pain scores of 8 (IQR 7.25–8) significantly decreased to 0 (IQR, 0–0.25) at follow-up (p <.01). The median preprocedural analgesic utilisation score reduced from 3 (IQR, 2–3) to 0 (IQR, 0–2.5) at follow-up (p <.01). Cement leakage occurred during two cases without associated adverse clinical sequelae. There were no major adverse events.Co-axial sequential injection sacroplasty is a safe and effective technique which allows facilitates controlled delivery of cement. Improved control of cement delivery, including around high-risk structures for cement leakage, offers a potential safety advantage over conventional sacroplasty techniques. Further research comparing technical and clinical outcomes to conventional techniques is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) is a widely used surgical technique in posterior spondylodesis of osteoporotic patients. Complications related to cement leakage after CAPSI was rarely reported compare to that of vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty and most of them are asymptomatic. Herein the authors report the case of a 67-year-old female who experienced cardiac perforation by string shape cement embolus after CAPSI. She underwent the foreign body removal operation through the 5th intercostal thoracotomy and she was well recovered consequently. Surgeons should be aware of this complication entity when encounter postoperative chest pain to avoid fatal results. The authors also reviewed the case reports for cardiac perforation by cement embolus and preventive modalities for the cement leakage.

Study Design: Retrospective study.Objective: To identify risk factors for cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) using low-viscosity bone cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).Summary Of Background Data: Cement leakage is the most common complication for PVP and its risk factors have been discussed. However, data in previous series were heterogeneous. Additionally, relative smaller patient sample or more types of cement leakage classified in those studies made the results conflicting.Methods: A total of 1090 patients who underwent PVP with low-viscosity bone cement for OVCFs in 1456 levels between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters potentially affecting the occurrence of cement leakage were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Cement leakage was assessed using postoperative computed tomography scanning, and classified into two types (cortical leakage and venous leakage) considering the mechanism.Results: The incidence of cortical and venous leakage were 20.3% (295/1456) and 56.2% (819/1456), respectively. Cortical disruption, basivertebral foramen were the strongest risk factors for cortical leakage (P = 0.000), venous leakage (P = 0.000), respectively. Greater cement volume is one risk factor for both cortical leakage and venous leakage. The intravertebral cleft, solid type of cement distribution were significant risk factors for cortical leakage, and they both were protective factors for venous leakage. For cortical leakage, older age and trauma were another two risk factors. For venous leakage, female was another one risk factor, and higher grade of fracture severity is the strongest protective factor.Conclusion: Both cortical leakage and venous leakage are prevalent. Adequate known of risk factors could help balance the incidence of two type leakage in unique vertebra and reduce the incidence of leakage in general in PVP for OVCFs.Level of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]